search for: new_bb

Using 'NEW_BB->setIsLandingPad(true);' seems to resolve everything. Greetings, Jeroen Dobbelaere [...]

Hi all, I think that I came somewhat closer to a solution for splitting a MachineBasicBlock for a PSEUDO_CALL_R instruction and having a label to the new MBB: For following piece of code: --- typedef int callme_t(int a, int b); callme_t* c01; int foo(int a, int b) { return c01(a,b); // MachineBasicBlock will be split at call instruction } --- I have initially following correspondence: BB1

...always build a ScevUnknown from an SSA name and use that in the apply. > At the moment, we calculate at the beginning of each > polly statement (a basic block) a value for each virtual induction > variable of the original loops. For your example we get something like > this. > > new_bb: > new_iv_1 = add i32 c1, 0 > new_iv_2 = add i32 c1, 7 > new_iv_3 = add i32 c1, c2 > > .... > > I want to highlight here that the values new_iv_1, new_iv_2, new_iv_3 > correspond to the number of loop iterations of the original loop. As we > curr...

...loop to a symbolic expression. What type would this symbolic expression have? Would it be a SCEVExpr? At the moment, we calculate at the beginning of each polly statement (a basic block) a value for each virtual induction variable of the original loops. For your example we get something like this. new_bb: new_iv_1 = add i32 c1, 0 new_iv_2 = add i32 c1, 7 new_iv_3 = add i32 c1, c2 .... I want to highlight here that the values new_iv_1, new_iv_2, new_iv_3 correspond to the number of loop iterations of the original loop. As we currently require canonical induction variables,...

Hi Tobi, I would like to remove the SCEVRewriter code and replace it with a call to SCEVAddRec::apply (see attached a patch that adds just this function). More precisely I want to add another function called apply_map that applies a map (loop -> expr) on a given scev. This is the apply function on a multi-variate polynomial. So here is an overview of how I would like the scev code generator

...l branch to MBB2 as the terminator. (quite similar to splitBasicBlock in BasicBlock.cpp) Meanwhile, I am trying to come up with a variant of SplitCriticalEdge to do this but if someone can provide the code to split a MBB, it will be of great help. Jeroen Dobbelaere-2 wrote: > > Using 'NEW_BB->setIsLandingPad(true);' seems to resolve everything. > > Greetings, > > Jeroen Dobbelaere > [...] > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists...