search for: newheaders

Hello, Here are a few misc. comments on this patch. Would it make sense to mark the ProfileInfo passes as "CFGOnly?" If so, that would let them be automatically preserved by passes which don't modify the CFG (and that call AU.setPreservesCFG()). > + if (ProfileInfo* PI = getAnalysisIfAvailable<ProfileInfo>()) { > + PI->splitEdge(OrigPreHeader, NewHeader,

Hi all, this (altough a big patch) is actually pretty straight forward: It (tries) to preserve ProfileInfo in all -std-compile-opts passes and all X86-Backend passes. There is still some passes that have corner cases where the ProfileInfo is not correct after the pass. Some passes are still missing... How shall I proceed with this? Andi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

...ors.kernel.org/centos/4.2/ While doing this I have come upon a few questions: a) it seems the server cd's have a lot of stuff not present in the normal directory mirror, I guess this is an artifact of the build process? [the template files for the servercd's are ~120MB] b) what are the .newheaders and .repodata directories on i386 CD1? c) why do the mirror repodata/*.xml.gz files not match neither the CD nor DVD versions for i386? d) why does the i386 DVD not match ideally, but the x86_64 DVD matches for _all_ files. The x86_64 CD1 also matches _much_ better than the i386 CD1... e) wh...

Hi! On 12/03/2009 07:50 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > Hello, > > Here are a few misc. comments on this patch. > > Would it make sense to mark the ProfileInfo passes as "CFGOnly?" > If so, that would let them be automatically preserved by passes > which don't modify the CFG (and that call AU.setPreservesCFG()). Yes, it would, how do I do this? :-) >> +