Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "needsinfo".
Did you mean:
needinfo
2007 Dec 19
2
[Bug 11492] Bus error (SIGBUS recived)
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11492
riccardo at datahost.it changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
QAContact|eric at anholt.net |swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org
Status|NEEDINFO |NEW
AssignedTo|eric at anholt.net
2007 May 12
20
[Bug 10920] New: glxgears on AGP 10de0028 NV5 [RIVA TNT2/TNT2 Pro] works! (but slowly)
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10920
Summary: glxgears on AGP 10de0028 NV5 [RIVA TNT2/TNT2 Pro] works!
(but slowly)
Product: xorg
Version: 7.2
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
[Bug 105174] New: [regression] BUG unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in kernel 4.15.3
2018 Feb 20
25
[Bug 105174] New: [regression] BUG unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in kernel 4.15.3
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105174
Bug ID: 105174
Summary: [regression] BUG unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference in kernel 4.15.3
Product: xorg
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
2018 Jun 12
9
RFC: Bug-closing protocol
TL;DR: It's okay to close a bug, if you can justify it properly.
Recently there has been a spate of bug-closing with what I would call
inadequate documentation. Comments such as "Obsolete?" or "I assume
it's fixed" could be applied to nearly every open bug we have. While
this does reduce the open bug count--something I have been watching
with morbid fascination