search for: new_array_cookie_test

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "new_array_cookie_test".

2014 Oct 01
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Address sanitizer regression test failures for PPC64 targets
...references). I decided to upgrade the > compiler I was using to build clang which made the problem with this > testcase to go away (!). > > Nevertheless, I still got problems in other testcases that may be > potentially related with the problem I was getting before. E.g., in the > new_array_cookie_test I am getting an infinite loop in the destructor of > the array (delete [] operator). I noticed that the references passed to > __asan_poison_cxx_array_cookie and __asan_load_cxx_array_cookie were > pointing to values differing in the 4 most significant bytes, which made me > suspect tha...
2014 Sep 05
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Address sanitizer regression test failures for PPC64 targets
Note that I've set the SA_NODEFER flag for the SEGV handler in the ASan runtime only a couple of days ago. Not sure that could've affected this test though; without that flag the second SEGV would've simply crashed the program. But you can try removing the flag from compiler-rt/trunk/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix_libcdep.cc and see if that makes any difference. HTH, Alex On
2016 Jan 26
2
Problems with test on ppc
Bill, For some reason the llvm-symbolizer tests fail on ppc: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux/builds/182/steps/ninja%20check%201/logs/stdio because it can't be started: /home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-test/clang-ppc64le/stage1/./bin/llvm-symbolizer: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found (required by
2018 Jun 04
5
6.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Hi, The 6.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged. Testers may begin testing and reporting results. -Tom
2018 Apr 26
7
6.0.1-rc1 has been tagged
Hi, I've just tagged the 6.0.1-rc1 release. Testers may begin testing and uploading binaries. Also, any tester who has not tested 5.0.2-rc1 and would like to do so please try to do this before Friday, because I would like to tag 5.0.2-final then. As a reminder to users and developers, May 18 is the deadline for submitting merge requests for 6.0.1, so there is still time to get bug fixes
2018 Feb 09
0
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
...tizer-x86_64-freebsd-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/ioctl.cc AddressSanitizer-x86_64-freebsd-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/large_allocator_unpoisons_on_free.cc AddressSanitizer-x86_64-freebsd-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/mmap_limit_mb.cc AddressSanitizer-x86_64-freebsd-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/new_array_cookie_test.cc AddressSanitizer-x86_64-freebsd-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/new_array_cookie_uaf_test.cc AddressSanitizer-x86_64-freebsd-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/new_array_cookie_with_new_from_class.cc AddressSanitizer-x86_64-freebsd-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/readv.cc AddressSanitizer-x86_64-f...
2018 Feb 09
2
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in >> a better state now. >> >> 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. >> >>