search for: necessar

...;b', 'c'), I would like to translate the expression object in an R function of, say, 'a', programmatically. Here an example of what I mean. Given: > expr <- expression(a+b+c) a call like: > asFunctionOf(expr, 'a', list(b=1, c=2)) should return a function (not necessarly formally) equivalent to > function(a) a+1+2 Some suggestions? Best regards, Antonio.

Hello, my data is sorted by start.ens (see below). And now I would like to extract all rows (so called* defined row*s) with type==Expression - subset (df, type==Expression) - and the aforegoing type==DNase HS (which is not necessarly row n-1 - assumung that the defined row is n). I dont know how to add this to my subset command. Is that possible? Thanks Hermann > df start.ens fc.trans type end.ens peak end.grcm38 dpeak 1 9191942 0.9379 Expresssion NA NA NA NA 2 9191942 0.9741 Expre...

...owing error message: Error in lm.fit(x, y, offset = offset, singular.ok = singular.ok, ...) : NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 4) Since it first happens with, say the 3rd regression, only the first two are computed. R does not run the 4th regression and so on. I don't want to necessarly remove the columns from the data frame, though, because n is large and there could be many singular fits, implying I had to remove many columns from the data frame. What should I do? Thanks, Dimitri [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all. A statistical question. I have to estimate the variance of the sum: X(1) + X(2) + ...+ X(n) from an observed sample, where X(i) are *correlated* and not necessarly identically distributed. Someone can suggest a simple strategy (I hope by exploiting some already present R package) for obtaining such estimate from an observed vector X[1:n]? Tnx all, Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I am currently trying to learn RoR and there is something I cannot figure out. I have two models: Article and Category, that are HABTM-linked. Everything works fine if I want to select all articles corresponding to a category, with something like @articles = @category.find(@params[:id]).articles However, I have a ''published'' field in my ''articles''

Dear all, This is a pure statistical question, not necessarly related to R. I could not find it in literature. Suppose I'm intersted in a parameter rho, say, equal to: r=beta1/beta2, where beta1 and beta2 come from a linear model y=beta0+beta1X1+beta2X2+.... Fitting the model I can get the (biased) estimate of r=b1/b2, where b1 and b2 are the estimates...

...ity_queue. When CapturePred runs, it calls updateNode which does a std::make_heap on the underlying SUnitVec. This restores the correct ordering. I believe this should also make the scheduler run more like it is supposed to. Previously, the priority queue ordering was incorrect so we weren't necessarly scheduling correctly. The container_reference_wrapper part may be controversial. So I want to get some opinions on this before I submit it. Thanks. -Dave -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ScheduleDAG....

...; # 2.2.22 (fe789d2): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf >> # Pigeonhole version 0.4.13 (7b14904) >> # OS: Linux 4.4.0-45-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS ext4 > This is very dated version of dovecot, you might want to consider using e.g. https://repo.dovecot.org for new version. This is not necessarely the cause here. > > For the SSL error, can you describe more on what are you doing when you get the error? It looks a lot like trying plaintext connection to SSL port. > > Aki

I just installed a certificate on my mail server to Postfix and Dovecot. The certificate is functional on Postfix, but for some reason I keep getting this error. Any suggestions on how to fix it? mail dovecot: imap-login: Error: SSL: Stacked error: error:1408A10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_client_hello:wrong version number Here is my configuration: # 2.2.22 (fe789d2): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf #

...r LLVM 2.8. Currently LLVM has a working JIT on x86, ppc (and perhaps arm?) AFAIK. It'd be great if sparc had JIT support too. I've seen that a very old version of LLVM had Sparc JIT support (don't know how well it worked), but it got removed when the v8 and v9 code was merged. [1] not necessarely a bootstrapped llvm-gcc Best regards, --Edwin

...reetings, <p>my apologies for putting this trash in the mailing list but the topic about SSE run-time option interested me pretty much. Looks like some people is really experienced on the topic. I would really appreciate if somebody could point me to good resources about SSE and Altivec (not necessarly on the net, I'm ready to invest some money if necessary). I already have intel manuals about SSE and I took a look at Intel's document proposed by Ian. I was somewhat shocked by reading a mail posted by Jan-Marc (Date: 14 Jan 2004 02:44:59 -0500). I guess I badly misunderstood it by jum...

