search for: newfs

Hi, I've been playing around with the APFloat class lately and I came across behavior I was not expecting based on reading the implementation comments and I'm wondering if it's a bug or intentional. The behavior concerns converting an APFloat to a string and back again. In the implementation of ``APFloat::toString(...)`` you can specify ``FormatPrecision`` as 0. The method comments

2011/2/28 John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>: > On 2/28/11 6:31 AM, Gabriel Rodríguez wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am trying to extend a FunctionType to include new parameters. In > particular, I want to > ensure that the main function has been declared with both argsc and argsv. > However > there seems to be no easy way to accomplish this: >

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:10 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 2/28/11 10:04 AM, Frits van Bommel wrote: >> I don't think a full clone is necessary, since he wants to replace the >> function. He only needs to create the new function and splice in the >> body of the old one. > > That is exactly what MakeFunctionClone() does.  It creates a

...Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 12 root 1 171 ki31 0K 16K RUN 0 8:59 97.90% idle: cpu0 11 root 1 171 ki31 0K 16K RUN 1 8:57 95.80% idle: cpu1 1102 root 1 -8 0 4752K 1256K physrd 1 0:01 19.64% newfs 4 root 1 -8 - 0K 16K - 0 0:00 0.10% g_down 1048 root 1 96 0 7656K 2544K CPU0 0 0:01 0.00% top 1054 root 1 96 0 7656K 2348K CPU1 1 0:01 0.00% top 863 root 1 96 0 131M 15768K select 0 0:00 0.00% httpd 1055 root...

On 2/28/11 10:04 AM, Frits van Bommel wrote: > 2011/2/28 John Criswell<criswell at illinois.edu>: >> On 2/28/11 6:31 AM, Gabriel Rodríguez wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to extend a FunctionType to include new parameters. In >> particular, I want to >> ensure that the main function has been declared with both argsc and argsv. >>

...otherwise had no problems in the eyes of fsck. booted again, instant panic. i booted an older 6.2 CD and mounted the filesystem fine. i then put that filesystem the way it was by mkdir'ing a distfiles dir and mv'ing everything into it, but on reboot it still paniced on mount. only a newfs was able to enable the filesystem to be mounted. today i did further research, thinking it had to do with the number of files in the top-level filesystem directory, and found that to be true. the short c program in the next section (how to repeat the problem) contains this. a second test show...

...otherwise had no problems in the eyes of fsck. booted again, instant panic. i booted an older 6.2 CD and mounted the filesystem fine. i then put that filesystem the way it was by mkdir'ing a distfiles dir and mv'ing everything into it, but on reboot it still paniced on mount. only a newfs was able to enable the filesystem to be mounted. today i did further research, thinking it had to do with the number of files in the top-level filesystem directory, and found that to be true. the short c program in the next section (how to repeat the problem) contains this. a second test show...

Dear All, I need your help urgently I have to copy the CFG of each function using CloneFunction or CloneFunctionInto. After I made the copy function. Print the basic blocks then get this error : While deleting: i32 % Use still stuck around after Def is destroyed: %mul2_ = mul nsw i32 %6, 3 Use still stuck around after Def is destroyed: store i32 3, i32* %x_, align 4 opt: Value.cpp:75: virtual

On 2/28/11 6:31 AM, Gabriel Rodríguez wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to extend a FunctionType to include new parameters. In > particular, I want to > ensure that the main function has been declared with both argsc and > argsv. However > there seems to be no easy way to accomplish this: > llvm::Function::getFunctionType() returns a > a reference to a const object,

...image itself fdisk -BI md0 # Write the DOS partition table # Create an inital BSD Label # For testing, we''ll assume one large partition bsdlabel -w -B md0s1 bsdlabel -e md0s1 # Change partition a from ''unused'' to ''4.2BSD'' newfs -O1 /dev/md0s1a # UFS, because pygrub doesn''t grok UFS2 # Mount up the image and do the installation mount /dev/md0s1a /media # Perform the installation to the disk image. cd /usr/src make -s DESTDIR=/media KERNCONF=XEN installworld make -s DESTDIR=/media KERNCONF=XEN installkernel make...

