Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "need_plt_cal".
Did you mean:
need_plt_call
2009 Aug 18
0
[LLVMdev] Build issues on Solaris
Hello, Nathan
> or if it should be a configure test, which might be safer. Are there
> any x86 platforms (other than apple) that don't need PLT-indirect calls?
Yes, mingw. However just tweaking the define is not enough - we're not
loading address of GOT into ebx before the call (on 32 bit ABIs) thus
the call will be to nowhere.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of
2009 Aug 25
2
[LLVMdev] Build issues on Solaris
...dlib>
#include <cstring>
using namespace llvm;
@@ -52,7 +53,7 @@
#define ASMPREFIX GETASMPREFIX(__USER_LABEL_PREFIX__)
// Check if building with -fPIC
-#if defined(__PIC__) && __PIC__ && defined(__linux__)
+#if defined(__PIC__) && __PIC__ && defined(NEED_PLT_CALL)
#define ASMCALLSUFFIX "@PLT"
#else
#define ASMCALLSUFFIX
Index: autoconf/configure.ac
===================================================================
--- autoconf/configure.ac (revision 79390)
+++ autoconf/configure.ac (working copy)
@@ -1150,6 +1150,11 @@
dnl Ch...
2009 Aug 11
6
[LLVMdev] Build issues on Solaris
Hi all,
I've encountered a couple of minor build issues on Solaris that
have crept in since 2.5, fixes below:
1. In lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp, there is:
// Check if building with -fPIC
#if defined(__PIC__) && __PIC__ && defined(__linux__)
#define ASMCALLSUFFIX "@PLT"
#else
#define ASMCALLSUFFIX
#endif
Which causes a link failure due to the non-PLT