search for: netfenc

________________________________ From: Uday Mhatre<mailto:uday_mhatre at hotmail.com> Sent: ?05-?12-?2014 12:58 To: Andrea Venturoli<mailto:ml at netfence.it> Subject: RE: [Samba] samba 2.2.7a tech issue Just wondering if these samba versions are backward compatible with fedora14 and other Linux distributions. Regards, Uday ________________________________ From: Uday Mhatre<mailto:uday_mhatre at hotmail.com> Sent: ?04-?12-?2014 21:36 To:...

Hello. I've got a Samba server and I'd like it to be master browser and everything else except domain controller (the customers wants a workgroup, not a domain). Lately a Windows 2003 server was added to the net and then I guess it was removed. I keep getting messages like the following in the logs: > Apr 10 03:07:51 apocalypse nmbd[57552]: [2005/04/10 03:07:51, 0]

...uspicious to me: authentication succeeds, but somehow that's not enough. I searched for "SID -> getpwuid failed" but came up with nothing. Relevant part of smb4.conf: > [global] > workgroup = XXXXXXX > netbios aliases=SERVER > server string = NetFence > interfaces = re1 > hosts allow = 127. 192.168.111.0/24 10.1.2.15 > security = user > encrypt passwords = yes > os level = 255 > local master = yes > domain master = yes > preferred master = yes > d...

On 2/17/19 8:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Possible things to check: > Is the ip for vlan1 10.1.2.34 ? Sure. It's the only IP vlan1 has inside the jail; it's shown as an alias on the base host. > Try just setting 'vlan1' You mean change "interfaces=vlan1 10.1.2.34/24" to just "interfaces=vlan1"? It doesn't change anything (still

On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:13:45 +0100 Andrea Venturoli <ml at netfence.it> wrote: > On 2/17/19 8:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > Possible things to check: > > Is the ip for vlan1 10.1.2.34 ? > > Sure. > It's the only IP vlan1 has inside the jail; it's shown as an alias on > the base host. > > > >...

...will move forward with a VM and install an "evaluation" version of W2016 > Essentials and join my existing Samba 4 domain. I fall goes well I'll be > sure to reply here and document > > Thanks everybody.. > > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 2:49 AM Andrea Venturoli <ml at netfence.it> wrote: > >> On 5/4/19 11:15 PM, Robert Wooden via samba wrote: >> >> > Your statement backs up the information that I am "gleaning" from >> various >> > sources that W2012/W2016 Server (Essentials) CAN be joined as a >> > workstatio...

.... >> To add to a difficult day, something along the way apparently ate my >> subsequent emails to the samba email reflector. > > I'm trying to write (and maintain) a page about all Samba/FreeBSD > peculiarity and problems. > > Please, have a look at https://www.netfence.it/sub/sambaonfreebsd/ (and > contribute if you can). > > I hope this is not considered spamming, that's not my intention. No worries, you did not spam the group. It seems that Samba/FreeBSD became a hot mess during the past couple of years. Samba 4.8.7 now works on FreeBSD for m...

...at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: maandag 18 februari 2019 11:34 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Troubles upgrading jailed DC from > 4.8.7 to 4.8.9 > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:13:45 +0100 > Andrea Venturoli <ml at netfence.it> wrote: > > > On 2/17/19 8:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > > > Possible things to check: > > > Is the ip for vlan1 10.1.2.34 ? > > > > Sure. > > It's the only IP vlan1 has inside the jail; it's shown as > an alias...

On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 08:38 +0200, Andrea Venturoli via samba wrote: > On 4/4/19 12:36 AM, Suporte - KONTROL via samba wrote: > > > > Hi Andrew, > > Thanks much for the message. > > > > As I am using FreeBSD 12, that´s the latest SAMBA version available > > via PKG support, although I know it's possible to compile the ver > > 4.10 > > Would

I know this might be half OT, but nontheless Samba is involved. A customer of mine has two Macs with Mac OS X 10.5 and is sharing a folder on one of them. We'd like to avoid any permission problem, so I put the followinf in smb.conf: create mode=0777 force create mode=0777 directory mode=0777 force directory mode=0777 This is usually enough to achieve what I want, with other OSes.

Hello. I see a lot of people having this problem, but found not solution so far. The setup: samba 3.0.37 on FreeBSD 7.3/i386 acting as PDC; a similar BDC (only amd64) and XP clients. Users have roaming profiles on the PDC. What happens is: _ a laptop user disconnects from the network (so the local and server profiles are fully synchronized); _ at home [s]he deletes some files; _ back in the

Hi all, I've got some problems with vista sp1 + samba 3.0.28a vista will not save the profiles nor load them. ! I'm all familiar with the .V2 thing. vista however does create the "profilename.V2" directory, but does not populate it with the data Xp machines work like a charm however. profiles path's are: \\<server>\profiles\testuser so the problem with the .V2 part is

You can add windows server 2012 to samba 4 domain as a domain member (without AD DC role) without any issues. I myself have added multiple windows 2012, 2012r2 and 2016 member servers without any issues. And, what's important, You actually DON'T want to make them DC, because of what Rowland just wrote. Regards, Kacper. W dniu 04.05.2019 o 20:19, Rowland Penny via samba pisze: >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Potential SSL 2.0 rollback Category: contrib Module: openssl Announced: 2005-10-11

On 07/06/15 10:17, Rowland Penny wrote: >> > ldap machine suffix = ou=machines >> > ldap user suffix = ou=users >> > ldap group suffix = ou=groups >> >> 3.6 works without these, why shouldn't 4.2? >> AFAIK, these can help performance, but with 3 PCs and 5 users they >> should practically make no difference. >> BTW, in my case

Hello. Forgive me, but I'm quite new to AD and I've been searching the web for a couple of days, but found nothing relevant... What's exaclty the NSUPDATE option of this port? Is it intended to work with BIND (like the other two in that group)? What are its requirements? Any reference to a tutorial or any other documentation on how to use it? bye & Thanks av.

On 05/04/16 21:28, Rowland penny wrote: >> Choosing NSUPDATE brings in another port/package, named samba-nsupdate >> and described as "nsupdate utility with GSS-TSIG support", which >> installs "/usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate". > > Is this a BSD thing ? I have heard of the python script 'samba-dnsupdate'. My understanding is that it's a

On 05/08/17 11:17, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > I've got a network of FreeBSD servers which traditionally hosted a > classic domain. > I upgraded some months ago, removing the old PDC and BDC and migrating > to an AD DC controller in a jail. > This is working fine with Samba 4.4.13. > > Now I'm trying to add a second DC, so I created a new jail on

On 4/4/19 12:36 AM, Suporte - KONTROL via samba wrote: > Hi Andrew, > Thanks much for the message. > > As I am using FreeBSD 12, that´s the latest SAMBA version available via PKG support, although I know it's possible to compile the ver 4.10 > Would you mind let me know where to get its Source code and possibly some DOC material for FreeBSD compiling? > I will definitively

On 6/26/19 4:50 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > Run: > > pdbedit -i smbpasswd:/var/db/samba4/private/smbpasswd -e > tdbsam:/var/db/samba4/private/passdb.tdb > > Change: > > passdb backend=smbpasswd:/var/db/samba4/private/smbpasswd > > To: > > passdb backend = tdbsam:/var/db/samba4/private/passdb.tdb > > And try again. Thanks. Should I try