search for: new_addr

...truct sockaddr_vm *src, struct sockaddr_vm *dst) { @@ -533,6 +559,50 @@ static int __vsock_bind_stream(struct vsock_sock *vsk, return 0; } +int vsock_bind_dgram_generic(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr) +{ + static u32 port = LAST_RESERVED_PORT + 1; + struct sockaddr_vm new_addr; + + vsock_addr_init(&new_addr, addr->svm_cid, addr->svm_port); + + if (addr->svm_port == VMADDR_PORT_ANY) { + bool found = false; + unsigned int i; + + for (i = 0; i < MAX_PORT_RETRIES; i++) { + if (port <= LAST_RESERVED_PORT) + port = LAST_RESERVED_PORT + 1; + + new_a...

Hi Keir: These two patches remove the need for netloop by performing the copying in netback and only if it is necessary. The rationale is that most packets will be processed without delay allowing them to be freed without copying at all. So instead of copying every packet destined to dom0 we''ll only copy those that linger longer than a specified amount of time (currently 0.5s). As it

...nmap_region(pci_dev, r); + r->addr = -1; + pci_update_mappings(pci_dev); +} + static void pci_update_mappings(PCIDevice *d) { PCIIORegion *r; @@ -439,24 +473,7 @@ static void pci_update_mappings(PCIDevice *d) } /* now do the real mapping */ if (new_addr != r->addr) { - if (r->addr != -1) { - if (r->type & PCI_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO) { - int class; - /* NOTE: specific hack for IDE in PC case: - only one byte must be mapped. */ -...

...nmap_region(pci_dev, r); + r->addr = -1; + pci_update_mappings(pci_dev); +} + static void pci_update_mappings(PCIDevice *d) { PCIIORegion *r; @@ -439,24 +473,7 @@ static void pci_update_mappings(PCIDevice *d) } /* now do the real mapping */ if (new_addr != r->addr) { - if (r->addr != -1) { - if (r->type & PCI_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO) { - int class; - /* NOTE: specific hack for IDE in PC case: - only one byte must be mapped. */ -...

Hi Xiph.org Team. We are using opusfile library <https://github.com/xiph/opusfile> for streaming *.opus* audio in our projects. But now we have a problem with building opusfile library for android with *ndk-build*. In particular, with arm64-v8a platform: Google removed <sys/timeb.h> from android. And now building opusfile with nkd-build crashes with error "fatal error:

Hi, now that we have multi-transport upstream, I started to take a look to support network namespace (netns) in vsock. As we partially discussed in the multi-transport proposal [1], it could be nice to support network namespace in vsock to reach the following goals: - isolate host applications from guest applications using the same ports with CID_ANY - assign the same CID of VMs running in

Hi, now that we have multi-transport upstream, I started to take a look to support network namespace (netns) in vsock. As we partially discussed in the multi-transport proposal [1], it could be nice to support network namespace in vsock to reach the following goals: - isolate host applications from guest applications using the same ports with CID_ANY - assign the same CID of VMs running in

...remap.c @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ static void move_ptes(struct vm_area_str new_ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, new_pmd); if (new_ptl != old_ptl) spin_lock_nested(new_ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); + arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(); for (; old_addr < old_end; old_pte++, old_addr += PAGE_SIZE, new_pte++, new_addr += PAGE_SIZE) { @@ -109,6 +110,7 @@ static void move_ptes(struct vm_area_str set_pte_at(mm, new_addr, new_pte, pte); } + arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(); if (new_ptl != old_ptl) spin_unlock(new_ptl); pte_unmap_nested(new_pte - 1);

...vr_mask)); @@ -486,12 +506,21 @@ __gnttab_unmap_common( } } - if ( (op->host_addr != 0) && (op->flags & GNTMAP_host_map) ) - { - if ( (rc = replace_grant_host_mapping(op->host_addr, - op->frame, op->new_addr, - op->flags)) < 0 ) - goto unmap_out; + if ( op->flags & GNTMAP_host_map ) + { + if ( (op->host_addr != 0) ) + { + if ( (rc = replace_grant_host_mapping(op->host_addr, +...

