search for: negotitate

All, Our users have a softphone client that supports the G723 Codec which we want to use for bandwidth reasons, however we do not wish (or have the funds) to license the codec on our Asterisk servers. We have G723 pass-through working between the clients just fine, however calls fail when terminating with Asterisk itself (i.e. Voicemail) or out to the PSTN due to transcoding issues. If it

...*/ - tftp_opt = tftp_options; - for (i = 0; i < tftp_nopts; i++) { - if (!strcmp(opt, tftp_opt->str_ptr)) - break; - tftp_opt++; - } - if (i == tftp_nopts) - goto err_reply; /* Non-negotitated option returned, - no idea what it means ...*/ - - /* get the address of the filed that we want to write on */ - opdata_ptr = (uint32_t *)((char *)inode + tftp_opt->offset); opdata = 0; /* do convert a number-string to decimal number, just like a...

...ser > > Cant think of much more. > > I will say this again, the Windows 'Guest' user has nothing to do with > the Linux guest user. On a Samba machine, any user can be mapped to > the guest user (usually 'nobody') provided the conditions are right. Yes, but then negotitate is going on, which user is send back from samba to windows? ( withing the smb protocol ?) And keep in mind user "guest" also disabled in windows side... I dont know the depth of this.. As shown in the MS link, ( the one close above here), does say.. SMB1 continues to use guest access...

Background, Client - realtek rtl8111c tftpd version is 5.0 options on use -l -v Client: PXE-EX32 TFTP Open Timeout Server: Jun 12 10:48:38 damar in.tftpd[30132]: RRQ from 192.168.1.107 filename gpxelinux.0 Jun 12 10:48:48 damar in.tftpd[30133]: RRQ from 192.168.1.107 filename gpxelinux.0 Jun 12 10:49:24 damar in.tftpd[30134]: RRQ from 192.168.1.107 filename gpxelinux.0 Jun 12 10:50:36 damar

...wrote: > > I will say this again, the Windows 'Guest' user has nothing to do > > with the Linux guest user. On a Samba machine, any user can be > > mapped to the guest user (usually 'nobody') provided the conditions > > are right. > > Yes, but then negotitate is going on, which user is send back from > samba to windows? ( withing the smb protocol ?) And keep in mind user > "guest" also disabled in windows side... I dont know the depth of > this.. > > As shown in the MS link, ( the one close above here), does say.. > SMB1 co...

On 24/04/19 19:51, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >> Rowland Penny via samba >> Verzonden: woensdag 24 april 2019 12:13 >> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] User mapping/login issue >> >> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:38:58 +0200

I've read several other emails and pages on the wiki but none give any deffinate answers. if you have 20 asterisk servers each with 4 pri's, all running RealTime Extensions and RealTime SIPBuddies from the same MySQL server, what prevents you from putting all 20 servers behind a single load balancer? That way all of your UA's can use the same IP to register to; vs maintaining which

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1402 Summary: [RFE] Support auditing through Linux Audit subsystem Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd