Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "netappliance".
1999 Jun 25
0
ACLs and least surprise (was Samba vs. NetAppliance)
[This is fairly far from the topic of the mailing-list: we may want to
take further discussion to email or the tech list]
Jeremy writes:
> it violates the principle of
> least suprises for the nfs user. ie. They may get access
> denied when the UNIX perms say they should be granted access.
Paul replies:
> But wouldn't it also be a "surprise" when an NFS user finds
1999 Jun 17
6
Samba vs. NetAppliance
Hi,
I'm debating purchasing a NetAppliance fileserver that does native CIFS.
Below is a URL
to a NetAppliance authored paper regarding performance. One of the sections
compares
NFS to CIFS and talks about Samba. Can anyone dispute any of this? Is
there any reason
besides price that I should stick with Samba?
-Ed
Ed Sanborn...
1999 Jun 24
4
No automatic refresh?
Hi!
I've been struggling with this install of Samba 2.0.4b on Linux/x86 2.0.36.
All of the client machines run Windows NT 4, SP 3.
I'm exporting /tmp as pub, and if I right click in the folder and create
a new folder, it doesn't show up until I go to 'view' and 'refresh'.
If I delete something, it doesn't go away until I refresh.
Why?
Output of testparm: