search for: neglibly

I was wandering how much is the overhead of virtual function calls of TargetInfo member functions. TargetInfo handles platform-specific details, and we have target-specific subclasses of that class. The subclasses override functions defined in TargetInfo. The TargetInfo member functions are called multiple times for each relocation. So the cost of virtual function calls may be non-neglible. That

Hi - I have a data frame with a large number of observations (62,000 rows, but only 2 columns - a character ID and a result list). Sample: > my.df <- data.frame(id=c("ID1", "ID2", "ID3"), result=1:3) > my.df id result 1 ID1 1 2 ID2 2 3 ID3 3 I have a list of ID vectors. This list will have anywhere from 100 to 1000 members, and

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > I believe the relocation stuff that Rafael is currently working on will > make this a non-issue (it will make relocation application much friendlier > for the CPU). > I don't think Rafael's patch would make this a non-issue. He's making scanRelocs to create data, which would reduce the

Dear subscribers, we are sending notifications for three vulnerabilities, - CVE-2020-10957 - CVE-2020-10958 - CVE-2020-10967 Please find them below --- Aki Tuomi Open-Xchange Oy ------------------ Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-05-18 Product: Dovecot Vendor: OX Software GmbH Internal reference: DOV-3784 Vulnerability type: NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476) Vulnerable version:

Dear subscribers, we are sending notifications for three vulnerabilities, - CVE-2020-10957 - CVE-2020-10958 - CVE-2020-10967 Please find them below --- Aki Tuomi Open-Xchange Oy ------------------ Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-05-18 Product: Dovecot Vendor: OX Software GmbH Internal reference: DOV-3784 Vulnerability type: NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476) Vulnerable version:

I believe the relocation stuff that Rafael is currently working on will make this a non-issue (it will make relocation application much friendlier for the CPU). However, even in the current scheme, since the target is fixed, all the indirect call sites should be monomorphic and so there shouldn't be much branch-prediction cost (certainly nothing that would cause 1.8% performance delta for the

> On Mar 30, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com <mailto:chisophugis at gmail.com>> wrote: > I believe the relocation stuff that Rafael is currently working on will make this a non-issue (it will make relocation application much friendlier for the CPU).

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I believe the relocation stuff that Rafael is currently working on will >> make this a non-issue (it will make relocation application much friendlier >> for the CPU). >> > > I don't think

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I believe the relocation stuff that Rafael is currently working on will >>> make

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> >>> wrote:

In OLS 2005, we described the work that we have been doing in VMware with respect a common interface for paravirtualization of Linux. We shared the general vision in Rik's virtualization BoF. This note is an update on our further work on the Virtual Machine Interface, VMI. The patches provided have been tested on 2.6.16-rc6. We are currently recollecting performance information for the new

In OLS 2005, we described the work that we have been doing in VMware with respect a common interface for paravirtualization of Linux. We shared the general vision in Rik's virtualization BoF. This note is an update on our further work on the Virtual Machine Interface, VMI. The patches provided have been tested on 2.6.16-rc6. We are currently recollecting performance information for the new

OK, I have been wrestling with this for two weeks now, so somebody please help ! We have an existing Samba Print Server, running RedHat linux, kernel 2.2.19, that runs fine, but is a P133 with 64 mb ram. So we built a new PC, the slowest thing we could buy, a duron 1 ghz with 512 mb RAM. Old printer server is running Samba 2.2.5, new printer server is running samba 2.2.5, and Slackware 8.1,

Hello everyone, I've been looking through the libvirt API to get information about memory page dirtying of VMs. I need these to aid decisions on which VM to migrate. The only thing I found is virDomainGetJobStats() with VIR_DOMAIN_JOB_MEMORY_DIRTY_RATE but that only works when a migration is already running. Is there a way to get information on VMs which are not already migrating? Thanks

Hi all, most of the freedesktop.org servers just got new kernels, so they'll be rebooted tomorrow (Monday) morning UTC. Sorry for the short notice, downtime should be neglible. Regards, -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are

Hi all, most of the freedesktop.org servers just got new kernels, so they'll be rebooted tomorrow (Thursday) morning UTC. Sorry for the short notice, downtime should be neglible. Regards, -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are

Hi folks, FYI: I've finally made some benchmarks for inline-assembler versus intrinsic based mmx code. I've just applied the changes to the fragment reconstruction functions as writing the IDCT and loopfilter have not been ported yet. Nevertheless here are some numbers: As a baseline I'll take the current version from the trunk with all inline assembler functions enabled. Lower

Sean, thanks for reminding this, Alp did commit a class derived from raw_svector_ostream conatining an internal SmallString he called small_string_ostream. The commit was reverted after a day due to a disagreement about the commit approval and apparently abandoned. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140623/223393.html

hi wxrubiers firstly - im right in understanding there is no gem for x86_64? failing that i''ve been trying to compile, but am failing because ld cant find lwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8 im on ubuntu (gutsy) and have wx-windows2.8 headers installed as well as libwxbase2.8dev and libwxgtk2.8-dev can anyone help? thanks glenn

Full_Name: Richard Mott Version: 1.9.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (81.178.233.208) Shouldn't these give the same answer? > pchisq(67.60644,df=1,lower.tail=F,ncp=0) [1] 3.219647e-15 > pchisq(67.60644,df=1,lower.tail=F) [1] 1.996145e-16 >