search for: network2

On 09/04/2016 05:00 PM, Ulf Volmer wrote: >> IPADDR2=192.168.1.10 >> BROADCAST2=192.168.1.255 <-- >> NETMASK2=255.255.255.0 >> NETWORK2=192.168.1.0 <-- >> GATEWAY2=192.168.1.1 <-- >> >> in case they don't match the first IP address? > > I'm not sure at this point. If you have to add a second ip in another > different network maybe you need a virtual device. OK, some testing has been done....

...true, you can add ipv4 address to the interface in the same way: > > | IPADDR2=172.17.170.101 > | NETMASK2=255.255.255.0 > > There is no need to create a virtual network device. ah ok, and the other values? IPADDR2=192.168.1.10 BROADCAST2=192.168.1.255 <-- NETMASK2=255.255.255.0 NETWORK2=192.168.1.0 <-- GATEWAY2=192.168.1.1 <-- in case they don't match the first IP address? Thanks, Walter

...eds in multiple gigabit/sec networks. So my question is not about this directly. I would like to know if the "netname" configured on each node, is used somewhere in communications between nodes ? I mean, a node A running netname=network1 can connect to node B running Tincd with netname=network2 ? or not ? Thank you for your answer. I could check the source but if someone has the answer quickly it's better :) Flo

Hí everybody, you have a nice day. I am configuring accounting in shorewall /etc/shorewall/accounting and the traffic between eth0 (local network)1, eth2(local network2) and eth3(local network3) &lt;--&gt; eth1(ip public network), works fine. I make the accounting because y want to control the remote vpn access(pptpd) throught shorewall. Which is the way to control vpn /ip/access in /etc/shorewall/accounting? Is my example correct? and if i have diferen...

Hello List, I have a special L2 VPN connected samba deployment setup and I want to make sure the name resolution arrangement is the best for the network. Setup : network 1 + Samba1<<SAME IP range>> <L2 VPN> network2 <<SAME IP range>> + Samba2 I have noticed that the wins server and wins support options are non-inclusive. Samba2: name resolve order = hosts wins lmhosts bcast max wins ttl = 518400 min wins ttl = 21600 wins proxy = No wins server = 1.2....

Hi, I have multiple ppp interfaces that does not correspond to the same network usage. Do you know anything about trying to set definitively the ppp+ name ? or anything to adapt automagically iptables to the real network which is behind each ppp+ interface ? I''ve tooken a look into the IFNAME env var... but it doesn''t seems to work :c/ regards, -- BeTa

On 04.09.2016 17:33, Ulf Volmer wrote: > > OK, some testing has been done. you have to specify > > IPADDR=192.168.0.10 > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > NETWORK=192.168.0.0 > GATEWAY=192.168.0.1 > IPADDR2=192.168.2.10 > NETMASK2=255.255.255.0 > NETWORK2=192.168.2.0 I tried this way; but 'ifconfig' doesn't show these additional addresses ... > please note, that you have to specify only one GATEWAY, there can be > only one default gateway active. sure? thought that IPADDR, GATEWAY, NETMASK and NETWORK must go with, the same with I...

...have experienced the same problem or might have insight as to what's causing the problem. I imagine this might be more of an inherent limitation in gretap than a bug but as I am not to good with coding, I figured I'd ask smarter people ;) network1 box1 network2 box2 network1 801.2q (1504 bytes max) <-> (eth1-br0-gretap eth0) <-> (eth0 gretap-br0-eth1) <-> 801.2q (1504 bytes max) Jonathan

topology : two guest connected to physical LAN (vlan 620 and vlan 621) on host : 1) creating bridge br0 2) creating bridge for guest 1 and guest 2 - to separate traffic 3) virtual network1 : I have default NAT 192.168.122.x DHCP feeding IP to eth1 4) virtual network2 : I want to use 192.168.0.0 for eth0 my question is what would be my virtual network2 looks like : following is default xml : <network> <name>default</name> <uuid>8778244b-1a0c-c15f-c348-26462a07a639</uuid> <forward mode='nat'/> <bridge nam...

