search for: netmasks

Dear All, Need some help as I was trying to follow the guide below. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC Until the steps of ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationid=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid and my ldbsearch reply with such a result. ldb: unable to dlopen /usr/lib64/samba/ldb/acl.so : /usr/lib64/ldb/libreplace.so: version

I'm unable to have samba4 join an existing AD domain as either an RODC (preferrable) or merely a DC. AD domain is Win2k3, but we recently added a pair of Win2k8 DCs to it. Domain functional level is Win2k3. ### Adding samba4 as an RODC ### # samba-tool domain join -d5 my.domain RODC -U'adminuser at MY.DOMAIN' --server=nysv-vmdc3.my.domain INFO: Current debug levels: all: 5 tdb:

...netmask 1 family ipv6 # ipset add foo ffff:: # ipset list foo Name: foo Type: hash:ip Revision: 0 Header: family inet6 hashsize 1024 maxelem 65536 netmask 1 Size in memory: 16504 References: 0 Members: 8000:: Is there a reason why a netmask of 32 cannot be specified for ipv4 hash:ip sets, and also netmasks of 1,2,3,125,126,127 and 128 can't be specified for ipv6 sets? It would be very helpful for me if an ipv4 netmask of 32 and an ipv6 netmask of 128 could be specified, since I have to have code specifically not adding the netmask option if those netmasks are required. -- Configure bugmail: ht...

Hi, My apologies if this is a FAQ that I missed. This is my first attempt at setting up samba4. Following the howto instructions: kinit administrator seems to work fine. samba is latest git (alpha19). however the join fails (as below): [root at ads bin]# ./samba-tool domain join tribalnova.local DC -Uadministrator --realm=tribalnova.local -d4 GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego'

I gather that ifconfig is a way of setting the netmask in the current shell instead of a persistent value.? I say this because I am running it and see it for my specific network interface, directly after running it. However if I restart the network service the netmask is reverted to the previous value. What is the correct way to set the new netmask for the network interface to make it persistent.

Hi, I installed Samba 4.0.13 from ports and ran.. sudo mv /usr/local/etc/samba /usr/local/etc/samba.3 sudo mv /usr/local/etc/smb.conf /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.3 sudo vi /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.3 # Add realm entry sudo mv /var/db/samba /var/db/samba.3 sudo samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/usr/local/etc/samba.3 --use-ntvfs /usr/local/etc/smb.conf.3 When I try and start I get.. sudo samba

Hello, does anybody know how to achieve the following with SSH... a) accept RSA authentication for all but root from any IP b) accept RSA authentication for root from a couple IPs/Netmasks c) accept password authentication for all but root from a dozen Netmasks d) accept password authentication for root from 3 local netmasks only ie. make authentication depend on the USER,METHOD,CLIENT-IP triplet... Cheers, MaZe.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=841 Summary: Specifying netmask option when creating ipv6 hash:ip is inconsistent Product: ipset Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: default AssignedTo:

CentOS-6.10 We have a host with the following ifcfg file contents: BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST="" DEFROUTE=yes DEVICE=eth1 . . . GATEWAY=X.Y.Z.234 IPADDR=A.B.C.2 IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes NAME="LAN Link - eth1" NETMASK="255.255.255.128" NETWORK="A.B.C.0" NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes PREFIX=25 TYPE=Ethernet USERCTL=no And an aliased ifcfg containing this:

Hi all, I need to (quickly!grrr) update IP addresses for which a given machine will answer. I did this: /sbin/ifconfig eth0:0 xx.xx.xx.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:1 xx.xx.xx.11 netmask 255.255.255.0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:2 xx.xx.xx.30 netmask 255.255.255.0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:3 xx.xx.xx.31 netmask 255.255.255.0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:4 xx.xx.xx.13 netmask 255.255.255.0

I should have mentioned that I tried nmtui but found no settings for a netmask anywhere.? like I said ?. dummy.KM On Thursday, March 14, 2019, 11:39:09 AM EDT, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 15:12 +0000, KM via CentOS wrote: > I gather that ifconfig is a way of setting the netmask in the current > shell instead of a persistent value.? I say this

When I add all interfaces, the internet does not work.... eth0 = interneteth1 = lan ------------------auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 192.168.0.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 gateway 192.168.0.254 auto xenbr0 iface xenbr0 inet static

If you have a working proxyARP setup, will you please post it? I''ve tried to insert a Linux box between the DSL connection and the switch, but I''m getting nowhere. Everything works correctly when all the servers in this network use the switch to get to the DSL. Any box directly connected to the DSL also works correctly. http://www.sjdjweis.com/linux/proxyarp/ makes it sound

On 08.02.19 15:08, James B. Byrne via CentOS wrote: > # ifconfig eth1:192008001 > eth1:192008001 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:25:90:61:74:C1 > inet addr:192.168.8.1 Bcast:192.168.8.255 > Mask:255.255.255.128 > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > Interrupt:17 Memory:feae0000-feb00000 > > Which shows that the network mask is

> Op 23 dec. 2015 om 18:31 heeft Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> het volgende geschreven: > > >> > > If I understand IP networking correctly, you only can have "aliases" of > the interface appear on the _same_ network segment (I'm tempted to say > same class C network) as the main IP of interface, say you have: > > DEVICE=eth0

Hi there, I manage a Samba installation which has been operating very well on Debian Wheezy for a number of years. Up until last week I was running 3.6.25, which (as always until now) I compiled myself. Because of the large number of changes in the recent security patches, I opted to try the Debian 'samba' and 'winbind' packages. I was a little horrified to find that Debian is

If you select an option that's not listed during ipv4/ipv6 setup it will accept it without verification. This corrects that behavior and forces a valid option to be picked. --- scripts/ovirt-config-networking | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/ovirt-config-networking b/scripts/ovirt-config-networking index

Hey I have just installed Samba 3.2.7 on my Debian 4.0 with compile. But I'm trying to to join my Windows AD, and samba returns Using short domain name -- UNDERVISNING Joined 'MAIL' to realm 'UNDERVISNING.LOCAL' return code = 0 First I got return code = -1 I just assumed that this was bad, so I powered on, but now I get return code = 0 but I still can't get any user

Hello, Please bear with my inexperience ;) Some tinc configuration examples available on the Internet include a statement like this: "route add -net $subnet netmask $netmask gw $remote_ip", where $remote_IP is the VPN address of the remote host. Q1: Does this statement modify the behaviour of tinc (as compared to "ifconfig $interface $local_ip netmask $netmask")? Q2: If it

> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM >> >> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every >> > was possible to be able to access the guest from the LAN