search for: netwind

Peter, we have met in Cyber space looong time ago, when I was requesting 10:minor numbers for the Netwinder project.... Now I am trying to build a network boot for Xandros distribution. I have it working, however I need to do 2 DHCP cycles - 1 happens in PXE, and then it repeats in my network boot code (based on BusyBox). All I need in the second stage is the NFS image address, passed by DHCP as...

Woody Suwalski <woody at suwalski.net> schrieb am 07.03.03 17:57:26: > > Peter, we have met in Cyber space looong time ago, when I was requesting > 10:minor numbers for the Netwinder project.... > > Now I am trying to build a network boot for Xandros distribution. > > I have it working, however I need to do 2 DHCP cycles - 1 happens in > PXE, and then it repeats in my network boot code (based on BusyBox). All > I need in the second stage is the NFS image...

Hi, I was just wondering whether someone has any experience installing Cent0S on a Qube2. Kind regards, Tom

...installed using the 'alien' utility. Debian development distributions for Alpha, Sparc, and PowerPC are also available under the 'unstable' tree from the FTP site. They will likely be released with Debian 2.1 'Slink.' Development is currently in progress for UltraSparc, Netwinder and Hurd based distributions. >> Why Debian GNU/Linux? o Debian is 100% Free Software. Our goal is to help keep Linux free. o Over 1500 precompiled software packages. o Over 400 developers, the largest staff of any Linux distribution. o The largest pre-release testing program in the...

...integrate Samba in their products to provide file service to Windows desktops. Samba is used by leading vendors such as Cobalt Networks Inc. in their Cobalt Qube ? microserver, Whistle Communications ? in their Whistle InterJet ? Internet connectivity solution, Corel Computer Corp. ? in their NetWinder ? GS server, and by Realm Information Technologies ? in their REALM ? Universal Server product. Realm Information Technologies said of Samba : "REALM chose SAMBA for numerous reasons: it was Open Source, very well supported, easily available and cost effective. Little did...

From: Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> > I have a real problem with this thread. It seems as if, according to some, > someone can only be with or against Red Hat. Yes, that was my major complaint too. > I'm sure Red Hat has made stupid decisions, has adopted buggy software and > are responsible for some of the headaches people have had. And I'm sure > even Red Hat