Displaying 20 results from an estimated 26 matches for "neuralscape".
2015 Oct 13
5
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
...nfo/llvm-dev
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
--- end quoted text ---
--
Karen Shaeffer Be aware: If you see an obstacle in your path,
Neuralscape Services that obstacle is your path. Zen proverb
2013 Jan 09
1
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
Karen Shaeffer <shaeffer at neuralscape.com> writes:
> I am also aware of the way too common problem of folks stuck in a time
> warp, because they have dependencies on old libraries that they cannot
> upgrade. IMO, a development effort should not slow the pace of feature
> adoption to support folks who have not planned fo...
2013 May 03
0
[LLVMdev] link native code compiled by llvm and gcc?
...cal kernel
and gcc releases. In the case of RedHat, I believe they require you to build the
kernel with their tool chain. They will not support any modifications to the build
process or the kernel. So, in a situation such as you describe, you are likely on
your own.
enjoy,
Karen
--
Karen Shaeffer
Neuralscape, Mountain View, CA 94040
2013 Jan 09
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...figure out how to upgrade.
I recommend targeting 4.7.2 or later, because all new C++ code on linux is surely
going down that path. You can inconvenience the laggards, or you can turn away the
folks leading the way with new implementations. But you can't satisfy both.
Karen
--
Karen Shaeffer
Neuralscape, Mountain View, CA 94040
2013 May 03
4
[LLVMdev] link native code compiled by llvm and gcc?
Hi,
Is it possible to link native codes generated by different compiler?
the usecase could be:
Linux kernel compiled by gcc want to load kernel module compiled by Clang
(I know there have some problem to compile kernel by Clang currently,
but ignore those problem in here)
I just concern about the call conversion problem, and compatibility
between gcc and clang.
Thanks
.jovi
2013 Apr 29
0
[LLVMdev] A new mechanism to compiler kernel modules using llvm: Defer type evaluation in clang?
...ude
more complex than embedded environments. True linux kernel experts don't even use
debuggers.
Of course I wish you well with your efforts. But you need to fully grasp the ethos
of the linux kernel development community, before you can succeed at such a goal.
enjoy,
Karen
--
Karen Shaeffer
Neuralscape, Mountain View, CA 94040
2013 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] [icFuzz] Help needed with analyzing randomly generated tests that fail on clang 3.4 trunk
...tool for a general purpose compiler would be quite a bit more
difficult, but it is doable. Imagine releasing compilers that are bug free,
at least for a given language and a particular platform. It's doable, and I wonder
why corporations don't invest in it.
enjoy,
Karen
--
Karen Shaeffer
Neuralscape, Mountain View, CA 94040
2013 Jun 25
1
[LLVMdev] [icFuzz] Help needed with analyzing randomly generated tests that fail on clang 3.4 trunk
...tool for a general purpose compiler would be quite a bit more
difficult, but it is doable. Imagine releasing compilers that are bug free,
at least for a given language and a particular platform. It's doable, and I wonder
why corporations don't invest in it.
enjoy,
Karen
--
Karen Shaeffer
Neuralscape, Mountain View, CA 94040
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
2013 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] [icFuzz] Help needed with analyzing randomly generated tests that fail on clang 3.4 trunk
The tests by design are syntactically correct, semantically correct, and have deterministic output.
-moh
From: Nick Lewycky [mailto:nlewycky at google.com]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 4:14 PM
To: Haghighat, Mohammad R
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [icFuzz] Help needed with analyzing randomly generated tests that fail on clang 3.4 trunk
On 24 June 2013 16:10, Haghighat,
2013 Apr 29
3
[LLVMdev] A new mechanism to compiler kernel modules using llvm: Defer type evaluation in clang?
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas
<devlists at shadowlab.org> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what would be the main benefit of this approach vs DKMS which is already widely used ?
>
Thanks Dupas.
I checked DKMS you mentioned, basically DKMS is just a ko and its
sources management tool.
It's not easy to deploy ko source into target machine, and it's more
2013 Jan 09
8
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:24 PM, dag at cray.com wrote:
> I am personally very much in favor of this. C++11 really is a huge leap
> from C++03 in terms of readability, maintainability and safety.
I agree completely.
> Why not C++11 libraries? Implementation/capatability reasons? I don't
> know anything about how the various implementation compare in terms of
> completeness. But
2013 Aug 15
0
[LLVMdev] Clarification between <type> and <ty> for alloca instruction
> I've obviously being playing with C++ too long because my
> instinct immediately told me that dynamically sized arrays on the
> stack are't allowed but apparently that's fine for C99 (g++ also seems
> fine with this is you don't specify -pedantic)
It's all fun and games until someone decides to evaluate sizeof(arr). ;-)
I think a more limited form is coming to
2015 Oct 13
2
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
...nable expression on
this list nor more generally in the LLVM community in any way. And it clearly
invites all individuals to feel welcome. I'm trying to understand what your
specific objections are.
thanks,
Karen
--
Karen Shaeffer Be aware: If you see an obstacle in your path,
Neuralscape Services that obstacle is your path. Zen proverb
2013 Feb 06
2
[LLVMdev] The MBlaze backend: can we remove it?
On 02/05/2013 03:58 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Preston Briggs <preston.briggs at gmail.com
> <mailto:preston.briggs at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> The MBlaze backend seems to be essentially unmaintained since
> 2011. The maintainer (Wesley Peck who is BCC'ed) seems to have
> vanished, and in fact all emails to
2013 Aug 15
2
[LLVMdev] Clarification between <type> and <ty> for alloca instruction
Thanks for the reply.
Please see my inline responses.
On 15/08/13 12:58, Tim Northover wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
>> It is not stated how the "<ty>" type is used as we are told the
>> type of result is type* and sizeof(<type>)*NumElements is the
>> amount of memory so from my perspective it looks like <ty> is
>> never used which would seem to
2013 Sep 19
3
[LLVMdev] extern "C" and namespaces
Can someone confirm whether the following is a known clang bug? I am having a lot of trouble compiling some old legacy code due to this error. I know "using namespace" is horrible but that doesn't make it illegal (g++ accepts this). The fix is easy but there are just too many instances of this in the legacy code. The following is not from the code I am trying to compile but is
2016 May 05
2
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
Am 05.05.2016 um 23:19 schrieb Tanya Lattner:
> Having a code of conduct like this is just as bad as having no code
> of conduct at all. It trivializes the importance of a code of conduct
> and its pretty much impossible to enforce.
Regardless of what kind CoC you have: if it comes to having to enforce
it, the community has stopped being open and welcoming.
So I think this approach is
2015 Oct 13
3
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:16 AM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 13 October 2015 at 18:59, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > We have *not* appointed any such committee at this point.
> > (...)
> > The appeal is to the board of the Foundation. I don't expect the board to
> > *be* the committee
2013 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
Hello all,
Using the Apache Wiki [1] I summed up what can be used simultaneously by gcc,
MSVC and clang.
I mostly considered only the latest versions of the proposals where there were
several, where not there is a link to a note at the bottom. Furthermore I did
not scourge through 3 bug databases and I implicitly trusted the wiki page.
I drew up a list of profiles, listing the base
2015 Oct 13
3
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
On 13 October 2015 at 16:41, Rafael EspĂndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> - *Be welcoming.* We strive to be a community that welcomes and supports
>> people of all backgrounds and identities. This includes, but is not limited
>> to members of any race, ethnicity, culture, national origin, colour,
>> immigration status, social and economic class, educational