search for: netlinks

Thanks for the advice. I had played with NT4 a little bit to see if I could use it for setting up a resource domain for windows 2003 machines- since it looks like you can join Windows 2003 machines to an NT4 domain (so why PCNL can't I don't know), and then establish trusts between NT4 and PCNL. I didn't really want to have NT4 machines in my enviroment any longer than necessary so

Hi, I have been trying to figure out how pid namespaces interact with netlink. netlink uses pids (or really tids I hope?) to address sockets associated with processes. The netlink code passes around pids without caring much about the pid namespace. It does pass around some information about the network namespace, but that doesn't help here because the pid namespace is not necessarily

Hi, I have been trying to figure out how pid namespaces interact with netlink. netlink uses pids (or really tids I hope?) to address sockets associated with processes. The netlink code passes around pids without caring much about the pid namespace. It does pass around some information about the network namespace, but that doesn't help here because the pid namespace is not necessarily

Hey all, I''m looking for more detailed info on the netlink api. I''ve read Andi Kleen''s man pages (which describe themselves as lacking and incomplete), rfc3549 -- Linux Netlink as an IP Services Protocol (which was a nice general overview, but lacking in implementation detail), both the iproute2/ip/tc source and the kernel source (which have no usable

I am trying to establish a domain trust between a Samba 3.024 domain and a PC Netlink 2.0 domain. Currently, we are using PC Netlink as our primary Windows file server and "NT4" domain controller. (Lets say that the domain is called LEGACY and the domain controller LX1) Windows 2003 servers are unable to join a PC Netlink domain (even with the SignOrSeal option disabled.) For

Hello, syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer still triggered crash: memory leak in batadv_tvlv_handler_register 484.626788][ T156] bond0 (unregistering): Releasing backup interface bond_slave_1 Warning: Permanently added '10.128.0.87' (ECDSA) to the list of known hosts. BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88811d25c4c0 (size 64): comm

Hello Syzbot On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:04:03 +0800 syzbot wrote: > >Hello, > >syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer still triggered crash: >memory leak in batadv_tvlv_handler_register > It is not ubuf leak which is addressed in this thread. Good news. I will see this new leak soon. > 484.626788][ T156] bond0 (unregistering): Releasing backup interface

From: Cong Wang <amwang at redhat.com> V5: fix two bugs pointed out by Thomas remove seq check for now, mark it as TODO V4: remove some useless #include some coding style fix V3: drop debugging printk's update selinux perm table as well V2: drop patch 1/2, export ifindex directly Redesign netlink attributes Improve netlink seq check Handle IPv6 addr as well

Right now, you can configure most bridge device parameters via sysfs. However, you cannot either: - add or remove bridge interfaces - add or remove physical interfaces from a bridge The attached patch set rectifies this. With this patch set, brctl (theoretically) becomes completely optional, much like ifenslave is now for bonding. (In fact, the idea for this patch, and the syntax used herein, is

Hi, I have a process which is running as a linux service and assigns IP addresses using netlink to configued interface in linux. For IPv4 addresses i do not see any issue with this assignment. When i try to assign an IPv6 address, the address gets assigned successfully to the interface, but the Neighbour Solication request received for that address is not responded with and hence ping6 from a

Hello Syzbot On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:04:03 +0800 syzbot wrote: > >Hello, > >syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer still triggered crash: >memory leak in batadv_tvlv_handler_register > > 484.626788][ T156] bond0 (unregistering): Releasing backup interface bond_slave_1 >Warning: Permanently added '10.128.0.87' (ECDSA) to the list of known hosts.

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro at nvidia.com> In netdev common pattern, xxtack pointer is forwarded to the drivers to be filled with error message. However, the caller can easily overwrite the filled message. Instead of adding multiple "if (!extack->_msg)" checks before any NL_SET_ERR_MSG() call, which appears after call to the driver, let's add this check to common code.

Hi, I have a working fc14 install with a few virtual interfaces set up, and just noticed the following in messages: Apr 18 13:07:43 fc14 libvirtd: 13:07:43.155: error : interfaceGetXMLDesc:355 : internal error could not get interface XML description (netcf: NETLINK socket operation failed - couldn't find ifindex for interface `br0:0`) Apr 18 13:07:43 fc14 libvirtd: 13:07:43.165: error :

Hi Team, I am writing a new device in QEMU, which opens and reads from Netlink socket from the hypervisor. I need this Netlink socket to support migration of connection tracking entries during VM Live migration. If I am using QEMU command directly to launch the VM, then any operation on Netlink socket works fine. But, If I am using libvirt to create the VM and attaching the device, then I am

Hi Sambas, I have been using the latest Sun version of Samba on my Solaris 9 SPARC Ultra 10 for a long time now. I connect with my W2K PC to mainly play music and make backups. I recently foolishly installed the Sun Solaris PC NetLink 2.0 as an experiment. The NetLink worked but I couldn't easily work out the security - basically I don't use any as it is a home system with only myself

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: libmnl 1.0.3 libmnl is a minimalistic (really!) library that provides simple abstractions to communicate using Netlink sockets. If you're looking for a way to communicate some kernel subsystem and user-space, Netlink provides a nice method to do so. For those not yet familiar with Netlink, I suggest you to read:

Hello Syzbot On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 02:26:02 +0800 syzbot wrote: > > Hello, > > syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer still triggered crash: > memory leak in vhost_net_ioctl > Oh sorry for my poor patch. > ANGE): hsr_slave_1: link becomes ready > 2019/06/13 18:24:57 executed programs: 18 > BUG: memory leak > unreferenced object 0xffff88811cbc6ac0

Hello Syzbot On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 02:26:02 +0800 syzbot wrote: > > Hello, > > syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer still triggered crash: > memory leak in vhost_net_ioctl > Oh sorry for my poor patch. > ANGE): hsr_slave_1: link becomes ready > 2019/06/13 18:24:57 executed programs: 18 > BUG: memory leak > unreferenced object 0xffff88811cbc6ac0

Hi Laine, Sorry to disturb you. It seemed this issue had been fixed in libvirt-1.2.2/libnl-3.2.22/linux-3.12. But we still got the error on PowerPC platform. I'll appreciate if you could give any suggestion. We are not sure if any netlink implementation in kernel space is missed. The scenario is a little complicated. We installed internal PF and VF kernel modules and want to use

Some additional info: The solaris server is Solaris 10 (sparc.) According to man smb.conf, "enable asu support = yes" creates an IPC only "ADMIN$" share. Using the computer management tool from a Windows machine I could verify this was the case. However, the "ADMIN$" share on the PC Netlink server is actually a data share. I did try "enable asu support =