search for: nefari

For nefarious reasons I won't go into (this is for a quick hack that will be thrown away in a week or two), I'd like my Asm printer to get MBBs in a depth first order. Is there an existing pass or function that will let me do this easily? Thanks, Dan

...curves with popular support across browsers have parameters that were chosen for undocumented reasons. That doesn't mean they are vulnerable but there is a question. OpenSSH uses Curve25519 for ECDSA which has documented reasons for the parameters chosen and thus are far less likely to be nefariously chosen. At least that's my understanding of the situation, which could be flawed.

...veTypes > > how to handle this or would that violate some deep-level assumption? > > This is intentional, but instcombine should clean it up. Are you not > seeing this? If not, instcombine should be improved. The problem is I need to examine this before instcombine and do various nefarious things like spitting out IR and/or generating code without any modifications to improve debuggability of our compiler. Why is this intentional? I've coded up the necessary linker changes but the build is waiting on NFS and a tape drive. Grr... -Dave

On 5 May 2016 at 23:31, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Code owners are the leaders in the LLVM community, and driving/guiding the community *is* what they signed up for. If we need to refine the wording around that, then lets do that. This is what *I* signed up for, and I try to do my best. But I know people that didn't. I think we should refine the wording. >

...asons) I have a deep amount of care for LLVM as a project, and I know > that its long term success is *ONLY* possible through a vibrant and > awesome community as a whole. > > I can only interpret your tone and approach as saying that you think > someone or some people are trying to nefariously harm the LLVM community. > While I have no way to compel you to believe me, I really really do want > the LLVM community to be vibrant and awesome, and it makes me sad that you > apparently assume otherwise. > > -Chris I don't read it as "nefariously harm" so muc...

...g, just to send "BYE", when you could just hangup the leg with AMI (or do just about anything else you might think of). Sometimes it is better to fully explain what you are trying to accomplish, and some folks here can try to steer you towards a workable solution.  It almost sounds... nefarious. Cheers, -- Jeff LaCoursiere StratusTalk, Inc. 703 496 4990 x108 815 546 6599 cell -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20230626/953137c4/attachment.html>

On Apr 13, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Daniel M Gessel wrote: > For nefarious reasons I won't go into (this is for a quick hack that > will be thrown away in a week or two), I'd like my Asm printer to get > MBBs in a depth first order. > > Is there an existing pass or function that will let me do this easily? Check out "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterato...

...;BYE", when you could just hangup the leg with AMI (or do > just about anything else you might think of).  Sometimes it is better > to fully explain what you are trying to accomplish, and some folks > here can try to steer you towards a workable solution.  It almost > sounds... nefarious. > Meant that towards TTT, not Josh, in case that wasn't clear. -- Jeff LaCoursiere StratusTalk, Inc. 703 496 4990 x108 815 546 6599 cell -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/2023...

Hello Warren, On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 15:27 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > So you?ve now sprayed the heap on this system, but you can?t upload > anything else to it because noexec, so?now what? What has our > nefarious attacker gained? So the heap is set with data provided by the (local) attacker who could initialize it to his liking using either of the two memory leaks in the options parsing. The heap, that is entirely under the control of the attacker, now contains a call to a library with parameters such...

> On Jun 3, 2019, at 4:40 PM, Abby Spurdle <spurdle.a at gmail.com> wrote: > >> If you go here: >> https://cran.cnr.berkeley.edu/bin/windows/base >> you see EXE installers for Windows. This contrasts with other programming >> languages that offer both an executable installer and ZIP files that can > be >> extracted and run > > Are you suggesting

...leg, just to send "BYE", when you could just hangup the leg with AMI (or do just about anything else you might think of). Sometimes it is better to fully explain what you are trying to accomplish, and some folks here can try to steer you towards a workable solution. It almost sounds... nefarious. Cheers, -- Jeff LaCoursiere StratusTalk, Inc. 703 496 4990 x108 815 546 6599 cell -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20230627/438eecf1/attachment.html>

...has some affiliation with a view. How can backgroundrb be used for long running processes that are NOT associated with a controller/view? Is this even possible? I understand the nature of Rails is such that it does "just in time" work, but I''m hoping to twist it to my own nefarious purposes. Am I even making sense? Anyone have any ideas on how to do long running processes that are unattached to any specific controller/view instance? cr

Not to stir the pot, but I notice my email address has recently been harvested from this list for spamming purposes. This email address is unique and not used for anything else. I'd distinguish this from spam sent to the mailing list itself, which is obviously different. Is there anything further that could be done to prevent this? -- Dave

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:40 PM Steven Penny <svnpenn at gmail.com> wrote: > > Theres nothing nefarious here. It would allow people to use the R environment > without running an installer. If someone is a new user they may want to try > R out, and installers can be invasive as they commonly: > > - copy files to install dir > - copy files to profile dir > - set registry entries &g...

OK. Trying to build libtiff here. Info from http://www.asteriskguru.com/tutorials/spandsp.html Libtiff from tar: ftp://ftp.remotesensing.org/pub/libtiff 3.8.2 put tiff-3.8.2.tar.gz in /root then tar -zxvf tiff-3.8.2.tar.gz followed by: /configure make clean make But the make had the following error: ./libtool: line 837: g++: command not found make[2]: *** [tif_stream.lo] Error 1

On 03/21/2018 10:34 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > The question is does it allow remote users to login with no password? Yes, and the answer is: no. > If not, then the message ie nearly notification that login without a password is potentially possible. Yes, but a worrying one. That's why i decided to post here. > I have no idea why you would have nopassword=y set in the first place, so it

...e info - I was able to find exactly what I was looking for here: http://codecs.ex-sounds.net/ogg/vorbis/oggenc/ As for what I'm up to, I have a memory-limited port of the Tremor Vorbis decoder that I want to test on some older vorbis encoders for backwards compatibility purposes. Nothing too nefarious. ;) On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silvia at silvia-pfeiffer.de>wrote: > I think if you are only interested in applications, your best bet for > theora encoders is probably ffmpeg2theora, which I believe was used > for most encoding tasks in past years. Note t...

Hello Warren, On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 14:22 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > There are two serious problems with this argument: > > 1. Give me a scenario where this attacker can execute *only* pkcheck > in order to exploit this hypothetical library?s flaw, but where the > attacker cannot simply provide their own binary to do the same > exploit. Short of something insane like

..., my package uses the LAPACK Fortran symbol zsysv. This is not in libRlapack, but is defined on my system in the library /usr/lib64/liblapack.so. * I suspect that the reason the symbol is not in libRlapack is just one of economy, i.e., no use for the symbol in R routines, rather than for other nefarious reasons (?? some fundamental incompatibility with R?) I guess that most of my package users will have an R built without special attention to their lapack library, so will start with something like mtmorgan at gopher4:~> R CMD config LAPACK_LIBS -L/home/mtmorgan/arch/x86_64/R-devel/lib -l...

On Oct 5, 2009, at 3:14 PM, David Greene wrote: > When I compile these separately and run llvm-ld -disable-opt I get > this > unfortunate sequence: > > define i32 @main() nounwind { > entry: > %retval = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2] > %0 = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2] > %"alloca point"