Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "new_ui".
Did you mean:
new_oi
2008 Jul 14
0
Problem with vampire: bloodlines
...uot;Fragment shader(s) linked, vertex shader(s) linked. \n Validation failed - samplers of different types are bound to the same texture image unit. \n"
Reference Count for Material ___error (132) != 0
Reference Count for Material debug/debugmrmnormals (1) != 0
Reference Count for Material hud/new_ui/firstbarframe (1) != 0
Reference Count for Material hud/new_ui/firstbarlace (1) != 0
Reference Count for Material hud/new_ui/firstbarblackfill (1) != 0
Reference Count for Material hud/new_ui/firstbarcolorfillaqua (1) != 0
Reference Count for Material hud/new_ui/firstbarcolorfillgray (1) != 0
Refer...
2012 Jan 07
3
Mixed-commit problem solved
...t-conversion.tar.gz
for your inspection. Remaining issues:
# 1. Have yet to find a clean merge point for any branch.
# 2. set-eol-style operations get lost; see tags windows-set-eol, reset-eol.
# 3. Should the first Eaton_SDK commit after the deleteall have a link
# back to trunk?
# 4. Is the new_UIs-root tag still useful? It doesn't seem to point
# at an actual branch.
Also, some remaining zero-fileop commits on the root branch should
probably be tagified.
>From what you said before, point 2 may actually be a non-issue.
Should I cross it off the list?
--
>>esr>>...
2012 Jan 09
1
reposurgeon progress
...mat.
I'd do that if I undertood the gitk code well enough. But it's pretty hairy,
and my Tcl-fu is weak. How's yours?
> Also attached is a patch to fix the help for several commands (they did not
> print anything in the interactive mode).
Applied, thanks.
>> # 4. Is the new_UIs-root tag still useful? It doesn't seem to point
>> # at an actual branch.
>
>ESR: In terms of content, no - not useful.
OK, crossed off my list.
>I think we have another case of some deleteall commits masking some other
>problem. From the reposurgeon Git repository, the...