search for: neuters

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > 1. I can't tell Microsoft Security Essentials to ignore anything. Even if > I click Allow, it breaks the pull. > 2. The issue is not me. I don't download virus infested stuff and I don't > visit dangerous sites so I rarely have a need for antivirus solutions. > > The issue is the

Hi, I'm trying to set up multiple standalone Samba servers that use the same OpenLDAP back-end database for authentication, but on any servers beyond the first one I cannot seem to get past the error like the following: "The primary group domain sid($SecondaryServerSID) does not match the domain sid($PrimaryServerSID) for $UserName($UserSID)" It seems nuts to have to set up a

From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com> The authentication can be circumvented, by design, by using the render node. >From the driver POV there is no distinction between primary and render nodes, thus we can drop the token. Note: the outstanding DRM_AUTH instance is: - legacy DRI1 ioctl, which is already neutered Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at

Hi, We have two domain controllers running Ubuntu 12.04 and Samba 4.0.6-Debian. The other day, we had a user set up a Windows Server 2012 computer on our development network for testing. This user chose to set up his Windows server as DC, DHCP server, DNS server, and more, for a new domain that he gave the same name as our production domain (let's say both domains are named

...y the exception clause. > > This is correct. > I’m surprised that all of the companies are happy with it, given that > neutering defensive patents was one of the big objections we saw to GPLv3. > In particular, various corporate lawyers were worried about this scenario > that neuters defensive patents): > Lawyers see risk everywhere, so i'll just go with "various corporate lawyers are concerned about everything, ever". Clearly, for the majority, the prediction that those concerns would not outweigh the desire to use the software came true. > >> I wa...

Hello all, I've taken a brief skim of the archives available on theaimsgroup and talked to some others regarding the ideas on chroot SSH/SFTP/SCP functionality. I've also investigated a few of the various patches out for chroot sftp|scp|ssh and am a bit of a loss at finding 'an elegant solution' to the problem. Bearing in mind the excellent starting ground of John Furman's

Hello all, After a hectic month in private life, as a byproduct I've got a viable merger of last released NUT 2.6.5 based Windows-ready codebase (thanks to the giants active a dozen years ago, on whose shoulders I stood today) and modern 2.8.x/master, fixing the merge conflicts and build warnings. Some details were tracked in discussion of https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/5

Hello all, After a hectic month in private life, as a byproduct I've got a viable merger of last released NUT 2.6.5 based Windows-ready codebase (thanks to the giants active a dozen years ago, on whose shoulders I stood today) and modern 2.8.x/master, fixing the merge conflicts and build warnings. Some details were tracked in discussion of https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/5

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> > To: "Mikael Lyngvig" <mikael at lyngvig.org> > Cc: "LLVMdev Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 5:00:03 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to: >> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.

+Rom who seems to be presenting about mainlining android sync at linux plumbers On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 05:58:52PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > You could neuter implicit fences by always attaching the fences as > shared when explicit syncing is used. This would work correctly with > eviction, and wouldn't cause any unneeded syncing. :) Yes, that will probably work! So, just

On Nov 12, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Talin wrote: > > Well, as far as intp goes (or iptr if you prefer - the naming > convention in LLVM is i<size>) How about "intptr". > here's what I would expect: > General rule #1: If an instruction accepts both i32 and i64, then it > should accept iptr as well. If it only accepts i32, then it can > continue to only

1. I can't tell Microsoft Security Essentials to ignore anything. Even if I click Allow, it breaks the pull. 2. The issue is not me. I don't download virus infested stuff and I don't visit dangerous sites so I rarely have a need for antivirus solutions. The issue is the newcomer Windows user whom I have to instruct to disable and/or remove his antivirus program if he or she wants to

Back from vacations, and before I dive into real-life work, I went over some ideas and notes from the NUT for Windows effort. Now they should be tracked at https://github.com/orgs/networkupstools/projects/2/views/1 and community help is welcome :) I probably forgot or missed some caveats - so feel free to post issues for this project if you think of some more... Jim On Thu, Jun 23, 2022, 23:52

Back from vacations, and before I dive into real-life work, I went over some ideas and notes from the NUT for Windows effort. Now they should be tracked at https://github.com/orgs/networkupstools/projects/2/views/1 and community help is welcome :) I probably forgot or missed some caveats - so feel free to post issues for this project if you think of some more... Jim On Thu, Jun 23, 2022, 23:52

On 2020-10-09 14:16, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Friday, October 09, 2020 6:29 PM +1300 Rob Kampen > <rkampen at kampensonline.com> wrote: > >> If this reject is due to their spam filtering process, it is actually the >> email author's problem - how they make up their sentences, key words etc. >> and thus the problem will travel with them, to whatever email

On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 09:19, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com> > > The authentication can be circumvented, by design, by using the render > node. > > From the driver POV there is no distinction between primary and render > nodes, thus we can drop the token. > > Note: the outstanding

> Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017 15:31:32 -0600 > From: Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> > > Dear Experts, > > Something went astray with one of my systems. Large number of > updates were installed on it all at once at some point. Then after > system was rebooted it does strange thing I haven't seen on other > systems. The machine is set up to

I have Samba 3.0.7 installed and running in security = ADS mode and I've built and installed the Idmap_ad backend according to the instructions. Group lookups seem to work fine, but getent passwd and id functions fail with the message - ad_idmap_get_id_from_sid: ads_pull_uint32 : could not read attribute 'gidNumber'. If I manually run an ldap query against Active Directory the

The CentOS drive for the HP NC4010 is built. I just needed to use external instead of USB power for my USB CDrom. Go figure... I did this in my hotel room, where they only have wireless. I went down to the 'business center' and used an ethernet drop, but I don't think the registration worked. I didn't know that even for the ehternet drops you have to do that portal thing