search for: netcrack

...ing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > Seriously, some of the RHEL-boxes we use, require a particular point release > as well as not allowing any updates to the OS. At all. Any of the vendors on those boxes happen to be Oracle or Netcracker?

...t; > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > > > Seriously, some of the RHEL-boxes we use, require a particular point > release > > as well as not allowing any updates to the OS. At all. > > Any of the vendors on those boxes happen to be Oracle or Netcracker? No, it's Varian/Agilent. A big player in lab instruments. Funny thing, just googled them and apparently they've opensoured the culprit software, and according to the below link, it's not locked to a particular point release anymore! http://openvnmrj.org/Downloading/ It does howev...

With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the opposite with RHEL where admins constrain installations to the point release. What is the case with users on this list who support both? Thanks, Joseph L. Casale