search for: negociation

Hi All, I've set up Dovecot to use my signed SSL certificate and IMAP client is using STARTTLS on port 143 without secure authentication. The TLS negociation process seems to go through ok but once the negociation is finished the client sends an IMAP LOGOUT message; he does not try to authenticate, below is the Dovecot's info log: dovecot: 2010-06-15 15:37:01 Info: auth(default): new auth connection: pid=3932 dovecot: 2010-06-15 15:37:03 Info: imap...

...eer Planet Telecom, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Yves Sent: Thursday, 17 March, 2005 12:28 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Codec negociation Hi, I've got an Asterisk latest CVS head with oh323 installed. There is one thing I can't understand about the codec negociation. I receive calls in G723&G729, and send them to another gateway who can handle both codecs too. So all I want to do is just passthrou, for both. It seems...

Is there a "cookbook" for setting this up? There are examples for setting up a tunnel between two fixed-address networks (e.g. a remote LAN that needs to be "integrated" with a central LAN over IPSec but I can't find anything addressing the other situation -- remote user(s) where the connecting IPs are not known in advance, such as a person with a laptop or smartphone in a

Hi all, In another series I proposed to add an architecture specific callback to fail feature negociation on architecture need. In VIRTIO, we already have an entry to reject the features on the transport basis. Transport is not architecture so I send a separate series in which we fail the feature negociation inside virtio_ccw_finalize_features, the virtio_config_ops.finalize_features for S390 CCW tra...

Hi all, In another series I proposed to add an architecture specific callback to fail feature negociation on architecture need. In VIRTIO, we already have an entry to reject the features on the transport basis. Transport is not architecture so I send a separate series in which we fail the feature negociation inside virtio_ccw_finalize_features, the virtio_config_ops.finalize_features for S390 CCW tra...

...AX application which translates incoming audio to TIF file. My setup is working ok when I'm using ReceiveFAX in fallback mode (with f option). Then I would like to improve my setup letting ReceiveFAX negociate T.38 with SPA3102. The trouble is SPA3102, as I configured it, seems to refuse T.38 negociation as I'm reading lines like this in Asterisk logs: == Using UDPTL CoS mark 5 [2013-11-05 10:36:50] WARNING[3061][C-00000007]: res_fax.c:1698 receivefax_t38_init: channel 'SIP/myline-0000000e' refused to negotiate T.38 My question is: Any hint on how to configure SPA3102 PSTN Line port...

Hello, I tried to activate SSL on LMTP service, to secure connections between Postfix and Dovecot on my LAN, but Dovecot is not negociating a TLS session with Postfix. If I enforce TLS for LMTP at Postfix's side, communication between Postfix and Dovecot is not working. I put ssl = yes ssl_cert = </dovecot/ssl/ssl-LMTP.pem ssl_key = </dovecot/ssl/ssl-LMTP.key in section protocol

hi, I use the oh323 driver to answer H323 calls. The connection is set up normally. In my extensions.conf file I use: exten => s,1,Answer exten => s,2,Playback(demo-instruct) exten => s,3,Hangup So that when a call is answered i get: *CLI> -- Executing Answer("H323/ip$10.0.3.23:32782/6502", "") in new stack -- Executing

Hi Is there known advices on how to favor PFS with dovecot? In Apache, I use the following directives, with cause all modern browsers to adopt 256 bit PFS ciphers, while keeping backward compatibility with older browsers and avoiding BEAST attack: SSLProtocol all -SSLv2 SSLHonorCipherOrder On SSLCipherSuite ECDHE at STRENGTH:ECDH at STRENGTH:DH at STRENGTH:HIGH:-SSLv3-SHA1:-TLSv10

...iling list because I have an issue using lftp and I would love to have more infos about features available on the LFTP version provided by CentOS 6. I try to connect to a ftp server in secured mode using FTPS explicit and I would love to use TLSv1.2. After several tries, I understood that the TLS negociation was not possible using TLSv1.2 (It works only with TLSv1.1) but my issue is I don't understand why : - The GNU TLS Library provided by CentOS is TLSv1.2 compliant. I can use gnutls-cli in order to make a TLSv1.2 connection - It also works pefectly with an openssl client, so it's not a...

