search for: neustifte

Hi, Devang Patel wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Andreas Neustifter > <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> wrote: > >> Okay, so the ProfileInfoLoader is working, but when I examine the executions more closely I see that the ProfileInfo generated by the ProfileInfoLoader is immediately discarded, when the SelectionDAGISel kicks in the "No Profile Info&...

Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Well it does look not too good the text is getting to small in this > case, what do you think of this 128x128 version? Hmm, that one has its left wing cut off, that wreaks havoc on the symmetry. The 136x136 version at http://llvm.org/Logo.html seems perfect for websites, though. I...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Albert Graef wrote: > Andreas Neustifter wrote: >> Well it does look not too good the text is getting to small in this >> case, what do you think of this 128x128 version? > > Hmm, that one has its left wing cut off, that wreaks havoc on the symmetry. > > The 136x136 version at http://llvm.org/Logo.html seems perfe...

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 05:44:05PM +0200, Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Well it does look not too good the text is getting to small in this > case, what do you think of this 128x128 version? It looks like an sprite coming from a Megaman game :). My humble opinion is that while the dragon looks nice when large, when small it just feels childish and unp...

Andreas Neustifter wrote: > I'm not an artist, so the simplifying is not so easy for me, but its > true that that is the really hard part. So I did two full-scale sketches > with different texts. Looks nice, even at 256 pixels. Just for the fun of it I sticked it on http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/ (sc...

Sorry, forgot attachment. On 23.07.09 07:40), Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Good Morning. > > On 22.07.09 14:47), Andreas Neustifter wrote: >> Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached >>> patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have >>> with the...

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> wrote: > > If I use  AU.addRequired<ProfileInfo>() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp the > wrong ProfileInfo is used. It uses the "No ProfileInfo" implementation > if ProfileInfo but not the one from ProfileInfoLoaderPass. (Which is > immediate...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) Okay, here comes the next one. I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of the next patches so that you can work on them as you have time. Greetings, Andi - --

Hi, I'm writing a ModulePass that needs critical edges split up. I have the statement AU.addRequiredID(BreakCriticalEdgesID); in my getAnalysisUsage() but the pass never gets executed. I guess I have to request pass execution for each function, but I can't get behind how to do that, since there is no analysis group for that kind of transformation. Thanks, Andi

Hi, Andreas Neustifter wrote: > I'm writing a ModulePass that needs critical edges split up. I have the > statement > > AU.addRequiredID(BreakCriticalEdgesID); > > in my getAnalysisUsage() but the pass never gets executed. > > I guess I have to request pass execution for each function, bu...

Hi Albert, Albert Graef wrote: > Andreas Neustifter wrote: >> I'm not an artist, so the simplifying is not so easy for me, but its >> true that that is the really hard part. So I did two full-scale sketches >> with different texts. > > Looks nice, even at 256 pixels. Just for the fun of it I sticked it on > http://pu...

On 2009-07-31 11:17, Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Hi, > > Albert Graef wrote: > > Andreas Neustifter wrote: > >> Well it does look not too good the text is getting to small in this > >> case, what do you think of this 128x128 version? > > Hmm, that one has its left wing cut off, that wreaks havoc on...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Andreas Neustifter wrote: > > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >> Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) > > > > Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) > > > > Okay, here comes the next one. > > > > I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try...

Hi all! On 11/20/2009 06:29 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Andreas Neustifter wrote: >> >> If I use AU.addRequired<ProfileInfo>() in SelectionDAGISel.cpp the >> wrong ProfileInfo is used. It uses the "No ProfileInfo" implementation >> if ProfileInfo but not the one from ProfileInfoLoaderPass. (Which is >> immediately discarded...

Hi. On 11/17/2009 08:16 PM, Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Hi, > > Devang Patel wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Andreas Neustifter >> <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> wrote: >> >>> Okay, so the ProfileInfoLoader is working, but when I examine the executions more closely I see that the ProfileInfo gen...

Hi, Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Hi Daniel! > > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> I talked with Chris about this the morning, and I think we agreed that >> lli based tests for this stuff are ok, as long as we limit them to >> just a few. The main thing we basically n...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, since I'm planing on a whole bunch of changes in the area of the Profiling Infrastructure I would like to ask humbly if it is possible to have approve-after-commit permission for the following files: include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfo.h include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfoLoader.h include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfoTypes.h

Good Morning. On 22.07.09 14:47), Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached >> patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have >> with the rest of this patch is that it causes a regression in >> llvm-prof's behavior. I t...

Hi Daniel! Daniel Dunbar wrote: > I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached > patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have > with the rest of this patch is that it causes a regression in > llvm-prof's behavior. I tried running edge profiling on the > MultiSource/Applications/aha benchmark in the llvm test-suite, and >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> Thanks, applied as r78247. Next? :) > > Oh my, first he is lagging and now it's all a hurry :-) > > Okay, here comes the next one. > > I'm taking a short vacation next week so I will try to prepare 1 or 2 of > the next patch...