Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "netacgi".
Did you mean:
net_cgi
2004 Sep 10
4
Blocking and compression.
...Duttweiler, "Method
and Apparatus for Carry-over Control in Arithmetic Entropy Coding".
US 5,025,258, June 18, 1991, D.L. Duttweiler, "Adaptive Probability
Estimator for Entropy Encoding/Decoding".
The important one is the second one. The link for it is:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&r=1&l=50&f=G&d=PALL&s1=4905297.WKU.&OS=PN/4905297&RS=PN/4905297
IBM holds the patent for arithmetic encoding. I think. Here is what I
don't understand. The patent was applied for in 1988 and...
2004 Sep 10
2
Blocking and compression.
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 23:44, Josh Coalson wrote:
> Miroslav did some experiments with searching for optimum blocksize.
> from what I remember it made at best a couple percent difference.
> there was a thread about it here a while back.
>
Did his changes make it in? I can think of a coupla ways to approach
this and I'd like to hear about what he tried.
A couple of % doesnt seem
2004 Sep 10
0
Blocking and compression.
--- Wayde Milas <wmilas@rarcoa.com> wrote:
> The last one is truely frightening. AT&T hold the patent. The link
> for
> it is at:
>
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&r=1&l=50&f=G&d=PALL&s1=5025258.WKU.&OS=PN/5025258&RS=PN/5025258
> Trying to read and grok it is mind numbing. the synopsis mentions its
> for arithmitic encoding, but the best I can tell fro...
2009 Nov 12
4
OMG! Microsoft patents sudo! Linux and MacOS dead!
http://blogs.computerworld.com/15082/omg_microsoft_patents_sudo_linux_and_macos_dead?source=CTWNLE_nlt_dailyam_2009-11-12
--
thanks
./francis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091112/1061174b/attachment-0003.html>
2005 Feb 08
21
TCP window based shaping
Does anyone have any pointers on how other people have implemented tcp
window adjustment to do bandwidth shaping?
Granted the basic idea is to set the window size to be RTT * bandwidth,
but a quick squiz at google turns up mostly papers on how to implement
this at the sender end with a view to some new magic TCP
implementation. I''m really interested in notes on how to implement at