search for: new_group

...start_ret; - - WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&root->fs_info->alloc_mutex)); - if (!cache) - goto out; - - last = max(search_start, cache->key.objectid); - -again: - ret = cache_block_group(root, cache); - if (ret) - goto out; - - if (cache->ro || !block_group_bits(cache, data)) - goto new_group; - - info = btrfs_find_free_space(cache, last, num); - if (info) { - *start_ret = info->offset; - return 0; - } - -new_group: - last = cache->key.objectid + cache->key.offset; - - cache = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(root->fs_info, last); - if (!cache) - goto out; - - *cache_ret =...

...->block_groups, list) { struct btrfs_free_space *free_space; - /* - * the only way this happens if our hint points to a block - * group thats not of the proper type, while looping this - * should never happen - */ - if (empty_size) - extra_loop = 1; - if (!block_group) - goto new_group_no_lock; + atomic_inc(&block_group->count); + search_start = block_group->key.objectid; +have_block_group: if (unlikely(!block_group->cached)) { mutex_lock(&block_group->cache_mutex); ret = cache_block_group(root, block_group); @@ -2626,152 +2620,87 @@ static noin...

...rfs-unstable/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c =================================================================== --- root.orig/btrfs-unstable/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ root/btrfs-unstable/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -2238,7 +2238,10 @@ static int noinline find_free_extent(str total_needed += empty_size; new_group: - block_group = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(info, search_start); + block_group = btrfs_lookup_block_group(info, search_start); + if (!block_group) + block_group = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(info, + search_start); /* * Ok this looks a little tricky, buts its really simple....

...lar, the user??s home directory or mail spool should probably be renamed manually to reflect the new login name. mv cec_support cec-support mv cec_support_comment cec-support-comment groupmod -n cec-support cec_support groupmod -n cec-support-comment cec_support_comment -n, --new-name NEW_GROUP The name of the group will be changed from GROUP to NEW_GROUP name. -ANGELO FAZZINA ITS Service Manager: Spam and Virus Prevention Mass Mailing G Suite/Gmail angelo at uconn.edu University of Connecticut, ITS, SSG, Server Systems 860-486-9075 -------------- next part ------------...

[2017/09/28 03:46:51.256663, 1] ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_topology.c:2730(kcctpl_get_spanning_tree_edges) ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_topology.c:2730: failed to run Kruskal's algorithm: NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER [2017/09/28 03:46:51.256953, 1] ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_topology.c:3283(kcctpl_create_connections) ../source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_topology.c:3283: failed get spanning tree edges:

...> > 1. Identify affected groups with "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs", > which reports errors like "ERROR: orphaned backlink attribute > 'memberOf'". > 2. Create new group > 3. Execute "perl ad_clone_group.pl 'Foobar_Group' ''New_Group" to copy > members from broken group to new group: https://pastebin.com/6L8NZPRC > 4. Delete bad group > 5. Rename new group to name of bad group > 6. Expunge tombstone with "samba-tool domain tombstones expunge > --tombstone-lifetime=0" > 7. Check with "...

I'm running a bit late with the e-mail this time around, but I think that's ok since there really isn't any major new features here - the bulk of the Ocfs2 update is bug fixes, or cleanups. The same goes for configfs. The only two things that could be described as features would be: - Sunil has updated Ocfs2 to provide even more live cluster locking information via debugfs. - Joel

Hi All, I'm trying to add a user to a group using /usr/local/samba/bin/net rpc group addmem room11 dunk -Uroot%password The user is added to the group as far as I can tell but the command returns NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED This is on Solaris 10 (Sparc) and Samba 3.2.1, OS and Samba are both configured to lookup users and groups in LDAP. /usr/local/samba/bin/net rpc group members

Hi, I want to switch from our Windows NT server ( which works as our PDC ) to Linux - Samba. Could you advice a step-by-step guide about this process, or is that possible, at all? Can I use Samba as a BDC, convert the user DB and than promote it to PDC? Thanks in advance! Regards; Istvan

...trans, root, bytenr, num_bytes, parent, - root_objectid, ref_generation, - owner_objectid, pin, pin == 0); + root_objectid, owner, offset, 1); pending_ret = del_pending_extents(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root); return ret ? ret : pending_ret; } @@ -1835,32 +1936,17 @@ new_group: error: return ret; } -/* - * finds a free extent and does all the dirty work required for allocation - * returns the key for the extent through ins, and a tree buffer for - * the first block of the extent through buf. - * - * returns 0 if everything worked, non-zero otherwise. - */ -int btrfs_...