...gt;host_addr; common->dev_bus_addr = op->dev_bus_addr; common->handle = op->handle; @@ -1083,9 +1088,9 @@ __gnttab_unmap_and_replace( struct gnttab_unmap_and_replace *op, struct gnttab_unmap_common *common) { - common->host_addr = op->host_addr; - common->new_addr = op->new_addr; - common->handle = op->handle; + common->host_addr = op->host_addr; + common->new_addr = op->new_addr; + common->handle = op->handle; /* Intialise these in case common contains old state */ common->dev_bus_addr = 0; @@ -1253,6 +...

Anyone out there using ActiveLDAP have an idea how I can accomplish creating an object one level below a known base where we have a variable item in the middle? That first sentence doesn''t even make sense to me. Here''s what I want to do: I have a user class that I use for managing users. Each user gets a ou called addressbook (which in turn will contain sub-entries, but

...truct sockaddr_vm *src, struct sockaddr_vm *dst) { @@ -558,50 +532,6 @@ static int __vsock_bind_stream(struct vsock_sock *vsk, return 0; } -int vsock_bind_dgram_generic(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr) -{ - static u32 port = LAST_RESERVED_PORT + 1; - struct sockaddr_vm new_addr; - - vsock_addr_init(&new_addr, addr->svm_cid, addr->svm_port); - - if (addr->svm_port == VMADDR_PORT_ANY) { - bool found = false; - unsigned int i; - - for (i = 0; i < MAX_PORT_RETRIES; i++) { - if (port <= LAST_RESERVED_PORT) - port = LAST_RESERVED_PORT + 1; - - new_a...

...truct sockaddr_vm *src, struct sockaddr_vm *dst) { @@ -558,50 +532,6 @@ static int __vsock_bind_stream(struct vsock_sock *vsk, return 0; } -int vsock_bind_dgram_generic(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr) -{ - static u32 port = LAST_RESERVED_PORT + 1; - struct sockaddr_vm new_addr; - - vsock_addr_init(&new_addr, addr->svm_cid, addr->svm_port); - - if (addr->svm_port == VMADDR_PORT_ANY) { - bool found = false; - unsigned int i; - - for (i = 0; i < MAX_PORT_RETRIES; i++) { - if (port <= LAST_RESERVED_PORT) - port = LAST_RESERVED_PORT + 1; - - new_a...

The virtio-vsock device specification is not finalized yet. Michael Tsirkin voiced concerned about merging this code when the hardware interface (and possibly the userspace interface) could still change. Please revert for now. I am working to finalize the virtio-vsock device specification and at that point the interfaces will be stable. Stefan Hajnoczi (6): Revert "VSOCK: fix

The virtio-vsock device specification is not finalized yet. Michael Tsirkin voiced concerned about merging this code when the hardware interface (and possibly the userspace interface) could still change. Please revert for now. I am working to finalize the virtio-vsock device specification and at that point the interfaces will be stable. Stefan Hajnoczi (6): Revert "VSOCK: fix

This patch series adds a virtio transport for AF_VSOCK (net/vmw_vsock/). AF_VSOCK is designed for communication between virtual machines and hypervisors. It is currently only implemented for VMware's VMCI transport. This series implements the proposed virtio-vsock device specification from here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.virtio.devel/855 Most of the work was done by

This patch series adds a virtio transport for AF_VSOCK (net/vmw_vsock/). AF_VSOCK is designed for communication between virtual machines and hypervisors. It is currently only implemented for VMware's VMCI transport. This series implements the proposed virtio-vsock device specification from here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.virtio.devel/855 Most of the work was done by

Hello guys, This was V2 of the virtio-vsock back in last October. I do not have time to work on it since then. People are asking the latest status of virtio-vsock from time to time, so I'm sending out the code for people who are interested in. Feel free to grab the code and work on it if you want. In commit d021c344051af91 (VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets), VMware added VM Sockets support. VM

Hello guys, This was V2 of the virtio-vsock back in last October. I do not have time to work on it since then. People are asking the latest status of virtio-vsock from time to time, so I'm sending out the code for people who are interested in. Feel free to grab the code and work on it if you want. In commit d021c344051af91 (VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets), VMware added VM Sockets support. VM

v2: * Rebased onto Linux v4.4-rc2 * vhost: Refuse to assign reserved CIDs * vhost: Refuse guest CID if already in use * vhost: Only accept correctly addressed packets (no spoofing!) * vhost: Support flexible rx/tx descriptor layout * vhost: Add missing total_tx_buf decrement * virtio_transport: Fix total_tx_buf accounting * virtio_transport: Add virtio_transport global mutex to prevent