Hi, Tinc experts There’s a requirement, where A connect to B, B connect to C; where B knows all the subnets from A and C, but A wouldn’t need to know anything about C, and C wouldn’t need to know anything about A. Any tinc configuration can make this happen? You can think of B is not an interconnect/forwarding node, instead, it only connect to A and C separately. I can think of run two tinc

I am hoping that someone with more experience and knowledge than I can assist me in finding a solution ;) We have a RedHat AS4 box with 5 interfaces. Two interfaces serve two different networks and two interfaces connect to two different uplinks. The fifth interface is our management interface. Since a picture is worth a thousand words I attempted to come up with a diagram:

Hi all, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090722/30afa9ee/attachment.htm

...ands; - sched-* commands; - usb-* commands; - scsi-* commands. In general if you execute "xm help" and "xl help" any command presents in the former but not in the latter is a missing feature. Few items are known to be "work in progress": - network-* commands; - network2-* commands; - block-* commands; Feel free to pick the missing command of you choice and write a simple implementation for it :) Cheers, Stefano _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...55.0 >> >> There is no need to create a virtual network device. > ah ok, and the other values? no other values needed. i assume that the second ip is in the same subnet as the first one. > IPADDR2=192.168.1.10 > BROADCAST2=192.168.1.255 <-- > NETMASK2=255.255.255.0 > NETWORK2=192.168.1.0 <-- > GATEWAY2=192.168.1.1 <-- > > in case they don't match the first IP address? I'm not sure at this point. If you have to add a second ip in another different network maybe you need a virtual device. best regards Ulf

...me >> way: >> >> | IPADDR2=172.17.170.101 >> | NETMASK2=255.255.255.0 >> >> There is no need to create a virtual network device. > ah ok, and the other values? > > IPADDR2=192.168.1.10 > BROADCAST2=192.168.1.255 <-- > NETMASK2=255.255.255.0 > NETWORK2=192.168.1.0 <-- > GATEWAY2=192.168.1.1 <-- Interesting... With these settings, namely GATEWAY2=..., how the arbitration is done (in networks stack) which of gateways is used for packets to be sent outside of networks the machine is on? As far as I know FreeBSD, there can be only one gate...

On 7/25/17 10:51 PM, Bright Zhao wrote: > I can think of run two tinc network which are two processes, other than this, any other easier way to make it as one network, but B doesn’t advertise the info from one side to the other side? Yep, create a different network ( /etc/tinc/network2 ) and make it listen (if listening) on a different port. A <---------------> B <-----------> C 10.1.2.X/24 |  10.1.2.X/24              |  10.2.2.X/24  |  10.2.2.X/24 So each tinc daemon with a /16 is fine. No way for A <--> C, unless, A and C know about each other and add routes...

...gt; > On 7/25/17 10:51 PM, Bright Zhao wrote: >> I can think of run two tinc network which are two processes, other than this, any other easier way to make it as one network, but B doesn’t advertise the info from one side to the other side? > Yep, create a different network ( /etc/tinc/network2 ) and make it > listen (if listening) on a different port. > > A <---------------> B <-----------> C > 10.1.2.X/24 | 10.1.2.X/24 > | 10.2.2.X/24 | 10.2.2.X/24 > > So each tinc daemon with a /16 is fine. > No way for A <--> C, unless, A an...

V I R U S A L E R T Our viruschecker found the 'W32/Sobig-E' virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s): -> lizzi@cnam.fr Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator to do so. For your reference, here are the headers from your email: ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS ----------------------------- Received: from MOTSE-V0BGS5WDD

....Again i want to this rule to work as global for the two different network. If i was not wrong , i have created the rules as tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src network1 flowid 1:11 tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src network2 flowid 1:12 two network will destine to two different class of different rates and priority but the rules for packet shaping is same as rules created by handle function. Simply handle rules in tc -filter will work for globally define or i have to change something new? any help will be a...

I need to be able to set up several server settings (DNS/Zabbix/etc) based on the network that a server is connected to. Could someone show me a straight forward way of doing this? if generate supported pipes I might be able to swing this but apparently I need some help. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google