search for: neccess

On 10/11/2017 09:50 AM, ML wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've read on the gluster & redhat documentation, that it seems recommended to > use XFS over LVM before creating & using gluster volumes. > > Sources : > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/3/html/Administration_Guide/Formatting_and_Mounting_Bricks.html > >

On 10/11/2017 12:20 PM, ML wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've read on the gluster & redhat documentation, that it seems > recommended to use XFS over LVM before creating & using gluster volumes. > > Sources : > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/3/html/Administration_Guide/Formatting_and_Mounting_Bricks.html > >

After some extra reading about LVM snapshots & Gluster, I think I can conclude it may be a bad idea to use it on big storage bricks. I understood that the LVM maximum metadata, used to store the snapshots data, is about 16GB. So if I have a brick with a volume arount 10TB (for example), daily snapshots, files changing ~100GB : the LVM snapshot is useless. LVM's snapshots doesn't

Volumes are aggregation of bricks, so I would consider bricks as a unique entity here rather than volumes. Taking the constraints from the blog [1]. * All bricks should be carved out from an independent thinly provisioned logical volume (LV). In other words, no two brick should share a common LV. More details about thin provisioning and thin provisioned snapshot can be found here. * This thinly

Thanks Rafi, that's understood now :) I'm considering to deploy gluster on a 4 x 40 TB? bricks, do you think it would better to make 1 LVM partition for each Volume I need or to make one Big LVM partition and start multiple volumes on it ? We'll store mostly big files (videos) on this environement. Le 11/10/2017 ? 09:34, Mohammed Rafi K C a ?crit?: > > On 10/11/2017 12:20

Hi everyone, I've read on the gluster & redhat documentation, that it seems recommended to use XFS over LVM before creating & using gluster volumes. Sources : https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/3/html/Administration_Guide/Formatting_and_Mounting_Bricks.html http://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Setting%20Up%20Volumes/ My point is :

hi all, curious is anyone has successfully sent http get packets to userspace for blacklist filtering ... i''d like to do a live cd that would obviate the neccessity to install squid and squidguard, but rather, have iptables send packets to squidguard (or something else) directly ... cheers charles

Hi, I set up Samba to be a Domain Member in W2k ADS Domain. The authentication basically works, the only problem is, that a unix account with the same name is needed on the samba machine for it to work. (The pw though checked against the ad.) How do I get rid of the neccessity to have corresponding unix accounts for the ads users? Thanks in Advance, Rainer

I'm actually seeing from the Apple Support Communities thread that this might all be due to the fact that OS X 10.11.5 clients are requiring SMB signing. Curiously, I noticed that my SMB4.conf file on my FreeBSD server didn't even possess a `client signing` flag. Might all this be resolved if I just add a `client signing = auto` flag for the server's SMB4.conf file, so that the OS X

two problems, pls help...I''m under big pressure at work to fix this! I''m having trouble getting scgi and lighttpd running on windows - here''s what I did: On Win XP, I installed ruby, rubygems, and setup my rails app. All works fine with webrick. I then did: gem install cmdparse and gem install highline (as required for the scgi_rails gem according to

...reeBSD server > > didn't even possess a `client signing` flag. Might all this be resolved > if > > I just add a `client signing = auto` flag for the server's SMB4.conf > file, > > so that the OS X client is talking properly to the server? > > No. SMB signing by neccessity slows things down (without crypto > hardware support). If you're complaining about speed then you > might just have to turn it off. Think carefully before doing > that though. >

Hi, i am now in the process of building a newsletter system which will send out emails to users that have enlisted to a certain group; everything''s going fine, and i an towards the end of this project...now the real part of the story kicks in, where i need to check to see if the thing is working or not. i have been looking over the development.log file, and i see that the emails

I'm using a rather strange config, borne out of neccessity rather than choice at home. My internet 'router' is a Win2000 Pro box running Winroute, and my three Linux boxen (running 7.2/8.0/9.0 RH) are networked thru to the Win box using SNAT on the box I work on (don't ask why - it's just pratical, and I can't afford a hub/switch...