Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "nessecarily".
Did you mean:
nessarily
2003 Oct 11
4
Problems with AGI scripts in Perl and Java
Hi
what can be wrong with * that console does not show any stderr text printed
from agi script?
I am starting with asterisk -vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvrc
VERBOSE command does show text on console but printing of STDERR does not
I tried it from Perl and from Java and in both cases almost the same result,
except in Java more things do not work.
In Java for, for example, SAY DIGITS 123 78# would
2018 Nov 07
2
[PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
...t;no vcpi
> > allocation found for port %p\n", port) or something like that this should
> > be solid.
>
> Hm; that comment is leftover from the fallout of moving the port
> verification
> logic out of the state duplicate functions, but I don't think this would
> nessecarily be a bookkeeping error. If we're going to support fallback
> link retraining, we'll need to make sure that every driver's
> drm_connector->atomic_check() function is idempotent so that if the
> atomic helpers have to pull in more CRTCs to perform modesets on then
> usersp...
2018 Nov 07
0
[PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
...ed and replaced by a WARNING(1,"no vcpi
> allocation found for port %p\n", port) or something like that this should
> be solid.
Hm; that comment is leftover from the fallout of moving the port verification
logic out of the state duplicate functions, but I don't think this would
nessecarily be a bookkeeping error. If we're going to support fallback
link retraining, we'll need to make sure that every driver's
drm_connector->atomic_check() function is idempotent so that if the
atomic helpers have to pull in more CRTCs to perform modesets on then
userspace originally added...
2018 Nov 07
0
[PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
...found for port %p\n", port) or something like that this should
> > > be solid.
> >
> > Hm; that comment is leftover from the fallout of moving the port
> > verification
> > logic out of the state duplicate functions, but I don't think this would
> > nessecarily be a bookkeeping error. If we're going to support fallback
> > link retraining, we'll need to make sure that every driver's
> > drm_connector->atomic_check() function is idempotent so that if the
> > atomic helpers have to pull in more CRTCs to perform modesets on t...
2018 Nov 07
2
[PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:21:14PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> There has been a TODO waiting for quite a long time in
> drm_dp_mst_topology.c:
>
> /* We cannot rely on port->vcpi.num_slots to update
> * topology_state->avail_slots as the port may not exist if the parent
> * branch device was unplugged. This should be fixed by tracking
> * per-port slot allocation