search for: necesseri

Dear all, I am thinking of writing my own functions in s-plus (or in R). I just know how to work with S-plus / R built-in functions. Therefore, I'm a beginner in S programming. I am looking for some on-line documentation that is well written about "Programming in S language" where control stuctures / loops / vectorization and necessery sequences of S programming are

Hello, copying idmap is fairly straightforward. 1) on your first DC (that one that has PDC FSMO, and is the source for rsync) create backup of idmap.ldb tdbbackup -s .bak /path/to/samba/private/idmap.ldb it will create idmap.ldb.bak 2) stop samba service on second DC 3) copy idmap.ldb.bak from first dc to second dc, lose the .bak suffix and just copy it over idmap.ldb on second dc 4)

Hello! After process, error continue...... ---------------------------------------------------------------- C: \ Users \ USER1XXX> gpupdate / force Updating Policy ... Unable to update user policy successfully. The following errors for found: Group Policy was not processed. Windows was unable to apply the settings registry-based policy for the LDAP Group Policy object LDAP://CN

Hi Rowland, >> File server config looks exactly like this, except more shares, all >> with same simple config. I know that "use defualt domain" isn't >> necessery, but it's not the issue for me right now. ... > 'SYSTEM' is a Windows group and is meaningless to Unix, it should be > mapped to a Unix ID only on a Samba AD DC and there it is an >

Hello, Thanks for quick reply. File server config looks exactly like this, except more shares, all with same simple config. I know that "use defualt domain" isn't necessery, but it's not the issue for me right now. [global]        netbios name = VS-FILES        security = ADS        workgroup = MYDOMAIN        realm = MYDOMAIN.COM        log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log

Hi All i have a asterisk install from rpm (digium yum) and i wish to install res spandsp i comipled from source using the same asterisk version and copyied the file to the module directory but when trying to load i get this WARNING[18463] loader.c: Module 'res_fax_spandsp.so' was not compiled with the same compile-time options as this version of Asterisk another thing if i install the

hello logcheck team, is there a reason why no dhclient patterns are provided in ignore.d.workstation? in ignore.d.server there are all necessery pattern for dhclient, but a workstation typicaly uses dhcp an those messages reported by logcheck are annoying. are there any good reasons not to include dhclient patterns in ignore.d.workstation or are they simply missed? thank you for any feedback!

compatible with XFS in the package-description) Further I installed the xfs-packages that came with woody: xfsdump_2.0.1-1, xfsprogs_2.0.3-1 and xfslibs-dev_2.0.3-1. Because getfacl and setfacl were missing I downloaded the acltools from SGI and compiled debian binaries with "rules binary" and installed them (acl_2.0.9-1, libacl1_2.0.9-1 and acl-dev_2.0.9_1). FINALLY, I've

Hello! I'll try that. Done with result. Regards, On 11-01-2018 20:45, Kacper Wirski via samba wrote: > Hello, > > copying idmap is fairly straightforward. > > 1) on your first DC (that one that has PDC FSMO, and is the source for > rsync) create backup of idmap.ldb > > tdbbackup -s .bak /path/to/samba/private/idmap.ldb > > it will create idmap.ldb.bak >

Hallo all, last weekend, We have installed a new server with debian squeeze and samba 3.6.5. This sever replace the old samba-PDC and BDC (samba 3.2.5). We also install new server vor ldap and kerberos with a new ldap structure and the move the config from slap.conf to slad.d/. The ldapdatabase ware restore with the necessery changes from dump of the old datatabase. Also the kerberos

The op tells us :        idmap config *:backend = tdb        idmap config *:range = 100-2000        # idmap config for domain MYDOMAIN        idmap config MYDOMAIN:backend = ad        idmap config MYDOMAIN:schema_mode = rfc2307        idmap config MYDOMAIN:range = 4000-99999 I dont know the OS here, but what happens if uid 100 is a linux system users. Then it also maps into

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 21:37:37 +0200 Kacper Wirski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > Thanks for quick reply. > > File server config looks exactly like this, except more shares, all > with same simple config. I know that "use defualt domain" isn't > necessery, but it's not the issue for me right now. > > [global] >       

Ps. To overcome this problem is very simple ( AD or RID ) 1) setup the SHARE where you need user NT Authority\SYSTEM with acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes 2) setup you share with Everyone full access.. ( If you dont like everyone, you need domain users/computers/guest and maybe even more ) 1! You must do this from within windows. ( message access denies when connection, you forgot

Thank everyone for input, It seems that using RID is the way to go. I just tried a few things: 1) - made group, assigned unix GID - added test PC to this group and set this group as "primary group" - added manually to test PC account "uidnumber" on server with samba getent passwd MYDOMAIN\\testpc$ returns nicely testpc$ with UID and GID numbers as set in

Hello, Wile getting this error, can You navigate to this folder via File Explorer in Windows or are You getting access denied error there? Also check which DC was used as logonserver, then check on this DC acl on this policy with "getfacl" and compare output of "getfacl" on the same policy, but on Your DC with PDC FSMO (the one that is the "source" for rsync

Drawbacks for RID, yes, multiple, but maybe it does not apply for you. Read the Advantages and Disadvantages https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_rid My reason for NOT using RID on FILESERVER setups. Only one : File ownership of domain users and groups are lost, when the local ID mapping database corrupts. With Ad, i just remove and

Hi Carlos, > > DC to DC2/DC3 -> > > /usr/bin/rsync -XAaz --delete-after /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol > root at samba-dc102:/opt/samba/var/locks/ > > /usr/bin/rsync -XAaz --delete-after /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol > root at samba-dc102:/opt/samba/var/locks/ looking at your smb.conf file, you are using tdb idmap (default on DC). So the UID/SID mapping will be

Hello, I think I'm not explaining the issue correctly and I'm being misunderstood. I'll give an example: windows 7 machine PC1$ is running AD GPO startup script that forces it to read some files from network share hosted on the centos server with samba 4. The script will be run as windows SYSTEM user (that's the default behaviour of autostart scripts). But since SYSTEM is a

Hi LPH, > Drawbacks for RID, yes, multiple, but maybe it does not apply for you. > > Read the Advantages and Disadvantages > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_rid > > My reason for NOT using RID on FILESERVER setups. > Only one : File ownership of domain users and groups are lost, when the local ID mapping

Hello, I have samba 4.5.10 file server as AD member (AD is also samba 4.5.10). I'm using unix extension for windows rsat to set UIDs for all users and on samba AD member i'd prefer to use idmap = ad to have consistent file permissions across multiple file servers. My issue is with machine accounts. RSAT extension doesn't allow for easy "uid" setting for machine