search for: neccessarily

...gt;>>>> 1. Does not allow multiple NICs with same mac >>>>> 2. Requires MAC to be programmed by host in the PT device >>>>> (which is often possible with VFs but isn't possible with all PT >>>>> devices) >>>> Might not neccessarily be something wrong, but it's very limited to >>>> prohibit the MAC of VF from changing when enslaved by failover. >>> You mean guest changing MAC? I'm not sure why we prohibit that. >> I think Sridhar and Jiri might be better person to answer it. My >> impre...

...ed security'' ? A simple way which causes the model to restrict the records it throws out in all cases to an appropriate subset? I looked at security frameworks like acts_as_authenticated (which handles only authentication and hence not relevant), and acl_system2 (which is RBAC, and not neccessarily data based). Looking forward to some help! -Ashish -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:54:09AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: >> > > > > Might not neccessarily be something wrong, but it's very limited to >> > > > > prohibit the MAC of VF from changing when enslaved by failover. >> > > > You mean guest changing MAC? I'm not sure why we prohibit that. >> > > I think Sridhar and Jiri might be better perso...

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 04:50:25 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:54:09AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: > > > > > > Might not neccessarily be something wrong, but it's very limited to > > > > > > prohibit the MAC of VF from changing when enslaved by failover. > > > > > You mean guest changing MAC? I'm not sure why we prohibit that. > > > > I think Sridhar and Jiri might be bette...

...- RN ? 23224:41 modprobe -r ipt_state ast% You may also notice that I tried "renice" to bump it all the way to +19 and still it consumes 100% of the CPU. The result for asterisk is that I hear bits of robot noise during conversations, which is annoying as hell but not neccessarily show stopping. But for another 19 days?? Argg! I assume that because it is 'modprobe' it has tickled some kernel bug that is merrily spinning away and won't respond to interrupts. I even tried to stop it with gdb and strace, both of which also hung and had to be killed with -9....

...you always want to fold the extends into the def, as long as the value is always extended the same way (not mixed sign and zero extends). Whole function selection DAGs would make that easy. Right. This is a bit trickier than you make it sound though, because an "i8" addition isn't neccessarily zero or sign extended when the add is done in a 32-bit register. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100818/8c53ac53/attachment.html>

...works fine while I use the floppy images created with rawwrite or dd directly off a floppy, and then eventually resized with mkdosfs. But I've come to the point where I can find no solution. To be specific, I would like to use windows xp pe bootable cd like an image. Anyway, it doesn't neccessarily have to be winxp pe, it could, for example, be any live linux cd (movix, knoppix mame...). I just want to know how to create (or use already created) *.iso image that will work with memdisk's multiple choices. Best regards, -- Ante Lazarusic

Is there some "onfinish" property I can set for an effect so I can perform a custom function (not neccessarily another effect, so this leaves out Effect.Queues)? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3Mb...

Hi all, I have something like this : user has_many lists list has_many items I want to validate that the currently logged-in user is the owner of the list an item is being added to. I can do it in "item/create" by doing something like : class item def create @list = List.new( @params[ "list" ][ "id" ] ) if @session[ "user"

...of syslinux (v2.00, 25-Oct-2002). I've sent an email to Philippe as well, so this is probably usefull just for information (unless it is due to a very strange interaction between these particular versions) Thanks, Allen Clarke. This email is from tMSc and contains information which is not neccessarily the view of the company. If you are not the intended recipient of this email please reply to let us know that the email has been wrongly routed and delete the email from your system.

...> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 04:38:26PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:54:09AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: >> >> > > > > Might not neccessarily be something wrong, but it's very limited to >> >> > > > > prohibit the MAC of VF from changing when enslaved by failover. >> >> > > > You mean guest changing MAC? I'm not sure why we prohibit that. >> >> > > I think Sridhar and...

On Mon, April 10, 2017 4:17 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/10/2017 1:57 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> In what universe are those "consistant" device names, as opposed to >> eth[0...]? And how could it help automated scripts that you can run on >> *any* system you're administering? > > if I have a Intel gigE interface and a Marvell 10g interfaces,

...s want to fold the extends into the def, as long as the value is always extended the same way (not mixed sign and zero extends). Whole function selection DAGs would make that easy. > > Right. This is a bit trickier than you make it sound though, because an "i8" addition isn't neccessarily zero or sign extended when the add is done in a 32-bit register. When you pointed this out earlier, I conceded that I was wrong, but on second thought, I'm surprised that llvm uses i8 adds. Other compilers that I've worked on rely on the integral promotion rules for C/C++ to convert all i...

...Let's go back for a bit. > > What is wrong with matching by mac? > > 1. Does not allow multiple NICs with same mac > 2. Requires MAC to be programmed by host in the PT device > (which is often possible with VFs but isn't possible with all PT > devices) Might not neccessarily be something wrong, but it's very limited to prohibit the MAC of VF from changing when enslaved by failover. The same as you indicated on the PT device. I suspect the same is prohibited on even virtio-net and failover is because of the same limitation. > > Both issues are up to host: if...

...user much: > if you can poke at MAC addresses you probably already can > break networking. I don't understand why poking at MAC address may potentially break networking. Unlike VF, passthrough PCI endpoint device has its freedom to change the MAC address. Even on a VF setup it's not neccessarily always safe to assume the VF's MAC address cannot or shouldn't be changed. That depends on the specific need whether the host admin wants to restrict guest from changing the MAC address, although in most cases it's true. I understand we can use the perm_addr to distinguish. But as said...

...user much: > if you can poke at MAC addresses you probably already can > break networking. I don't understand why poking at MAC address may potentially break networking. Unlike VF, passthrough PCI endpoint device has its freedom to change the MAC address. Even on a VF setup it's not neccessarily always safe to assume the VF's MAC address cannot or shouldn't be changed. That depends on the specific need whether the host admin wants to restrict guest from changing the MAC address, although in most cases it's true. I understand we can use the perm_addr to distinguish. But as said...

...ching by mac? >> > >> > 1. Does not allow multiple NICs with same mac >> > 2. Requires MAC to be programmed by host in the PT device >> > (which is often possible with VFs but isn't possible with all PT >> > devices) >> >> Might not neccessarily be something wrong, but it's very limited to >> prohibit the MAC of VF from changing when enslaved by failover. > > You mean guest changing MAC? I'm not sure why we prohibit that. I think Sridhar and Jiri might be better person to answer it. My impression was that sync'ing...

On Aug 18, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Aug 18, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Bob Wilson wrote: >> I'm looking at llvm-generated ARM code that has some unnecessary UXTB (zero extend) instructions, and it seems to me that doing type legalization as an entirely local transformation is not the best approach. > > That's true, but doing isel as a purely local approach

I'm preparing my new Sendmail mail server with pop3s + smtps where user authentication occurs through Microsoft Active Directory by Winbind daemon. OS is Centos 6.4 and Sendmail is 8.14 Mailboxes will be in this server but how to create them !??! It's necessary to add user by 'useradd' command into /etc/passwd or It's only necessary add new entry in '/etc/aliases'