search for: nesting

>> I use this method with filtering unused in nested function args and local >> vars >> in my YAFL frontend (not finished :(( - at this moment generate LLVM >> bytecode but doesn't have all runtime suport code writed) > > So do you mean you pass static links for parent function stack frames as > arguments? How do you generate them? > Sorry, I must more

Hello all, hope all is well this maybe outside of libvirt-users.... Can you nest macvtap devices to ultimately receive a real routable ip on the nested vm? I have a nested vm up and running. Both vm and nested vm are centos 7 on arch linux host. The first vm uses a macvtap in bridge mode receives dhcp from an external dhcp server. I start the second vm and dhclient hangs and never receives an

...sume in > OpenStack lingo). And it's not immediately self-evident that the > limitations for the former also apply to the latter. Even for the live > migration limitation, I've been unsuccessful at finding documentation > that warns users to not attempt live migration when using nesting, and > this discussion sounds like a good opportunity for me to help fix > that. > > Just to give an example, > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/inception-how-usable-are-nested-kvm-guests > from just last September talks explicitly about how "guests can be > snapshot/resume...

Here's the situation: We have users who are members of groups and those groups are sometimes members of a 2nd level of groups. If a folder has permissions assigned to a 2nd level group, then the user can not access the share. Doing a "getent group | grep user | grep 2nd_level_group" also returns nothing. Samba seems to not be recognizing that a user is a member of a group under

On 07.02.2018 16:31, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > [Cc: KVM upstream list.] > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 04:11:46PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I hope this is the correct list to discuss this issue; please feel >> free to redirect me otherwise. >> >> I have a nested virtualization setup that looks as follows: >> >> - Host:

...ility for this. At this point I'd just like to contribute to a better understanding of what's expected to definitely _not_ work, so that people don't bloody their noses on that. :) >> So to clarify things, could you enumerate the currently known >> limitations when enabling nesting? I'd be happy to summarize those and >> add them to the linux-kvm.org FAQ so others are less likely to hit >> their head on this issue. In particular: > > The general problem is that migration of an L1 will not work when it is > running L2, so when L1 is using VMX ("nV...

....qr) #Error! #Error in anova.rqlist(object, ...) : Models aren't nested Are the models in fact not nested? If they are nested, is there an easy workaround I could use? Many thanks in anticipation. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/ANOVA-in-quantreg-faulty-test-for-nesting-tp4571994p4571994.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

> As an optimization for shallow nested functions (e.g., 3 levels or less), > it seems to me you could just avoid the stack walking entirely and add > $k-1$ arguments to each function at level $k$, i.e., at most 2 arguments > in all. This may even be an easy first implementation. I use this method with filtering unused in nested function args and local vars in my YAFL frontend

I ran into a problem recently trying to update a package which uses S4 methods using a recent beta of R. I think I can reproduce it with a simple example. I have package called `testpkg' in directory testpkg/. In the R/ subdirectory of testpkg/ I have a file called testpkg.R which contains the following two lines: setClass("testpkg", representation(pts = "list"))

Is there a conventional way to test for nested factors? I.e., if 'a' and 'b' are lists of same-length factors, does each level specified by 'a' correspond to exactly one level specified by 'b'? The function below seems to suffice, but I'd be happy to know of a more succinct solution, if it already exists. Thanks, Tim. --- "%nested.in%" <-

...1 0 17.872 1 1 1 22.925 1 1 1 23.138 I was thinking I could use a linear model to determine whether any of the nested fixed effects or their interactions effect the response, but I could not determine how to specify whether effects were fixed or random, and how to specify nesting. For example: lm(response~ fix1+fix2+fix3) The above, as I understand it, simply asks whether the effects fix1 through fix4 have an effect on the response. However, in reality my experimental design has multiple levels of nesting: fix1(fix2(fix3(fix4))) So, how do I do this? To specify nest...

Hello, As part of my project for my MSc, I am looking for a solution to implement nested virtual machines. My current scenario is: - I have a server with AMD Phenom II X6 1100T and 8GB RAM - virtualization enabled at BIOS. - I have installed 64bit CentOS-5.6 with Xen enabled (let''s call it as base1). - On top of base1 I have also installed 64bit CentOS-5.6 (guest1) with Xen enabled and

On Nov 22, 2004, at 12:34 PM, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: >> As an optimization for shallow nested functions (e.g., 3 levels or >> less), it seems to me you could just avoid the stack walking entirely >> and add $k-1$ arguments to each function at level $k$, i.e., at most >> 2 arguments in all. This may even be an easy first implementation. > > I use this method

...oth currently in Julian date format), the status of the nest at the second check (alive or failed), and the date that the nest hatched (i.e. changed from Incubation stages to Brood-rearing stage). Many nests have more than one record, as there were several nest checks throughout the duration of the nesting attempt. What I want to do is assign a nest Stage variable, either Incubation or Brood-rearing. It's very easy to do so when the second nest check was before the hatch date (incubation), or when the first nest check was after the hatch date (brood-rearing). But I can't figure out a quick w...

Hello Xlord, The CPU does have VT support and I already have the nested KVM enabled. Checking the Linux Kernel release notes I saw that the nested kvm feature was implemented in 3.10 but he EPT support is in 3.12. So Centos 7's kernel which is 3.10 does have the EPT support? Is there a way to check that the EPT support is available in the kernel? Thank you, Laurentiu On Thu, Aug 4, 2016,

...rms, nova suspend/resume in OpenStack lingo). And it's not immediately self-evident that the limitations for the former also apply to the latter. Even for the live migration limitation, I've been unsuccessful at finding documentation that warns users to not attempt live migration when using nesting, and this discussion sounds like a good opportunity for me to help fix that. Just to give an example, https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/inception-how-usable-are-nested-kvm-guests from just last September talks explicitly about how "guests can be snapshot/resumed, migrated to other hypervisors an...

...3 6:28 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > > You mean that LICM and Unswitching should be left for later? For the purpose of exposing scalar optimizations, I'm not sure I agree with that but I'd be interested in examples. Optimizations like LICM, and unswitching can potentially damage perfect nesting of loops. For example, consider this nest: for (i) { for (j) { ... = A[i]; } } The load of A[i] is invariant in the j-loop (assuming no aliased stores), and even if it was not invariant, the address computation code is. A pass of LICM could then generate something like...

I haven't been able to fully make sense of the conflicting online information about whether and how to specify nesting structure for a nested, mixed model. I'll describe my experiment and hopefully somebody who knows lme4 well can help. We're measuring the fluorescence intensity of brain slices from frogs that have undergone various treatments. We want to use multcomp to look for differences between trea...

Dear R-Help, I'm hoping to find a Multinomial Nested Logit package in R. It would be great to find something analogous to "PROC MDC" in SAS: > The MDC (Multinomial Discrete Choice) procedure analyzes models > where the > choice set consists of multiple alternatives. This procedure > supports conditional logit, > mixed logit, heteroscedastic extreme value,

On Jul 29, 2013, at 9:05 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 7/16/2013 11:38 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> Since introducing the new TargetTransformInfo analysis, there has been some confusion over the role of target heuristics in IR passes. A few patches have led to interesting discussions. >> >> To centralize the discussion, until we get