Hi all, I am trying to extend a FunctionType to include new parameters. In particular, I want to ensure that the main function has been declared with both argsc and argsv. However there seems to be no easy way to accomplish this: llvm::Function::getFunctionType() returns a a reference to a const object, while modifying only the argument list yields an error during verification since the

Hi, both versions are working: FunctionType *asm_Ftype = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); InlineAsm* Iasm = InlineAsm::get(asm_Ftype,"isync","~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}",true); How can I insert this InlineAsm, because it is no instruction and this way it will not work: Instruction *pi = bi;

Does cloning copies the function with its address or it constructs a new address to the new function? Is this real copying for the CFG or just opaque one to do some work? If it's not real copying, please I need a method that can help me in copying the function in another with new pointer to another address. Please I need answer urgent Thanks On 29 May 2013 10:14, Rasha Omar <rasha.sala7

...ths later I realise it would be so much nicer to be able to snapshot my movies and photos seperatly for backups, instead of doing the whole share. Not hard to work around - zfs create and a mv/tar command and it is done... some time later. If there was say a "zfs graft <directory> <newfs>" command, you could just break of the directory as a new filesystem and away you go - no copying, no risking cleaning up the wrong files etc. Corollary - zfs "merge" - take a filesystem and merge it into an existing filesystem. Just a thought - any comments welcome. This me...

The `lofiadm'' man page describes how to export a file as a block device and then use `mkfs -F pcfs'' to create a FAT filesystem on it. Can''t I do the same thing by first creating a zvol and then creating a FAT filesystem on it? Nothing I''ve tried seems to work. Isn''t the zvol just another block device? -- -Gary Mills- -Unix Group-

...510 FC that has 12 x 300 GB disks. The 3510 is configured as HW RAID 5 with 10 disks and 2 spares and it''s exported to the V240 as a single LUN. We create iso images of our product in the following way (high-level): # mkfile 3g /isoimages/myiso # lofiadm -a /isoimages/myiso /dev/lofi/1 # newfs /dev/rlofi/1 # mount /dev/lofi/1 /mnt # cd /mnt; zcat /product/myproduct.tar.Z | tar xf - and we finally use mkisofs to create the iso image. UFS performance ---------------------- We created a UFS file system on the above LUN and the above iso creation process takes about 5 mins. (I don''...

hi sirs, i try to install galeon2 for my machine but get an error messages that i really do not understand while making mozilla. that errors appear at the very beginning of a make command. i attache my uname, df both before and after make, and errors message with this mail. in wchich case that inodes are not sufficient ? and also how to get rid of this kind of error. thank you in advance for

...features and fixes via patches (NOTE: later patch revision may already be available): Solaris 10 Update 3 (11/06) Patches sparc Patches * 118833-36 SunOS 5.10: kernel patch * 124204-03 SunOS 5.10: zfs patch * 122660-07 SunOS 5.10: zones jumbo patch * 120986-07 SunOS 5.10: mkfs and newfs patch * 123839-01 SunOS 5.10: Fault Manager patch i386 Patches * 118855-36 SunOS 5.10_x86: kernel Patch * 122661-05 SunOS 5.10_x86: zones jumbo patch * 124205-04 SunOS 5.10_x86: zfs/zpool patch * 120987-07 SunOS 5.10_x86: mkfs, newfs, other ufs utils patch * 123840-01 SunO...

Hi all, I'm rather new to LLVM and intend to dive into partial evaluation with LLVM. I tried to run the example from http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08-23/llvm_partial.pdf, which worked after some adaptations, which were necessary, because LLVM evolved since the slides were made. However, I also tried to get the same example running as an optimization pass following the instructions in

On Jul 31, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Michael Graumann wrote: > Thank you Chris, > for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions > > asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, > asm_arguments, false); > > Alternatively > > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, >