search for: needn't

...t; } else { > // todo; something here > } > MadeChange = true; > } > ... Hi Scott, Using the new support for first-class aggregate values, you should be able to rewrite the above code to use Constant::getNullValue regardless of the type of the alloca. There needn't be a special-case for !isa<PointerType>((*I)->getType()->getElementType()). However, I hesitate to recommend this route; I think it boxes in from supporting escape analysis (where pointer fields within a stack- allocated struct would need to be initialized). I'd suggest...

Hi I'm getting an assert in LowerIntrinsics::InsertRootInitializers because I'm gcroot'ing an alloca to a non-pointer. I was hoping to modify InsertRootInitializers to memset the structure in the case that it's not a pointer, but I'm not sure how to. Can anyone suggest what should go at "todo; something here"? ... for (AllocaInst **I = Roots, **E = Roots +

...; new complexity to LLVM to simplify your tools (single .o rather than > multiple). > As Tobias explained before, if any llvm-based compiler wants to add a feature of generating code for heterogeneous platform (e.g. CPU+GPU) or employ an optimization pass like ours, this intrinsic helps. They needn't revise their compiler driver too much and needn't add a new linker between host bitcode file and device bitcode file (or some others). What they need do is to prepare the device code as a string of llvm IR and add a call to the intrinsic. We believe that there is no need for all these ex...

Hi all, I could really use a file manager or browser to browse my Dovecot IMAP. Ideally it would have hotkeys to move, copy, delete and send. The send part needn't be coded: Just a call to a shellscript which can handle the send the way it's locally the most convenient. Anyone know of such a file manager or browser for IMAP? SteveT Steve Litt Author: The Key to Everyday Excellence http://www.troubleshooters.com/key Twitter: http://www.twitter.co...

To avoid a wrong compiler warning, use unitialized_var(cx) in xen_init_cpuid_mask. cx needn't be initialized for cpuid when ax is 1. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby at gmail.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at xensource.com> Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw at sous-sol.org> --- arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) d...

To avoid a wrong compiler warning, use unitialized_var(cx) in xen_init_cpuid_mask. cx needn't be initialized for cpuid when ax is 1. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby at gmail.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at xensource.com> Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw at sous-sol.org> --- arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) d...

To avoid a wrong compiler warning, use unitialized_var(cx) in xen_init_cpuid_mask. cx needn't be initialized for cpuid when ax is 1. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby at gmail.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at xensource.com> Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw at sous-sol.org> --- arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) d...

I have a question concerning the exception handling tables that we generate. Right now we generate call sites for all of the code in a function, even for code that cannot (or at least shouldn't) throw an exception. E.g., for this code: #include <cstdio> struct Cleanup { ~Cleanup(void) { printf("in cleanup\n"); } }; static void inline_me(void) {

...nalyze the trend of the call number every day. I have thought of two ways: regression and HoltWinters smooth. But when I use regression, I find some day's call number will bcome negative, which is obviously unreasonabe. If I use HoltWinters smooth ,I let the gamma parameter equal to 0 because I needn't analyze the seasonal fact, but the result shows that the increasing trend is too big. I adjust the parameter alpha and beta ,which makes the result better,but I don't know if it's right. In this case of situation,which way is better? Or is there another appropriate method?

...changed even though it was > >> double free or double allocation. > >> > >>> I am currently asking myself if blk_mq_map_request should protect against softirq here but I cant say for sure,as I have never looked into that code before. > >> > >> No, it needn't the protection. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel....

...changed even though it was > >> double free or double allocation. > >> > >>> I am currently asking myself if blk_mq_map_request should protect against softirq here but I cant say for sure,as I have never looked into that code before. > >> > >> No, it needn't the protection. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel....

...mbpasswd requires “security = user”. As I understand the man page, these are mutually exclusive. Now our use case requires for the machine to be joined but also grant access to shares to local users. Share access for domain users is not desirable as clients are mostly automated remote services that needn’t be AD aware. I guess handing net a different smb.conf to perform the join is the obvious quick'n'dirty fix. I’m wondering though if there is a parameter that would make this unnecessary. Thank you, Philipp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Na...

On 06/23/2015 11:49 AM, g wrote: > > hello Ken, > > am i correct to presume that you are getting the "Bcc:" of my post > to the fedora list? g, I'm already subscribed to that list, so you needn't bcc me. I've read your post there. Thanks for that. Very considerate of you. The main issue, getting back into the EWS has been resolved. See my long post there about it. Thanks again. k

Since notification side has been changed to always notify kernel listeners using _LID returning value. Now listeners needn't invoke acpi_lid_open(), it should use a spec suggested control method lid device usage model: register lid notification and use the notified value instead, which is the only way to ensure the value is correct for "button.lid_init_state=ignore" mode or other modes with "button.l...

...H tables smaller and less cluttered if we elide >> those areas which we know don't throw (the functions called are marked >> 'nounwind', etc.). > > Sure, that's what the SawPotentiallyThrowing boolean is for. It is > currently set for any call, but in fact needn't be set for 'nounwind' > calls. When I wrote this stuff 'nounwind' information wasn't available > at the codegen level, which is why this isn't done. In case you care, > doing this would not hurt Ada :) now I think about it further, I guess SawPotentiallyThr...

Good day R-listers, I'm currently working on a panel data analysis (N=17, T=5), in order to check for the spurious regression problem, i have to ?test for stationarity but i've read somewhere ?that i needn't to test for it as ?my T<10 , what do you think? if yes ?is there any other test ?i have to ?perform in such case (a kind of cointegration test for small T?) Any hint would be highly appreciated. Ama. * * ? For searches and help try: * ? http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * ? http://www...

...gets the SID $DOMAINSID-RID - whether in LDAP or the machine itself but when i check the SID of a machine account (for example locally on a windows xp client), it shows up a different SID (checked with psgetsid), but it can join/connect/browse the domain like a charme ??? how is this possible? needn't be the machine SID the same as the DOMAIN SID (of course including the RID) ??? or holds the machine another (local) SID?? where can i get more information about this behaviour? thx micha -- "Matrix - more than a vision" *********************************************...

The IANA has pre-allocated id 4 for ed25519. If waiting on the IANA were a reason to delay applying the SSHFP_KEY_ED25519 patch, it needn't be any longer. I've proposed un-reserving hash type 0 to be a "NULL hash", for those who'd rather publish the public key unhashed. Even if zero for unhashed fails to gain traction, I hope to see something allocated for that. But support for 4/1 ed25519/sha256 in the regis...

...> [...] > f <- z$fitted.values > w <- z$weights > [...] > m <- sum(w * f/sum(w)) > [mss <-] sum(w * (f - m)^2) > [...] > > This seems inconsistent to me. What am I missing? I think you are expecting consistency where there needn't be any. Why do you see an inconsistency here? Those are different calculations. You get expressions like these if you assume observations have variance sigma^2/w, and you're trying to estimate sigma^2. Duncan Murdoch

...7/06/2014 17:50, Ming Lei ha scritto: >> > It would be nice to allocate virtqueues dynamically instead of >> > hardcoding the limit. virtio-scsi also allocates virtqueues >> > dynamically. > virtio-scsi may have lots of LUN, but virtio-blk only has one disk > which needn't lots of hardware queues. If you want to do queue steering based on the guest VCPU number, the number of queues must be = to the number of VCPUs shouldn't it? I tried using a divisor of the number of VCPUs, but couldn't get the block layer to deliver interrupts to the right VCPU....