search for: neth

...igure STARTTLS and bind over ldap:// scheme, or disable referrals on the client side ...but a question remain: is the Samba DC response "correct"? I'd expect both AD implementations do the same. This is an ldapsearch command output against Samba DC: ldapsearch -D 'davidep at neth.eu' -w '*****' -H ldaps://neth.eu -b dc=neth,dc=eu '(objectClass=user)' ... # search reference ref: ldap://neth.eu/CN=Configuration,DC=neth,DC=eu # search reference ref: ldap://neth.eu/DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=neth,DC=eu # search reference ref: ldap://neth.eu/...

> From: Jens Kraemer <jk at jkraemer.net> > Subject: Re: [Ferret-talk] Performance before and after optimization > On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 08:49:17PM +0800, Alex Neth wrote: > [..] >> 2) Can I keep a second index so that it doesn''t get locked during >> optimization and then switch to the optimized index? Perhaps the >> index >> is not really locked and it is just using all the CPU? (I am using a >> single CPU server)...

...mail at stuartsierra.com> > Subject: Re: [Ferret-talk] Ferret-talk Digest, Vol 25, Issue 2 > To: ferret-talk at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <314ee0450711071401l97b4be8j5e298d7d24383ea3 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 11/7/07, Alex Neth <alex at liivid.com> wrote: >> Thanks Jens. Any suggestion on how to get a two index solution >> working with acts_as_ferret? > > I rolled my own with methods in my model class, something like this: > > def self.setup_new_index(location) > config = aaf_c...

I have an index with a few hundred thousand records. The index is generally very fast, with sub 100ms responses. However if I start adding records, it gets extremely slow, up to over 2 seconds per query. This is true even if I am not currently indexing until I optimize the index. In order to work around this, I index in bulk and immediately optimize. This is not ideal for the

Hi all I am working on a heavy engineering project. And the requirement is that I needto do a lot of process before I store the data to the db. Now the question is that I want to do the process that I am doing but I want to do it in the background. What I actually mean to say is that..I just want the user to get a msg that Records Saved. But in real I want the process to go on in background.

Hi all, there was a recent thread[1] on rails-deploy about Ferret in which a lot of people complained of problems using it in production. I''ve been using Ferret (with DRb) for many months now with no serious issues. I''m assuming the posters know what they''re doing so I''m guessing they''re just using Ferret in higher-scale environments than me. I

...eve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date ihave imapflags mbox_write_locks = fcntl namespace PUBLIC { list = children location = maildir:/var/lib/nethserver/vmail/vmail/Maildir:INDEXPVT=~/Maildir/public prefix = Public/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = public } namespace ROOT { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { auto = no special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Sent { auto = no special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { auto =...

...end return end @rebuilding = true The big problem was in new_index_for, which always uses the same path, and causes the multiple rebuilds to be stomping on each other. It''s not necessary to fix this after adding the above though. Thanks again. -- Alex Neth Liivid Inc / cribQ www.liivid.com / www.cribq.com On Jan 28, 2008, at 3:45 PM, ferret-talk-request at rubyforge.org wrote: > Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:53:22 +0100 > From: Jens Kraemer <jk at jkraemer.net> > Subject: Re: [Ferret-talk] ferret success stories? > To: ferret-talk at...

I have had to fix a few issues with AAF in order to get it working well for myself in a production environment. I''m using the latest "release" version which is 0.4.1: 1) When there is no index in place, every request starts a new rebuild. While there is some code in place to allow this to happen during testing, personally I see no reason to even test for this,

...btp reg hk 0.64 1 s ger 0.27 1 d tur 0.27 1 s rom 0.24 1 s-f por 0.24 1 s spa 0.23 1 s gre 0.22 1 d-f aus 0.17 1 d uk 0.16 1 s be 0.16 1 d arg 0.15 1 s usa 0.13 1 d-f fra 0.13 1 s neth 0.05 1 s-f pol 0.05 1 d bra 0.04 1 s ko 0.006 1 s un -0.009 2 d-f svi -0.022 2 s-f cin -0.040 2 d ru -0.074 2 d-f mex -0.077 2 s ... ... ... ... and plotting it using dotplot, I specified the script as: libra...

Hi, folks. I am planning on implementing Asterisk in 2006, and need to budget for it now, so I need to know what I'll need to get. My company has about 50 users, and is currently languishing on a very old Comdial PBX. All of our client computers are Macs; our servers are mostly OS X, with a couple Debians and a Red Hat. I am thoroughly experienced at systems administration, and can

I''ve been running some multithreaded tests on Ferret. Using a single Ferret::Index::Index inside a DRb server, it definitely behaves for me as if all readers are locked out of the index when writing is going on in that index, not just optimization -- at least when segment merging happens, which is when the writes take the longest and you can therefore least afford to lock out all reads.