search for: netdev_has_any_lower_dev

.... You need >>>>>>> to whitelist VF devices. My port flavours patchset might help with this. >>>>>> May be i can use netdev_has_lower_dev() helper to make sure that the slave >>>>> I don't see such function in the code. >>>> It is netdev_has_any_lower_dev(). I need to export it. >>> Come on, you cannot use that. That would allow bonding without slaves, >>> but the slaves could be added later on. >>> >>> What exactly you are trying to achieve by this? I think i can remove this check.? In pre-register, for backup d...

...u need >> >> > > to whitelist VF devices. My port flavours patchset might help with this. >> >> > May be i can use netdev_has_lower_dev() helper to make sure that the slave >> >> I don't see such function in the code. >> > >> >It is netdev_has_any_lower_dev(). I need to export it. >> >> Come on, you cannot use that. That would allow bonding without slaves, >> but the slaves could be added later on. >> >> What exactly you are trying to achieve by this? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >&gt...

...u need >> >> > > to whitelist VF devices. My port flavours patchset might help with this. >> >> > May be i can use netdev_has_lower_dev() helper to make sure that the slave >> >> I don't see such function in the code. >> > >> >It is netdev_has_any_lower_dev(). I need to export it. >> >> Come on, you cannot use that. That would allow bonding without slaves, >> but the slaves could be added later on. >> >> What exactly you are trying to achieve by this? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >&gt...

...ot by blacklisting, but with whitelisting. You need >> > > to whitelist VF devices. My port flavours patchset might help with this. >> > May be i can use netdev_has_lower_dev() helper to make sure that the slave >> I don't see such function in the code. > >It is netdev_has_any_lower_dev(). I need to export it. Come on, you cannot use that. That would allow bonding without slaves, but the slaves could be added later on. What exactly you are trying to achieve by this? > >> >> >> > device is not an upper dev. >> > Can you point to your port flav...

...ot by blacklisting, but with whitelisting. You need >> > > to whitelist VF devices. My port flavours patchset might help with this. >> > May be i can use netdev_has_lower_dev() helper to make sure that the slave >> I don't see such function in the code. > >It is netdev_has_any_lower_dev(). I need to export it. Come on, you cannot use that. That would allow bonding without slaves, but the slaves could be added later on. What exactly you are trying to achieve by this? > >> >> >> > device is not an upper dev. >> > Can you point to your port flav...

...gt; You need to do it not by blacklisting, but with whitelisting. You need >>> to whitelist VF devices. My port flavours patchset might help with this. >> May be i can use netdev_has_lower_dev() helper to make sure that the slave > I don't see such function in the code. It is netdev_has_any_lower_dev(). I need to export it. > > >> device is not an upper dev. >> Can you point to your port flavours patchset? Is it upstream? > I sent rfc couple of weeks ago: > [patch net-next RFC 00/12] devlink: introduce port flavours and common phys_port_name generation

...ith whitelisting. You need > >> > > to whitelist VF devices. My port flavours patchset might help with this. > >> > May be i can use netdev_has_lower_dev() helper to make sure that the slave > >> I don't see such function in the code. > > > >It is netdev_has_any_lower_dev(). I need to export it. > > Come on, you cannot use that. That would allow bonding without slaves, > but the slaves could be added later on. > > What exactly you are trying to achieve by this? > > > > > >> > >> > >> > device is not an u...

Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:13:52PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >On 4/11/2018 8:51 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:59:48PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >> > This provides a generic interface for paravirtual drivers to listen >> > for netdev register/unregister/link change events from pci ethernet >> > devices with the

Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:13:52PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >On 4/11/2018 8:51 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:59:48PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >> > This provides a generic interface for paravirtual drivers to listen >> > for netdev register/unregister/link change events from pci ethernet >> > devices with the