search for: nctu

Also you might need to check use PostRASchedulerList or PostMachineScheduler, PostRASchedulerList is considered deprecated as mentioned in [1]. [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-April/112348.html HTH, chenwj 2017-06-10 4:03 GMT+08:00 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw>: > Not saying I am totally understand how thing works, but I think you're > misleading > by the DAG in the class name ScheduleDAGInstrs. I only see MachineInstrs > there, no SDNode. And the comment of ScheduleDAGInstrs says, > > /// A ScheduleDAG for scheduling l...

...gh I set CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS to "-fno-strict-aliasing", I see no "-fno-strict-aliasing" in llvm.make-Phase1-Release.log, seems CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS don't work. Do you know the correct way to enable/disable compiler options? Thanks! :) Regards, chenwj [1] http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj/tmp/regression-test.txt [2] http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj/tmp/test-release.txt -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj

Thanks :) From: 陳韋任 [mailto:chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw] Sent: 14 April 2017 12:53 To: Martin J. O'Riordan <martin.oriordan at movidius.com> Cc: LLVM Developers <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Options for timing passes in LLVM? Refer to `llc` document [1], it would be `--time-passes`. [1] http://llvm....

..."nested flattening". It seems that I need a post-dominator tree-based algorithm to flatten the nested loops from the innermost to the outermost, level by level. Is there any feature already existed in LLVM tools? Or similar? On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 2:31 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > If the inner loop can be flatten [1] (not sure if I use the right word), > which means transforming the nested loop into 1-level loop, I think you can > continue using your pass on it. > > [1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18369260/flattening- > a-very-n...

...n >     reproduce your problem. :) > >     Regards, >     chenwj > >     -- >     Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) >     Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, >     Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) >     Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 >     Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj >     <http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/%7Echenwj> > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > _____...

...t; > Best Regards, > Bekket McClane > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Homepage: https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170606/88b834f3/attachment.html>

Hello, I have followed steps given in - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29910051/integrating-llvm-passes/48142693#48142693 <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29910051/integrating-llvm-passes/48142693#48142693>, to integrate my pass with pass manager and run it with clang. I am able to run my pass with opt - opt -mypass but when I try to run it with clang, I always get an error -

Hi 陳韋任, Sorry for the late response. On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:03 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: > I have a native compile and the result seems better... You can compare > the result of cross compile [1] and the native compile [2]. > > Any though? > I'm not particularly happy about the failures here. We need to get to the bottom of them. In the previous email, you tried setting CFLAGS and

Thanks for the info, Philip. I will update the LLVM Programmer’s Manual first. Regards, chenwj Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Homepage: https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj 2017-04-02 18:11 GMT+08:00 Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com>: > Hi chenwj, > > http://llvm.org/doxygen/Statistic_8h_source.html is the correct one. The > other two are remnants from older doxygen deployments. > > Here's an open PR about that sam...

...chenwj > > > > -- > > Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) > > Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, > > Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) > > Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 > > Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj > <http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/%7Echenwj> > > <http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/%7Echenwj> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list >...

...mins. Sorry for the inconvenience! >> >> - Eric > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev > -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Homepage: https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj

...his target"   What's your target? Please attach your example code so others can reproduce your problem. :) Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120925/95dbc063/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm_makefile Type: appli...

...k(BA)); BB = DelayedBBs.back().TempBB.get(); } else { BB = cast_or_null<BasicBlock>(mapValue(BA.getBasicBlock())); } return getVM()[&BA] = BlockAddress::get(F, BB ? BB : BA.getBasicBlock()); } Thanks, Pei On 6/28/17, 10:59 AM, "陳韋任" <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: 2017-06-29 1:55 GMT+08:00 Pei Wang via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Bruce, > > > > Thanks for the explanation. But based on my inspection on the source code, > it seems that materialization is related to lazily readi...

...eduleDAGMILive is a pre-RA scheduler? I assume the post-RA scheduler no need to take care of live interval and register pressure, since RA is done already. Thanks. [1] http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1ScheduleDAGMILive.html Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Homepage: https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj

...I found this email containing backporting timeline for 4.0.1 (already done): http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-March/111530.html >From email, it is not clear to me whether we have upcoming 4.0.2 or not. Thanks! Yonghong On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:27 PM, 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > I have no experience on backporting. However, the patches you want > only involves BPF backend itself, > I don't see any particular trouble of backporting. I would suggest you > start working on the latest LLVM > release, i.e., 4.0, then run the testsuite to m...

...e there other alternatives? (hopefully more elegant than maintaining a shadow copy of all the files!). There's an "GPG and Rsync" thread describing almost exactly what we want <http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=adkpb7%242t6v%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26q%3Drsync%2Bencrypted%26spell%3D1> And also rsync-backup seems to be almost there -- but things seem to be happening at the server end. http://www.stearns.org/rsync-backup/ cheers, martin

2018-01-16 21:03 GMT+08:00 Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>: > On 16 January 2018 at 12:23, 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > > Do we have to emit directives in the epilogue, too? One of my test case > fail > > due to the directives in the epilogue have been executed. After removing > > them from epilogue, the exception is caught as expected. > > Emitting directives in the e...

...t; -- > > Thanks & Regards, > Dipanjan > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Homepage: https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171022/6a2f4eb9/attachment.html>

...l disable the verify check. On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 at 23:54 Dipanjan Das via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Yes, that definitely works. Wanted to know if there's a switch for file > output or not. > > On 21 October 2017 at 23:45, 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > >> Just use Unix IO redirect? `llc -mllvm -print-after-all &> a.txt` >> >> 2017-10-22 14:17 GMT+08:00 Dipanjan Das via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: >> >>> >>> Seems like "-mllvm -print-after-all&q...

Thank You Chen ! On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:21 PM 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > Perhaps you can refer to [1]. Function name should be a global one. > > [1] http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#identifiers > > HTH, > chenwj > > > 2017-06-22 16:35 GMT+08:00 SANJAY SRIVALLABH SINGAPURAM via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org...