Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "newmds".
Did you mean:
newmd
2020 Apr 30
2
Discrepancy between Debug and Release+Asserts versions of Clang/LLVM
I agree that the ArrayRef is likely the issue. I've debugged a crash caused
by a temporary ArrayRef like that a couple times.
Either do what David suggested or use a normal array:
Metadata *mdArray[] = {ConstantInt::get(Int64Ty, 0), newMD};
~Craig
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 9:56 AM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at
2020 Apr 30
2
Discrepancy between Debug and Release+Asserts versions of Clang/LLVM
Hello,
I am editing the LowerTypeTests pass in LLVM, and part of my additions
include the following 3 lines of code:
// newTypeName is a std::string
MDString* newMD = MDString::get(M.getContext(), newTypeName);
ArrayRef<Metadata*> mdArray {ConstantInt::get(Int64Ty, 0), newMD};
auto* node = MDTuple::get(M.getContext(), mdArray);
Thus far, I have been developing on a version of Clang with
2009 Nov 05
0
[LLVMdev] Debug Information for LLVM 2.6 and TOT
Hi John,
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 8:43 AM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote:
> Does the debug facilities in LLVM TOT, at present, maintain information
> better than LLVM 2.6 (i.e., if a front-end puts the debug information in,
> will the optimizations not take it out)? Does the information that the
> llvm-gcc front-end adds comparable to what llvm-gcc in LLVM 2.6 does?
2009 Nov 05
2
[LLVMdev] Debug Information for LLVM 2.6 and TOT
Devang Patel wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:04 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> 1) I recall reading somewhere that a few optimizations in LLVM 2.6 strip
>> away debug information when such information interferes with
>> optimization. Is this correct,
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>
2012 Feb 02
3
SSD Drives
Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
quickly in high I/O situations? Something like each memory location
only has X many writes before its done. Just wandering if anyone has
tested it and if newer SSD's are better about
2013 Jul 15
3
SSD support in C5 and C6
Hey everyone,
My company is beginning to look at using SSD drives in our CentOS based
servers. Does C5 and C6 support TRIM and other "required" functions for the
SSD to operate?
Thanks,
Andrew Reis
Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist
CompTIA Network+
Networking/Systems Analyst
Webmaster
DBMS Inc.
2012 Oct 02
2
new "large" fileserver config questions
Hi all,
I was recently charged with configuring a new fairly large (24x3TB
disks) fileserver for my group. I think I know mostly what I want to do
with it, but I did have two questions, at least one of which is directly
related to CentOS.
1) The controller node has two 90GB SSDs that I plan to use as a
bootable RAID1 system disk. What is the preferred method for laying
out the RAID array? I