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Ferenc wrote: > Thanks for your quick reply! I tried /tmp/debug.log, world-writeable, > but no dice. > >> https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_sieve > > I followed the setup here. I think it works up until the external script > is called (pipe :copy "sa-learn-ham.sh"). That's why I tried echo hi >>

...;real" instruction. I do not think this would be possible: before register allocation, code is SSA form, thus the annotated instruction *must* preceeds the intrinsic annotating it. An alternative is to place the annotating intrinsic before the instruction who ends the specific live-range (not necessarely be an immediate predecessor). Just to point out a problem to cope with: instruction scheduling must be aware of this particular positioning of annotation intrinsics. > It's possible they could introduce extra spills and reloads, in that if > a value is spilled it would be reloaded be...

...gister allocation, code is >> SSA form, thus the annotated instruction *must* preceeds the intrinsic >> annotating it. > Oh yes of course. Duh. :) > >> An alternative is to place the annotating intrinsic before the >> instruction who ends the specific live-range (not necessarely be an >> immediate predecessor). > I'm not sure exactly what you mean I mean, to avoid artificial extension of the live-range, place the annotating intrinsic (I) before the instruction (K) that kills the live-range (but the intrinsic (I) does not have to be an *immediate* predecess...

# dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/xen/webserver.img oflag=direct bs=1M seek=4095 count=1 # dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/xen/webserver.img oflag=direct bs=1M count=4096 root@debian:~# grub-install /dev/xvda Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub The file /boot/grub/stage1 not read correctly. Darkbasic _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

On 09/02/2010, at 3:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote: >> Firstly, the BNE/BA pair should be reduced to a BE (I assume this is the responsibility of AnalyzeBranch and friends that you mention). > > Right. Implementing AnalyzeBranch will allow a bunch of block layout and branch optimizations to happen. > >> However I still

...n: > > # 2.2.22 (fe789d2): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # Pigeonhole version 0.4.13 (7b14904) > # OS: Linux 4.4.0-45-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS ext4 This is very dated version of dovecot, you might want to consider using e.g. https://repo.dovecot.org for new version. This is not necessarely the cause here. For the SSL error, can you describe more on what are you doing when you get the error? It looks a lot like trying plaintext connection to SSL port. Aki

...ipts, which was (apparently) solved after I set: > sieve_pipe_bin_dir = /usr/bin > > You can also use "debug_log" to output stuff from your sieve scripts into > the syslog (don't forget to require "vnd.dovecot.debug" though..) > > Good luck. It is not necessarely a good idea to use /usr/bin here... =) Ferenc, are you using systemd? If so, then you will discover under /tmp some private temporary directories, one of them is for dovecot, and your debug log is probably under there. If you want to strace, try strace -ff doveadm exec imap -u username Aki

...;my apologies for putting this trash in the mailing list but the topic >about SSE run-time option interested me pretty much. >Looks like some people is really experienced on the topic. I would really >appreciate if somebody could point me to good resources about SSE and >Altivec (not necessarly on the net, I'm ready to invest some money if >necessary). I already have intel manuals about SSE and I took a look at >Intel's document proposed by Ian. > >I was somewhat shocked by reading a mail posted by Jan-Marc (Date: 14 Jan >2004 02:44:59 -0500). I guess I badly m...

Hi all, this is a question (really, not necessarly related to R) that I was not able to find in standard textbooks (at last those I've read, of course: Bates and Pinero, Lindsey). I'm fitting a linear mixed model with fixed part: X+A+X:A Just the interaction term X:A is significant suggesting an effect of X only in one group (suppose X is...