Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "newdf1".
Did you mean:
newdf
2009 Sep 16
1
re-code missing value
Dear all,
I have partial data set with four colums. First column is "site" with three
factors (i.e., A, B, and C). From second to fourth columns (v1 ~ v3) are my
observations. In the observations of the data set, "." indicates missing
value. I replaced "." with NA. To replace "." with NA, I used two steps.
First, I replaced "." with NA, and
2010 Aug 24
0
mlm for within subject design
...in df2. Df1
>has more firm/year rows than df2, and them don't match with none in df2.
That is what you believe but it seems that R disagrees.
I imagine the dataframes are too big to post so
what I would try first is to create new
dataframes containing just the variables firm and
year (say newdf1 and newdf2), merge them and see
whether I got the expected number of rows. If I
did then I would add other variables back into
the dataframe until the problem re-appeared.
>Cec?lia
>
>Em Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:09:57 -0500
> Erik Iverson escreveu:
>>Cecilia -
>>Find what col...