search for: neutered

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > 1. I can't tell Microsoft Security Essentials to ignore anything. Even if > I click Allow, it breaks the pull. > 2. The issue is not me. I don't download virus infested stuff and I don't > visit dangerous sites so I rarely have a need for antivirus solutions. > > The issue is the

Hi, I'm trying to set up multiple standalone Samba servers that use the same OpenLDAP back-end database for authentication, but on any servers beyond the first one I cannot seem to get past the error like the following: "The primary group domain sid($SecondaryServerSID) does not match the domain sid($PrimaryServerSID) for $UserName($UserSID)" It seems nuts to have to set up a

...likov at collabora.com> The authentication can be circumvented, by design, by using the render node. >From the driver POV there is no distinction between primary and render nodes, thus we can drop the token. Note: the outstanding DRM_AUTH instance is: - legacy DRI1 ioctl, which is already neutered Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 26 ++++++++++++...

Hi, We have two domain controllers running Ubuntu 12.04 and Samba 4.0.6-Debian. The other day, we had a user set up a Windows Server 2012 computer on our development network for testing. This user chose to set up his Windows server as DC, DHCP server, DNS server, and more, for a new domain that he gave the same name as our production domain (let's say both domains are named

> > > > I’m still not completely convinced by this argument, given that the > majority of patent lawsuits come from NPEs. That is not necessarily where the majority of patent lawsuit *danger* comes from, and i'd argue, pretty strongly, it's not the most likely case for LLVM. > We’d still be in the situation where a malicious contributor could: > > 1. Spin up a

...oot by sshd. On massive user bases I see this as an minor diskspace issue [~50K extra per jailed user], not to mention scripting all the appropriate updates.]; furthermore, In my specific case at least, in the event of allowing a user into a valid [but jailed, stripped down ] shell, scp needs to be neutered to prevent it from copying remote to remote or local to remote. This requires creating a custom version of scp, nothing to terrible. But a more complex setup nonetheless. 3. Finally, there is locking down around ssh, i.e. chroot /chroot/sshdserver and have all users hit that copy. I don't like...

...r versed in the platform can pick it up from here, to discover and fix the missing and flawed bits, make sense of the installer, etc. and eventually make this codebase part of common NUT, multi-platform as it is. Sone points of interest OTOH: * c++ and a few drivers are currently effectively "neutered" * fcntl() code to avoid FD leaks to forked children, is it doable on Windows? * loading dlls from one dir, without copies near every exe (see common.c) * automatically tracking major version number X (from client/Makefile.am) for LTDL discovery of libupsclient-X.dll without hardcoding it * lo...

...r versed in the platform can pick it up from here, to discover and fix the missing and flawed bits, make sense of the installer, etc. and eventually make this codebase part of common NUT, multi-platform as it is. Sone points of interest OTOH: * c++ and a few drivers are currently effectively "neutered" * fcntl() code to avoid FD leaks to forked children, is it doable on Windows? * loading dlls from one dir, without copies near every exe (see common.c) * automatically tracking major version number X (from client/Makefile.am) for LTDL discovery of libupsclient-X.dll without hardcoding it * lo...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> > To: "Mikael Lyngvig" <mikael at lyngvig.org> > Cc: "LLVMdev Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 5:00:03 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to: >> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.

+Rom who seems to be presenting about mainlining android sync at linux plumbers On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 05:58:52PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > You could neuter implicit fences by always attaching the fences as > shared when explicit syncing is used. This would work correctly with > eviction, and wouldn't cause any unneeded syncing. :) Yes, that will probably work! So, just

On Nov 12, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Talin wrote: > > Well, as far as intp goes (or iptr if you prefer - the naming > convention in LLVM is i<size>) How about "intptr". > here's what I would expect: > General rule #1: If an instruction accepts both i32 and i64, then it > should accept iptr as well. If it only accepts i32, then it can > continue to only

1. I can't tell Microsoft Security Essentials to ignore anything. Even if I click Allow, it breaks the pull. 2. The issue is not me. I don't download virus infested stuff and I don't visit dangerous sites so I rarely have a need for antivirus solutions. The issue is the newcomer Windows user whom I have to instruct to disable and/or remove his antivirus program if he or she wants to

...can pick it up from here, to discover and fix the missing > and flawed bits, make sense of the installer, etc. and eventually make this > codebase part of common NUT, multi-platform as it is. > > Sone points of interest OTOH: > * c++ and a few drivers are currently effectively "neutered" > * fcntl() code to avoid FD leaks to forked children, is it doable on > Windows? > * loading dlls from one dir, without copies near every exe (see common.c) > * automatically tracking major version number X (from client/Makefile.am) > for LTDL discovery of libupsclient-X.dll w...

...can pick it up from here, to discover and fix the missing > and flawed bits, make sense of the installer, etc. and eventually make this > codebase part of common NUT, multi-platform as it is. > > Sone points of interest OTOH: > * c++ and a few drivers are currently effectively "neutered" > * fcntl() code to avoid FD leaks to forked children, is it doable on > Windows? > * loading dlls from one dir, without copies near every exe (see common.c) > * automatically tracking major version number X (from client/Makefile.am) > for LTDL discovery of libupsclient-X.dll w...

On 2020-10-09 14:16, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Friday, October 09, 2020 6:29 PM +1300 Rob Kampen > <rkampen at kampensonline.com> wrote: > >> If this reject is due to their spam filtering process, it is actually the >> email author's problem - how they make up their sentences, key words etc. >> and thus the problem will travel with them, to whatever email

...he authentication can be circumvented, by design, by using the render > node. > > From the driver POV there is no distinction between primary and render > nodes, thus we can drop the token. > > Note: the outstanding DRM_AUTH instance is: > - legacy DRI1 ioctl, which is already neutered > > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> > Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/...

...at was added to wheel as a part of the process. I then logged out of that and was able to get into my regular account (via the gui) just fine. I removed that spurious account and cleaned things up, but ended up in "first boot" again the next time the machine was rebooted. So, I've now neutered that account, but left it in place and haven't run into "first boot" again. I haven't been able to figure out what caused this, yet.

...nfo - I'm in Active Directory 2003 in Native Mode. Samba is built with local installations of kerberos and openssl to get around deficiencies in the system versions. The platforms are Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3.0, Fedora Core 2 x86_64 and Sun SPARC Solaris 8. I'll gladly supply neutered copies of configuration files, log files and ldap searches, but I think the ability to crank up the logging level of the ldap retrieval functions would be more valuable. Thanks, Scott

The CentOS drive for the HP NC4010 is built. I just needed to use external instead of USB power for my USB CDrom. Go figure... I did this in my hotel room, where they only have wireless. I went down to the 'business center' and used an ethernet drop, but I don't think the registration worked. I didn't know that even for the ehternet drops you have to do that portal thing