search for: needspairedregist

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "needspairedregist".

Did you mean: needspairedregister
2013 Mar 13
0
[LLVMdev] Problems with 64-bit register operands of inline asm on ARM
...that didn't need pairing, the parser goes bad. I don't think we should force pairing on every inline assembly either. Maybe someone knows how to parse inline assembly in a better way than it is currently being done? If there isn't any, than possibly creating a function to return "needsPairedRegister()" or something would still be ugly, but better than incrementing it inline. cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130313/5ac714b8/attachment.html>
2013 Mar 13
3
[LLVMdev] Problems with 64-bit register operands of inline asm on ARM
...at didn't need pairing, the parser goes bad. I don't think we should force pairing on every inline assembly either. Maybe someone knows how to parse inline assembly in a better way than it is currently being done? If there isn't any, than possibly creating a function to return "needsPairedRegister()" or something would still be ugly, but better than incrementing it inline. cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130313/b2e7d2a3/attachment.html>
2013 Mar 13
5
[LLVMdev] Problems with 64-bit register operands of inline asm on ARM
r175088 attempted to fix gcc inline asm compatibility with 64-bit operands by forcing these into even/odd register pairs the same way gcc always allocates such values. While the fix appears to work as such, it is not always activated when required. The patch makes the assumption that any inline asm statement relying on the even/odd allocation will make use of the %Hn syntax to reference the high
2013 Mar 13
0
[LLVMdev] Problems with 64-bit register operands of inline asm on ARM
...#39;t need pairing, the parser goes bad. > > I don't think we should force pairing on every inline assembly either. Maybe someone knows how to parse inline assembly in a better way than it is currently being done? If there isn't any, than possibly creating a function to return "needsPairedRegister()" or something would still be ugly, but better than incrementing it inline. > > cheers, > --renato > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mail...