search for: netif_f_gso_shift

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 39 matches for "netif_f_gso_shift".

2014 Dec 17
2
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
...x 74fd5d3..86af10a 100644 > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h > @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) > /* check flags correspondence */ > BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCP_ECN != (NE...
2014 Dec 17
2
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
...x 74fd5d3..86af10a 100644 > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h > @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) > /* check flags correspondence */ > BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCP_ECN != (NE...
2014 Dec 17
0
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
...de/linux/netdevice.h index 74fd5d3..86af10a 100644 --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) /* check flags correspondence */ BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCP_ECN != (NETIF_F_TSO_ECN >&g...
2014 Dec 17
0
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
...de/linux/netdevice.h index 74fd5d3..86af10a 100644 --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) /* check flags correspondence */ BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCP_ECN != (NETIF_F_TSO_ECN >&g...
2014 Dec 18
2
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
.../include/linux/netdevice.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h > >> @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) > >> /* check flags correspondence */ > >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >>...
2014 Dec 18
2
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
.../include/linux/netdevice.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h > >> @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) > >> /* check flags correspondence */ > >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >>...
2014 Dec 17
0
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
...00644 >> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h >> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h >> @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) >> /* check flags correspondence */ >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GS...
2014 Dec 17
0
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
...00644 >> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h >> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h >> @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) >> /* check flags correspondence */ >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GS...
2014 Dec 18
0
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
...ux/netdevice.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h >>>> @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) >>>> /* check flags correspondence */ >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >&g...
2014 Dec 18
0
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
...ux/netdevice.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h >>>> @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) >>>> /* check flags correspondence */ >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); >&g...
2014 Dec 18
3
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
...>>>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h > >>>> @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) > >>>> /* check flags correspondence */ > >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_...
2014 Dec 18
3
[PATCH 01/10] core: Split out UFO6 support
...>>>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h > >>>> @@ -3559,6 +3559,7 @@ static inline bool net_gso_ok(netdev_features_t features, int gso_type) > >>>> /* check flags correspondence */ > >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_TCPV4 != (NETIF_F_TSO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP != (NETIF_F_UFO >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_UDP6 != (NETIF_F_UFO6 >> NETIF_F_GSO_SHIFT)); > >>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_GSO_DODGY != (NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST >> NETIF_F_GSO_...
2014 Dec 17
20
[PATCH 00/10] Split UFO into v4 and v6 versions.
UFO support in the kernel applies to both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols with the same device feature. However some devices may not be able to support one of the offloads. For this we split the UFO offload feature into 2 pieces. NETIF_F_UFO now controlls the IPv4 part and this series introduces NETIF_F_UFO6. As a result of this work, we can now re-enable NETIF_F_UFO on virtio_net devices and restore
2014 Dec 17
20
[PATCH 00/10] Split UFO into v4 and v6 versions.
UFO support in the kernel applies to both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols with the same device feature. However some devices may not be able to support one of the offloads. For this we split the UFO offload feature into 2 pieces. NETIF_F_UFO now controlls the IPv4 part and this series introduces NETIF_F_UFO6. As a result of this work, we can now re-enable NETIF_F_UFO on virtio_net devices and restore
2006 Jul 06
12
kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:1133!
Looks like the GSO is involved? I got this while running Dom0 only (no guests), with a BOINC/Rosetta@home application running on all 4 cores. changeset: 10649:8e55c5c11475 Build: x86_32p (pae). ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:1133! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 0 EIP: 0061:[<c04dceb0>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210297 (2.6.16.13-xen
2007 Apr 18
24
[patch 00/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen hvc console (console=hvc0) *
2007 Apr 18
24
[patch 00/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen hvc console (console=hvc0) *
2007 Apr 18
24
[patch 00/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen hvc console (console=hvc0) *
2007 Apr 18
25
[patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual
2007 Apr 18
25
[patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual