search for: negotit

...transcoding issues. If it possible to build the config into our Asterisk servers so that calls between the softphones defaults to G723 pass-through, whilst all other calls (PSTN, Voicemail etc.) default to GSM as their preferred codec? Is there a way of getting Asterisk to be smart with Codec negotitation and figure out which codec the other end of the call is capable of before negotitating back to the Softphone with the selected codec? I assume you would have to do something in the dial plan? I saw the SIP_CODEC variable, but couldn't make it work. Any advice would be very welcome!...

...*/ - tftp_opt = tftp_options; - for (i = 0; i < tftp_nopts; i++) { - if (!strcmp(opt, tftp_opt->str_ptr)) - break; - tftp_opt++; - } - if (i == tftp_nopts) - goto err_reply; /* Non-negotitated option returned, - no idea what it means ...*/ - - /* get the address of the filed that we want to write on */ - opdata_ptr = (uint32_t *)((char *)inode + tftp_opt->offset); opdata = 0; /* do convert a number-string to decimal number, just lik...

...ser > > Cant think of much more. > > I will say this again, the Windows 'Guest' user has nothing to do with > the Linux guest user. On a Samba machine, any user can be mapped to > the guest user (usually 'nobody') provided the conditions are right. Yes, but then negotitate is going on, which user is send back from samba to windows? ( withing the smb protocol ?) And keep in mind user "guest" also disabled in windows side... I dont know the depth of this.. As shown in the MS link, ( the one close above here), does say.. SMB1 continues to use guest acce...

Background, Client - realtek rtl8111c tftpd version is 5.0 options on use -l -v Client: PXE-EX32 TFTP Open Timeout Server: Jun 12 10:48:38 damar in.tftpd[30132]: RRQ from 192.168.1.107 filename gpxelinux.0 Jun 12 10:48:48 damar in.tftpd[30133]: RRQ from 192.168.1.107 filename gpxelinux.0 Jun 12 10:49:24 damar in.tftpd[30134]: RRQ from 192.168.1.107 filename gpxelinux.0 Jun 12 10:50:36 damar

...wrote: > > I will say this again, the Windows 'Guest' user has nothing to do > > with the Linux guest user. On a Samba machine, any user can be > > mapped to the guest user (usually 'nobody') provided the conditions > > are right. > > Yes, but then negotitate is going on, which user is send back from > samba to windows? ( withing the smb protocol ?) And keep in mind user > "guest" also disabled in windows side... I dont know the depth of > this.. > > As shown in the MS link, ( the one close above here), does say.. > SMB1...

On 24/04/19 19:51, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >> Rowland Penny via samba >> Verzonden: woensdag 24 april 2019 12:13 >> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] User mapping/login issue >> >> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:38:58 +0200

I've read several other emails and pages on the wiki but none give any deffinate answers. if you have 20 asterisk servers each with 4 pri's, all running RealTime Extensions and RealTime SIPBuddies from the same MySQL server, what prevents you from putting all 20 servers behind a single load balancer? That way all of your UA's can use the same IP to register to; vs maintaining which

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1402 Summary: [RFE] Support auditing through Linux Audit subsystem Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd