Displaying 20 results from an estimated 47 matches for "ndirs".
Did you mean:
pdirs
2016 Sep 16
5
(Thin)LTO llvm build
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you look for the specific errors in the CMake log and error files?
>
> CMake is very good at not presenting the real issue…
> Here it is trying to build very simple programs to check features
> availability. Like:
>
> #include <strings.h>
> int main() { ffs(0); return 0;
2013 Apr 17
10
xl network-attach SEGV in 4.2 and 4.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
4.2 and 4.1 suffers from SEGV during xl network-attach in
libxl__device_nic_add. In 4.3-unstable it is fixed by:
5420f2650 libxl: Set vfb and vkb devid if not done so by the caller
So either the patch need to be backported to 4.1 and 4.2, or fixed by this one:
- ------
libxl: Fix SEGV in network-attach
When "device/vif" directory
2005 Oct 14
2
Fortran?
In a package, i type a function name and got the following message:
...
tmp <- .Fortran("master", x = as.double(x), y = as.double(y),
sort = as.logical(sort), rw = as.double(rw), npd = as.integer(npd),
ntot = as.integer(ntot), nadj = integer(tadj), madj = as.integer(madj),
ind = integer(npd), tx = double(npd), ty = double(npd),
2016 Sep 16
2
(Thin)LTO llvm build
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 2:18 PM, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you look for the specific errors in the CMake log and
2005 May 02
0
help : Bisect( )
I am using the package of Icens
but for the function Bisect
I do not know what ndir is
it just says the direction of pvec, but what kind of values should I
use ?
thanks for reply
pls give me an example..
Bisect(tA, pvec, ndir, Meps, tolbis=1e-07)
Arguments:
tA: The transpose of the clique matrix.
pvec: The current estimate of the probability vector.
ndir:
2006 Feb 08
2
Warnings from openssh-4.3p1 configure
Greetings:
On a Sun Solaris 8 machine using the Sun Studio 11 compiler:
taz$ ./configure LDFLAGS=-xarch=v9 CFLAGS='-xO3 -xarch=v9'
CC=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc --prefix=/opt/openssh-4.3p1
--with-ssl-dir=/opt/openssl-0.9.8a --with-xauth=/usr/openwin/bin/xauth
--with-default-path=/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/usr/dt/bin
--without-zlib-version-check
checking
2016 Sep 20
4
(Thin)LTO llvm build
The configuration we’re mentioning is a 2-stage bootstrap: You need first to build without LTO your own clang, and then use it for the LTO build.
—
Mehid
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:17 AM, Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote:
>
> I am the author of Polly's/ISL's platform tests and could reproduce
> the problem on my system with this error message:
>
>
2012 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] cmake+ninja build error for compiler-rt sources
Hi All,
I am first time trying build CLANG+LLVM using cmake+ninja build
system. I updated all my CLANG+LLVM sources to current trunk, and I
successfully built it using classic *make* build system. But, trying
to build the same with cmake+ninja build system resulting in following
build failures for compiler-rt sources.
Am I missing something basics here?
====================
cmake command used:
2016 Sep 16
4
(Thin)LTO llvm build
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote:
>
> Cc'ing llvm-dev again in case someone knows what is going on.
>
> That error is coming from a polly configure script, which I don't
> have cloned into my own tree. Not sure why polly would behave
> differently when configuring for ThinLTO. Does polly configure ok
> when
2012 Oct 13
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] cmake+ninja build error for compiler-rt sources
I'm seeing this too. CC'ing the author ubsan stuff.
Richard, I know you were OK with only supporting Clang-bootstraps, but I
don't think that's terribly viable here. We should be able to build ubsan's
runtime with standards conforming code unless there is some fairly extreme
reason not to...
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote:
2012 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] cmake+ninja build error for compiler-rt sources
I use latest cmake+ninja which are built from latest sources.
=================================
> cmake --version
cmake version 2.8.9.20121011-g2876
=================================
--
mahesha
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am first time trying build CLANG+LLVM using cmake+ninja build
> system. I updated all
2011 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Clang stopped compiling?
On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:09 AM, Marcello Maggioni wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest clang/llvm SVN versions and I get
> this error on multiple systems :
Linking, not compiling, but still.
I am getting a similar error when building this morning.
> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
> "clang::Sema::checkPseudoObjectRValue(clang::Expr*)", referenced
2012 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] cmake+ninja build error for compiler-rt sources
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> I'm seeing this too. CC'ing the author ubsan stuff.
>
> Richard, I know you were OK with only supporting Clang-bootstraps, but I
> don't think that's terribly viable here.
Just out of curiosity - why isn't that viable? I'd sort of hope to
treat optional sanitizer runtimes
2006 Feb 06
1
Compile warning report of openssh 4.3p1 on Intel Macs
Hi.
I was compiling openssh 4.3p1 on Apple's iMac Core Duo computer and
came across following warnings.
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: check for missing prerequisite
headers?
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: section "Present But Cannot Be
Compiled"
2006 Apr 23
0
Configuration Warnings OpenSSH 4.3p2
I don't know enough about this to know if these warnings mean that
I can't build it or not.
Also, since I'm e-mailing anyway, how can I tell what options were
compiled into my exiting ssh:
My system is freeBSD 4.11.
PC% ssh -V
OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030924, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090704f
PC%
so that I can do the same thing with the newer version. I don't
want to
2012 Oct 13
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] cmake+ninja build error for compiler-rt sources
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:09 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> wrote:
> > I'm seeing this too. CC'ing the author ubsan stuff.
> >
> > Richard, I know you were OK with only supporting Clang-bootstraps, but I
> > don't think that's terribly viable
2007 Sep 18
2
poll.h vs sys/poll.h on QNX Neutrino
From the ChangeLog:
- dtucker at cvs.openbsd.org 2007/06/25 12:02:27
[atomicio.c]
Include <poll.h> like the man page says rather than <sys/poll.h>.
ok djm@
This was probably ill-advised given the
history of this header file. Some older
systems, and some not-quite-XSI-compliant
systems such as QNX Neutrino, still have
<sys/poll.h> but not <poll.h>.
I
2011 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Clang stopped compiling?
Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest clang/llvm SVN versions and I get
this error on multiple systems :
(Compiling with gcc):
llvm[4]: Compiling cc1_main.cpp for Debug+Asserts build
llvm[4]: Compiling cc1as_main.cpp for Debug+Asserts build
llvm[4]: Compiling driver.cpp for Debug+Asserts build
llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang
2016 Jun 30
4
Help required regarding IPRA and Local Function optimization
Hello Mentors,
I am currently finding bug in Local Function related optimization due to
which runtime failures are observed in some test cases, as those test cases
are containing very large function with recursion and object oriented code
so I am not able to find a pattern which is causing failure. So I tried
following simple case to understand expected behavior from this
optimization.
Consider
2013 Nov 11
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Reminder] LLVM 3.4 Release Branching
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:46:47PM +0400, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > This file is for configure+make build, not CMake, so I'm not sure why
> > it's being included into your build (these failures aren't
> > reproducible for me).
> > Can you please list the exact steps you're doing to build