search for: neutering

...LVM by default either because they take too long to run, have too many host dependencies, have weird license restrictions, etc etc. It's not clear to me that making this optional test suite easier to install on restrictive platforms like Windows with this security software you mention is worth neutering the ClamAV tests run... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120615/48409278/attachment.html>

Hi, I'm trying to set up multiple standalone Samba servers that use the same OpenLDAP back-end database for authentication, but on any servers beyond the first one I cannot seem to get past the error like the following: "The primary group domain sid($SecondaryServerSID) does not match the domain sid($PrimaryServerSID) for $UserName($UserSID)" It seems nuts to have to set up a

From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com> The authentication can be circumvented, by design, by using the render node. >From the driver POV there is no distinction between primary and render nodes, thus we can drop the token. Note: the outstanding DRM_AUTH instance is: - legacy DRI1 ioctl, which is already neutered Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at

Hi, We have two domain controllers running Ubuntu 12.04 and Samba 4.0.6-Debian. The other day, we had a user set up a Windows Server 2012 computer on our development network for testing. This user chose to set up his Windows server as DC, DHCP server, DNS server, and more, for a new domain that he gave the same name as our production domain (let's say both domains are named

...t; The only complexity I’ve heard is that it introduces is a potential > compatibility issue with GPL2 (GPL3 and other licenses are fine), which is > addressed by the exception clause. > > This is correct. > I’m surprised that all of the companies are happy with it, given that > neutering defensive patents was one of the big objections we saw to GPLv3. > In particular, various corporate lawyers were worried about this scenario > that neuters defensive patents): > Lawyers see risk everywhere, so i'll just go with "various corporate lawyers are concerned about ev...

Hello all, I've taken a brief skim of the archives available on theaimsgroup and talked to some others regarding the ideas on chroot SSH/SFTP/SCP functionality. I've also investigated a few of the various patches out for chroot sftp|scp|ssh and am a bit of a loss at finding 'an elegant solution' to the problem. Bearing in mind the excellent starting ground of John Furman's

Hello all, After a hectic month in private life, as a byproduct I've got a viable merger of last released NUT 2.6.5 based Windows-ready codebase (thanks to the giants active a dozen years ago, on whose shoulders I stood today) and modern 2.8.x/master, fixing the merge conflicts and build warnings. Some details were tracked in discussion of https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/5

Hello all, After a hectic month in private life, as a byproduct I've got a viable merger of last released NUT 2.6.5 based Windows-ready codebase (thanks to the giants active a dozen years ago, on whose shoulders I stood today) and modern 2.8.x/master, fixing the merge conflicts and build warnings. Some details were tracked in discussion of https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/5

...ake too long to run, > have too many host dependencies, have weird license restrictions, etc > etc. > > > It's not clear to me that making this optional test suite easier to > install on restrictive platforms like Windows with this security > software you mention is worth neutering the ClamAV tests run... Might we also have problems with virus-scanning firewalls? Would it work if we XORed the ClamAV test's inputs with something, and then modified the test to XOR the results of its reads (to undo the transformation). If that is sufficient to get around this issue, then it...

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to: >> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.

...Maybe we can move > > forward with these parts, and continue to attach fences at submit until we have > > a satisfactory solution for the pinning problem? > > Yeah, that's our plan for i915 too. First add explicit fences, then figure > out whether we need to be better at neutering the implicit fences, in case > and only where it really gets in the way. > > > I'd like to understand what are the concrete steps to de-stage struct > > sync_fence, since that's the first thing that needs to be done. For example, > > what do you mean by "de-cl...

...xplains in prose the problem it is trying to solve, the tradeoffs, and a proposed implementation approach (like you have above). Whether or not you get time to start implementing it, it is a good idea to document the design tradeoffs considered and the effects of various decisions (such as neutering constant folding when TD isn't around). This is also a good way to get others to help out, -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091112/19ebcd6d/attachment.html>

1. I can't tell Microsoft Security Essentials to ignore anything. Even if I click Allow, it breaks the pull. 2. The issue is not me. I don't download virus infested stuff and I don't visit dangerous sites so I rarely have a need for antivirus solutions. The issue is the newcomer Windows user whom I have to instruct to disable and/or remove his antivirus program if he or she wants to

Back from vacations, and before I dive into real-life work, I went over some ideas and notes from the NUT for Windows effort. Now they should be tracked at https://github.com/orgs/networkupstools/projects/2/views/1 and community help is welcome :) I probably forgot or missed some caveats - so feel free to post issues for this project if you think of some more... Jim On Thu, Jun 23, 2022, 23:52

Back from vacations, and before I dive into real-life work, I went over some ideas and notes from the NUT for Windows effort. Now they should be tracked at https://github.com/orgs/networkupstools/projects/2/views/1 and community help is welcome :) I probably forgot or missed some caveats - so feel free to post issues for this project if you think of some more... Jim On Thu, Jun 23, 2022, 23:52

On 2020-10-09 14:16, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Friday, October 09, 2020 6:29 PM +1300 Rob Kampen > <rkampen at kampensonline.com> wrote: > >> If this reject is due to their spam filtering process, it is actually the >> email author's problem - how they make up their sentences, key words etc. >> and thus the problem will travel with them, to whatever email

On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 09:19, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com> > > The authentication can be circumvented, by design, by using the render > node. > > From the driver POV there is no distinction between primary and render > nodes, thus we can drop the token. > > Note: the outstanding

> Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017 15:31:32 -0600 > From: Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> > > Dear Experts, > > Something went astray with one of my systems. Large number of > updates were installed on it all at once at some point. Then after > system was rebooted it does strange thing I haven't seen on other > systems. The machine is set up to

I have Samba 3.0.7 installed and running in security = ADS mode and I've built and installed the Idmap_ad backend according to the instructions. Group lookups seem to work fine, but getent passwd and id functions fail with the message - ad_idmap_get_id_from_sid: ads_pull_uint32 : could not read attribute 'gidNumber'. If I manually run an ldap query against Active Directory the

The CentOS drive for the HP NC4010 is built. I just needed to use external instead of USB power for my USB CDrom. Go figure... I did this in my hotel room, where they only have wireless. I went down to the 'business center' and used an ethernet drop, but I don't think the registration worked. I didn't know that even for the ehternet drops you have to do that portal thing