Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "new_polici".
Did you mean:
new_policy
2008 Oct 29
4
[PATCH] cpufreq.c: shut up compiler about cpufreq_dom
Some versions of GCC are too stupid to figure out that cpufreq_dom is
only used if !!domexist and always set in that case, and complain that
it may be used uninitialised.
(In general it is IMO better to avoid these kind of flag
variables; I would prefer structures like
for (...) { cpufreq_dom = dom; if (...) goto cpufreq_dom_found; }
cpufreq_dom = 0;
cpufreq_dom_found:
but on
2011 Oct 20
0
[PATCH 07/12] cpufreq: allocate CPU masks dynamically
struct cpufreq_policy, including a cpumask_t member, gets copied in
cpufreq_limit_change(), cpufreq_add_cpu(), set_cpufreq_gov(), and
set_cpufreq_para(). Make the member a cpumask_var_t, thus reducing the
amount of data needing copying (particularly with large NR_CPUS).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
--- 2011-09-20.orig/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c 2011-10-12