search for: nebul

Anybody know of any Rails-using web sites that really capture the essence of the nebulous Web 2.Oh from which ideas, instruction, and inspiration can be drawn? BTW, what exactly IS Web 2.0? Joe -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

G'Day All, Can anyone give me some direction in setting up the TFTP server on my RadHat ES3 box? I did quite a bit of reading, but I think I am more unsure now than before. I found the information nebulous. TFTP is already installed. I am trying to determine where the root directory for the tftp services is located so I can copy the CISCO 7960 firmware files onto it. Thanks.... Ferg

...18:13, Manoj Gupta via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Therefore, I would like to implement support for this flag (maybe with a > different name), I'd suggest -mdo-what-i-mean; the whole idea is horribly underspecified, and basically rips up the LangRef in favour of a nebulous set of good and bad optimizations (probably as dictated by the ones that have bitten someone who wrote bad code recently and was grumpy enough about it to complain at us). In particular I'm skeptical that the address space solution actually works. What they actually mean is probably not so...

...disagreement over code in the tree. "promptly" is there mostly to avoid suggesting a "necro-revert"; once the code has been in tree for long enough at some point it would be more appropriate to open a bug report or start a fresh discussion. "unresponsive" add some nebulousness, but I think it's an important exception to call out for the "preferably by the original author". -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160308/3cf2d2d4/attachment...

...ment. In Splus I would do this using the function get, e.g., foo <- get(foo,where="dirname") where dirname is the name of a directory containing the Splus objects. In R, argument 'where' of function get appears to be replaced by argument 'envir', whose meaning is rather nebulous for me at the moment..... Thanks for answering me. Sorry if this question has been already asked zillion of times, as it is likely to have been. -- ========================================================================== Jean-Francois Gibrat Tel: +33 (1) 34 65 25 67...

...ts)" and I find the encoding scheme is somehow alien (I can't figure out what it has to do with UTF-8) and it's two following fields to be incomprehensible. There doesn't seem to be any information indicating their purpose either. The location and coding of audio samples is very nebulous in that I don't know where they are or the specifics of how any of their encoding scheme work. More details, links to more information and maybe even some pseudo code would be very helpful. The documentation about the metadata is great... but it kinda goes downhill after that. It would b...

...personal experience and I thought it important to share. It has also been mentioned that it is also true for LLVM itself, and it is. However, the amount of code in LLVM, and the specific nature of its usage and what it is for lends itself to better contribution tracking immediately. Boost is a nebulous piece of software with a wide range of functionality. Dominic

...>> somehow alien (I can't figure out what it has to do with UTF-8) and >> it's two following fields to be incomprehensible. There doesn't seem >> to be any information indicating their purpose either. >> >> The location and coding of audio samples is very nebulous in that I >> don't know where they are or the specifics of how any of their >> encoding scheme work. More details, links to more information and >> maybe even some pseudo code would be very helpful. The documentation >> about the metadata is great... but it kinda g...

...hen it comes to other dc:elements the arguments were about the same: Could > be more clearly defined what they contain and remove redundant attributes > and children elements. (Sorry, should have replied to this at the same time as the last.) I'd be interested which ones. DC is a bit nebulous, but that gives you tremendous freedom too. Atom on the other hand has a very specific target for the things they describe (but they did take a very pragmatic approach to their problem from what I understand, which means they're probably good people to be talking to). -- imalone

...mon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > It has also been mentioned that it is also true for LLVM itself, and it > is. However, the amount of code in LLVM, and the specific nature of its > usage and what it is for lends itself to better contribution tracking > immediately. Boost is a nebulous piece of software with a wide range of > functionality. > If I were worrying about patents, though, I'd be much more worried about LLVM than Boost. Much of Boost is original, and could well be prior art against patent claims, whereas LLVM could easily use a patented register allocato...

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This patch fixes outs/ins of MOV16mr instruction of X86. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.td >

On Mon, April 10, 2017 4:17 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/10/2017 1:57 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> In what universe are those "consistant" device names, as opposed to >> eth[0...]? And how could it help automated scripts that you can run on >> *any* system you're administering? > > if I have a Intel gigE interface and a Marvell 10g interfaces,

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > There is a thread elsewhere on this mailing list illustrating how > important it is for the maintainers of LLVM to keep LLVM usable in a > commercial environment. As such, I would strongly recommend avoiding > Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters, regardless of its license, > for including

...; > > "promptly" is there mostly to avoid suggesting a "necro-revert"; once > the code has been in tree for long enough at some point it would be > more appropriate to open a bug report or start a fresh discussion. > > > "unresponsive" add some nebulousness, but I think it's an important > exception to call out for the "preferably by the original author". > I think this generally sounds right, and matches what we currently expect in practice. To this we might add that it is then the responsibility of the developer requesti...

Ok, I know R isn't an optimal environment for looping (or so I've heard) but I have a need to loop through columns of data and create new columns of data based on calculations within rows... I'm sure there's a help file, but I'm not sure what search terms to use to find it! The problem is that these new columns need to have names that I can later access... Like NewVar1,

...out the same: > > > Could be more clearly defined what they contain and remove redundant > > > attributes and children elements. > > > > (Sorry, should have replied to this at the same time as the last.) > > > > I'd be interested which ones. DC is a bit nebulous, but that gives > > you tremendous freedom too. Atom on the other hand has a very > > specific target for the things they describe (but they did take a > > very pragmatic approach to their problem from what I understand, > > which means they're probably good people to...

Hi, This is regarding support for -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks in clang (PR 9251). Linux kernel uses this flag to keep null pointer checks from getting optimized away. Since clang does not currently support this flag, it often invites comments from kernel devs that clang is not yet *ready* to compile Linux kernel. I have also heard that developers working on firmware, bare-metal tools and

Hi all, I have read Dan North''s post ''Whats in a Story?'' (http://dannorth.net/whats-in-a-story) but I am still having a hard time knowing when I should break requirements up into separate stories or keep them as scenarios. I am currently trying to write a story (stories) for the registration process of a site. The registration process is a multistep process that

.... After updating libvirt it was not working anymore, I thought was a bug but then I realized it was intentional. The function complains about the fact that the <disk> parameter is not accepted anymore. So I started guessing how to solve reading the API documentation and I fall in a completely nebulous world. For what I got: - virDomainSnapshotCreateXML(): According to flags can take system checkpoints (really useful) and disks snapshots. System checkpoints: What I need but I didn't find any way to retrieve the storage file; I'm only able to get the snapshot pointer, quite useless as...

Hey; I''m still very new to puppet having *just* finished the pro puppet book. Going to have to go back to that a few times for re-reading, I suspect. Any rate, I have a client who''s leaning very heavily towards OEM w/the configuration management pack. Despite some fairly exhaustive google sessions, I haven''t been able to find a direct comparison between these