search for: neuter

...LVM by default either because they take too long to run, have too many host dependencies, have weird license restrictions, etc etc. It's not clear to me that making this optional test suite easier to install on restrictive platforms like Windows with this security software you mention is worth neutering the ClamAV tests run... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120615/48409278/attachment.html>

...controller just to have multiple standalone servers within the same workgroup. If I configure the secondary server to use a local user password database for authentication, everything works fine, but that means having to maintain the database in multiple locations. Is there a way to completely neuter all the domain functionality and use LDAP _only_ for username/password authentication from multiple standalone servers within the same workgroup? Gordan

...likov at collabora.com> The authentication can be circumvented, by design, by using the render node. >From the driver POV there is no distinction between primary and render nodes, thus we can drop the token. Note: the outstanding DRM_AUTH instance is: - legacy DRI1 ioctl, which is already neutered Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 26 ++++++++++...

Hi, We have two domain controllers running Ubuntu 12.04 and Samba 4.0.6-Debian. The other day, we had a user set up a Windows Server 2012 computer on our development network for testing. This user chose to set up his Windows server as DC, DHCP server, DNS server, and more, for a new domain that he gave the same name as our production domain (let's say both domains are named

...t; The only complexity I’ve heard is that it introduces is a potential > compatibility issue with GPL2 (GPL3 and other licenses are fine), which is > addressed by the exception clause. > > This is correct. > I’m surprised that all of the companies are happy with it, given that > neutering defensive patents was one of the big objections we saw to GPLv3. > In particular, various corporate lawyers were worried about this scenario > that neuters defensive patents): > Lawyers see risk everywhere, so i'll just go with "various corporate lawyers are concerned about...

...oot by sshd. On massive user bases I see this as an minor diskspace issue [~50K extra per jailed user], not to mention scripting all the appropriate updates.]; furthermore, In my specific case at least, in the event of allowing a user into a valid [but jailed, stripped down ] shell, scp needs to be neutered to prevent it from copying remote to remote or local to remote. This requires creating a custom version of scp, nothing to terrible. But a more complex setup nonetheless. 3. Finally, there is locking down around ssh, i.e. chroot /chroot/sshdserver and have all users hit that copy. I don't li...

...r versed in the platform can pick it up from here, to discover and fix the missing and flawed bits, make sense of the installer, etc. and eventually make this codebase part of common NUT, multi-platform as it is. Sone points of interest OTOH: * c++ and a few drivers are currently effectively "neutered" * fcntl() code to avoid FD leaks to forked children, is it doable on Windows? * loading dlls from one dir, without copies near every exe (see common.c) * automatically tracking major version number X (from client/Makefile.am) for LTDL discovery of libupsclient-X.dll without hardcoding it *...

...r versed in the platform can pick it up from here, to discover and fix the missing and flawed bits, make sense of the installer, etc. and eventually make this codebase part of common NUT, multi-platform as it is. Sone points of interest OTOH: * c++ and a few drivers are currently effectively "neutered" * fcntl() code to avoid FD leaks to forked children, is it doable on Windows? * loading dlls from one dir, without copies near every exe (see common.c) * automatically tracking major version number X (from client/Makefile.am) for LTDL discovery of libupsclient-X.dll without hardcoding it *...

...ake too long to run, > have too many host dependencies, have weird license restrictions, etc > etc. > > > It's not clear to me that making this optional test suite easier to > install on restrictive platforms like Windows with this security > software you mention is worth neutering the ClamAV tests run... Might we also have problems with virus-scanning firewalls? Would it work if we XORed the ClamAV test's inputs with something, and then modified the test to XOR the results of its reads (to undo the transformation). If that is sufficient to get around this issue, then...

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to: >> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.

+Rom who seems to be presenting about mainlining android sync at linux plumbers On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 05:58:52PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > You could neuter implicit fences by always attaching the fences as > shared when explicit syncing is used. This would work correctly with > eviction, and wouldn't cause any unneeded syncing. :) Yes, that will probably work! So, just to reiterate that I understood you and Daniel correctly: - de-stage sy...

...xplains in prose the problem it is trying to solve, the tradeoffs, and a proposed implementation approach (like you have above). Whether or not you get time to start implementing it, it is a good idea to document the design tradeoffs considered and the effects of various decisions (such as neutering constant folding when TD isn't around). This is also a good way to get others to help out, -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091112/19ebcd6d/attachment.html>

1. I can't tell Microsoft Security Essentials to ignore anything. Even if I click Allow, it breaks the pull. 2. The issue is not me. I don't download virus infested stuff and I don't visit dangerous sites so I rarely have a need for antivirus solutions. The issue is the newcomer Windows user whom I have to instruct to disable and/or remove his antivirus program if he or she wants to

...can pick it up from here, to discover and fix the missing > and flawed bits, make sense of the installer, etc. and eventually make this > codebase part of common NUT, multi-platform as it is. > > Sone points of interest OTOH: > * c++ and a few drivers are currently effectively "neutered" > * fcntl() code to avoid FD leaks to forked children, is it doable on > Windows? > * loading dlls from one dir, without copies near every exe (see common.c) > * automatically tracking major version number X (from client/Makefile.am) > for LTDL discovery of libupsclient-X.dll...

...can pick it up from here, to discover and fix the missing > and flawed bits, make sense of the installer, etc. and eventually make this > codebase part of common NUT, multi-platform as it is. > > Sone points of interest OTOH: > * c++ and a few drivers are currently effectively "neutered" > * fcntl() code to avoid FD leaks to forked children, is it doable on > Windows? > * loading dlls from one dir, without copies near every exe (see common.c) > * automatically tracking major version number X (from client/Makefile.am) > for LTDL discovery of libupsclient-X.dll...

On 2020-10-09 14:16, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Friday, October 09, 2020 6:29 PM +1300 Rob Kampen > <rkampen at kampensonline.com> wrote: > >> If this reject is due to their spam filtering process, it is actually the >> email author's problem - how they make up their sentences, key words etc. >> and thus the problem will travel with them, to whatever email

...he authentication can be circumvented, by design, by using the render > node. > > From the driver POV there is no distinction between primary and render > nodes, thus we can drop the token. > > Note: the outstanding DRM_AUTH instance is: > - legacy DRI1 ioctl, which is already neutered > > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> > Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/dr...

...at was added to wheel as a part of the process. I then logged out of that and was able to get into my regular account (via the gui) just fine. I removed that spurious account and cleaned things up, but ended up in "first boot" again the next time the machine was rebooted. So, I've now neutered that account, but left it in place and haven't run into "first boot" again. I haven't been able to figure out what caused this, yet.

...nfo - I'm in Active Directory 2003 in Native Mode. Samba is built with local installations of kerberos and openssl to get around deficiencies in the system versions. The platforms are Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3.0, Fedora Core 2 x86_64 and Sun SPARC Solaris 8. I'll gladly supply neutered copies of configuration files, log files and ldap searches, but I think the ability to crank up the logging level of the ldap retrieval functions would be more valuable. Thanks, Scott

The CentOS drive for the HP NC4010 is built. I just needed to use external instead of USB power for my USB CDrom. Go figure... I did this in my hotel room, where they only have wireless. I went down to the 'business center' and used an ethernet drop, but I don't think the registration worked. I didn't know that even for the ehternet drops you have to do that portal thing