Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "new_base".
Did you mean:
gem_base
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
...const unsigned long vdso_rel_sysenter_start[], vdso_rel_sysenter_end[];
#endif
/*
@@ -66,6 +68,142 @@ void enable_sep_cpu(void)
#endif
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_XEN) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO)
+static void __init relocate_vdso(Elf32_Ehdr *ehdr, unsigned long old_base, unsigned long new_base,
+ const unsigned long *reloc_start, const unsigned long *reloc_end)
+{
+#if 1
+ const unsigned long *reloc;
+
+ for (reloc = reloc_start; reloc < reloc_end; ++reloc) {
+ unsigned long *ptr = (void *)((unsigned long)ehdr + *reloc);
+
+ *ptr += new_base - old_bas...
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
...const unsigned long vdso_rel_sysenter_start[], vdso_rel_sysenter_end[];
#endif
/*
@@ -66,6 +68,142 @@ void enable_sep_cpu(void)
#endif
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_XEN) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO)
+static void __init relocate_vdso(Elf32_Ehdr *ehdr, unsigned long old_base, unsigned long new_base,
+ const unsigned long *reloc_start, const unsigned long *reloc_end)
+{
+#if 1
+ const unsigned long *reloc;
+
+ for (reloc = reloc_start; reloc < reloc_end; ++reloc) {
+ unsigned long *ptr = (void *)((unsigned long)ehdr + *reloc);
+
+ *ptr += new_base - old_bas...
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
...const unsigned long vdso_rel_sysenter_start[], vdso_rel_sysenter_end[];
#endif
/*
@@ -66,6 +68,142 @@ void enable_sep_cpu(void)
#endif
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_XEN) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO)
+static void __init relocate_vdso(Elf32_Ehdr *ehdr, unsigned long old_base, unsigned long new_base,
+ const unsigned long *reloc_start, const unsigned long *reloc_end)
+{
+#if 1
+ const unsigned long *reloc;
+
+ for (reloc = reloc_start; reloc < reloc_end; ++reloc) {
+ unsigned long *ptr = (void *)((unsigned long)ehdr + *reloc);
+
+ *ptr += new_base - old_bas...
2007 Aug 30
2
comparing pointer to integer?
..._base == MAP_FAILED) {
Should be fixed, probably like this:
if ((int)cache->mmap_base == MAP_FAILED) {
There are a lot of occurences for these in the source. GCC only warns
because of this, but DEC C is known to consider this an error:
Error: file-cache.c, line 79: In this statement, "new_base" and
"(-1)" may not be compared for equality or inequality.
if (new_base == MAP_FAILED) {
And indeed, unsigned integers and -1 are rarely equal.
--
Gabucino
2006 Aug 17
2
dovecot on OSF/1 4.0
...e == MAP_FAILED)
------------^
cc: Warning: mmap-anon.c, line 68: In this statement, "(-1)" of type
"long", is being
converted to "pointer to void".
return MAP_FAILED;
-----------------------^
cc: Error: mmap-anon.c, line 85: In this statement, "new_base" and
"(-1)" may not be compared for equality or inequality.
if (new_base == MAP_FAILED)
------------^
cc: Warning: mmap-anon.c, line 86: In this statement, "(-1)" of type
"long", is being converted to "pointer to void".
retu...