search for: new_lanman_p16

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "new_lanman_p16".

2019 May 31
3
Inconsistency with LANMAN1 and Samba 4.9
...m. >> >> Question: Is this intended? And if yes, why are there all these options still settable? > You may be running into this code in passdb: > > bool pdb_set_plaintext_passwd(struct samu *sampass, const char *plaintext) > { > ... > if (!E_deshash(plaintext, new_lanman_p16)) { > /* E_deshash returns false for 'long' passwords (> 14 > DOS chars). This allows us to match Win2k, which > does not store a LM hash for these passwords (which > would reduce the effective pass...
2019 May 31
1
Inconsistency with LANMAN1 and Samba 4.9
...; > > You may be running into this code in passdb: > > > > > > > > > > bool pdb_set_plaintext_passwd(struct samu *sampass, const char *plaintext) > > > > > { > > > > > ... > > > > > if (!E_deshash(plaintext, new_lanman_p16)) { > > > > > /* E_deshash returns false for 'long' passwords (> 14 > > > > > DOS chars). This allows us to match Win2k, which > > > > > does not store a LM hash for these passwords...
2019 May 31
2
Inconsistency with LANMAN1 and Samba 4.9
Dear samba team, I have a lot of hobby projects including old PCs. I wanted to hook up a Win3.11 machine to my current Arch-Linux Workstation running samba 4.9.4. I have used the following configuration: [global] workgroup = HOMEBASE netbios name = Orcane wins support = Yes client signing = No domain master = No lanman auth = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 name
2019 May 31
0
Inconsistency with LANMAN1 and Samba 4.9
...from Windows 3.11 without any problem. > > Question: Is this intended? And if yes, why are there all these options still settable? You may be running into this code in passdb: bool pdb_set_plaintext_passwd(struct samu *sampass, const char *plaintext) { ... if (!E_deshash(plaintext, new_lanman_p16)) { /* E_deshash returns false for 'long' passwords (> 14 DOS chars). This allows us to match Win2k, which does not store a LM hash for these passwords (which would reduce the effective password length to 14 */...
2019 May 31
0
Inconsistency with LANMAN1 and Samba 4.9
...Is this intended? And if yes, why are there all these options still settable? > > You may be running into this code in passdb: > > > > bool pdb_set_plaintext_passwd(struct samu *sampass, const char *plaintext) > > { > > ... > > if (!E_deshash(plaintext, new_lanman_p16)) { > > /* E_deshash returns false for 'long' passwords (> 14 > > DOS chars). This allows us to match Win2k, which > > does not store a LM hash for these passwords (which > > would reduc...
2019 May 31
2
Inconsistency with LANMAN1 and Samba 4.9
...why are there all these options still settable? > > > You may be running into this code in passdb: > > > > > > bool pdb_set_plaintext_passwd(struct samu *sampass, const char *plaintext) > > > { > > > ... > > > if (!E_deshash(plaintext, new_lanman_p16)) { > > > /* E_deshash returns false for 'long' passwords (> 14 > > > DOS chars). This allows us to match Win2k, which > > > does not store a LM hash for these passwords (which > > >...
2019 May 31
0
Inconsistency with LANMAN1 and Samba 4.9
...e all these options still settable? >>>> You may be running into this code in passdb: >>>> >>>> bool pdb_set_plaintext_passwd(struct samu *sampass, const char *plaintext) >>>> { >>>> ... >>>> if (!E_deshash(plaintext, new_lanman_p16)) { >>>> /* E_deshash returns false for 'long' passwords (> 14 >>>> DOS chars). This allows us to match Win2k, which >>>> does not store a LM hash for these passwords (which >>>>...