On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 01:36 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We just need to figure out how to deal with devices that deviate > from the default. One things is that VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM really > should become VIRTIO_F_PLATFORM_DMA to cover the cases of non-iommu > dma tweaks (offsets, cache flushing), which seems well in spirit of > the original design. I don't completely

On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 01:36 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We just need to figure out how to deal with devices that deviate > from the default. One things is that VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM really > should become VIRTIO_F_PLATFORM_DMA to cover the cases of non-iommu > dma tweaks (offsets, cache flushing), which seems well in spirit of > the original design. I don't completely

...ktop environments / graphical applications and about how to make things better for the developers who build them. Given that the conference is located at Google, we would welcome topics related to Android and Chromebooks. We would also like to hear about Virtual Reality and end-to-end buffer format negociation. If you're not sure if something might fit, mail me or add it to the ideas list found in the program page. The conference is free of charge and open to the general public. If you plan on coming, please add yourself to the attendees list. We'll use this list to make badges and plan for the...

...with outgoing calls. So the incoming calls negociate in ulaw only and the callee side doesn't ear the caller.... I review my ip routes, it's okay because I see the RTP in both way by running ethereal. I don't see what is the problem. So ideally, Asterisk will be able to drive the codec negociation for incoming calls, but I don't know how that is possible. Asterisk 1.2.35 runs under Redhat Enterprise 4 To conclude, I don't understand the following logs : chan_mgcp.c:1656 find_subchannel_and_lock: Gateway '020202020202' (and thus its endpoint 'virtual/nat-timeout') d...

On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 16:23:01 +0200 Pierre Morel <pmorel at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > In another series I proposed to add an architecture specific > callback to fail feature negociation on architecture need. > > In VIRTIO, we already have an entry to reject the features on the > transport basis. > > Transport is not architecture so I send a separate series in which > we fail the feature negociation inside virtio_ccw_finalize_features, > the virtio_config_ops...

Hi I made some work using samba 2.0.6. I use large directory, more than 10000 file. The time to have a list from window NT is very big 2Minuts. I spy a little the dialog and I see that the negociation for exange files name is limited to 170 filenames and a buffer to 16387 octets. Do you know a way to change this ? I tryed without result, max xmit = 60000 packet size= 60000 For dialog Window/Window I change on the server side the registry HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentCo...

...lved "smbclient tar starts throwing SMB signature errors after 750MB of data or so" error, I came across this apparent inconsistency... >From the smb.conf man page: "client use spnego (G) This variable controls controls whether samba clients will try to use Simple and Protected NEGOciation (as specified by rfc2478) with WindowsXP and Windows2000 servers to agree upon an authentication mechanism. SPNEGO client support for SMB Signing is currently broken, so you might want to turn this option off when operating with Windows 2003 domain controllers in particular." >From the Off...

Hello, I am running asterisk 1.4. For argument's sake I have 4 telephones. 2 support video, 2 do not. Calls between phones work fine and codecs are properly negociated. I have videosupport=yes in sip.conf and when the two video phones communicate I have video. I call meet me with this command EXEC MEETME 1234|d SIP looks like this : -- AGI Script Executing Application: (MeetMe)

Anyone out there using NetLogic DIDs? And have inbound working? I got outbound working, but no joy so far with inbound. Here are the relevant parts from my conf files: iax.conf [general] tos=lowdelay jitterbuffer=no register => username:secret@zoot.netlogic.net [netlogic] type=friend host=dynamic context=sourcekit-main auth=plaintext username= secret= disallow=all allow=ulaw allow=all

On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 18:41 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I don't completely agree: > > > > 1 - VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM is a property of the "other side", ie qemu > > for example. It indicates that the peer bypasses the normal platform > > iommu. The platform code in the guest has no real way to know that this > > is the case, this is