Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "neljap".
Did you mean:
nela
2013 Mar 14
1
Higher compression modes from Flake
On 14-03-13 21:24, Declan Kelly wrote:
> No. I want the tightest possible compression, while remaining 100%
> compatible with the subset that all known FLAC decoders can successfully
> stream or play now in cars, Hi-Fi units, "MP3 players" and cell phones.
> The out and out most widely supported lossless audio format could (and
> should) have a better "bang for the
2013 Mar 14
3
Higher compression modes from Flake
?hel kenal p?eval (neljap?ev, 14. m?rts 2013 19:02:35) kirjutas Declan Kelly:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:06:51PM -0400, benski at winamp.com wrote:
> > Flake is a completely independent codebase. When I used it years ago, I
> > remember it being not only better compression but significantly faster as
>...
2013 Mar 14
4
Higher compression modes from Flake
Flake is a completely independent codebase. When I used it years ago, I
remember it being not only better compression but significantly faster as
well. I believe some of the techniques used in libflake were added to
libFLAC in 1.1.4. However, some of the improved compression in flake was
due to options that are outside the FLAC 'subset', such as larger
blocksize, greater number of
2013 Mar 15
3
flac-dev Digest, Vol 100, Issue 36
...plexity.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marko Uibo <vinyylimees at gmail.com>
> To: flac-dev at xiph.org
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:16:37 +0200
> Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Higher compression modes from Flake
> ?hel kenal p?eval (neljap?ev, 14. m?rts 2013 19:02:35) kirjutas Declan
> Kelly:
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:06:51PM -0400, benski at winamp.com wrote:
> > > Flake is a completely independent codebase. When I used it years ago,
> I
> > > remember it being not only better compression but sign...