Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "new_expect".
Did you mean:
new_aspect
2006 Sep 29
1
yielding consecutive values
...=========================================
--- test/mocha/expectation_test.rb (revision 62)
+++ test/mocha/expectation_test.rb (working copy)
@@ -91,6 +91,11 @@
assert_equal parameters_for_yield, yielded_parameters
end
+ def test_should_yield_with_block_result
+ expectation = new_expectation.yields( lambda { ''lambda return
value'' } )
+ expectation.invoke() { |*parameters| assert_equal [''lambda
return value''], parameters }
+ end
+
def test_should_return_specified_value
expectation = new_expectation.returns(99)
assert_equa...
2006 Sep 29
2
multiyield
...============================
--- test/mocha/expectation_test.rb (revision 62)
+++ test/mocha/expectation_test.rb (working copy)
@@ -91,6 +91,13 @@
assert_equal parameters_for_yield, yielded_parameters
end
+ def test_should_yield_multiple_times_with_multiyield
+ expectation = new_expectation.multiyield(:foo, 1, ''bar'')
+ actual = []
+ expectation.invoke() { |parameter| actual << parameter }
+ assert_equal [:foo, 1, ''bar''], actual
+ end
+
def test_should_return_specified_value
expectation = new_expectation.returns(99)...
2007 Mar 12
10
using mocha with rspec
Hi folks.
I''ve just started using rspec and I have to say it''s very nice. The
thing is, I prefer mocha''s mocking dialect. So I thought a simple
require ''mocha'' would set me up.
Unfortunately, rspec does all its goodness using do/end blocks in
anonymous classes, so it wasn''t quite that obvious.
Anyway, here is the incantation I ended up