Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "nbdkit_lib_h".
2020 Mar 26
1
Re: [PATCH nbdkit 5/9 patch split 1/5] Create libnbdkit.so.
...@ -93,6 +94,7 @@ nbdkit_CFLAGS = \
> $(VALGRIND_CFLAGS) \
> $(NULL)
> nbdkit_LDADD = \
> + ../lib/libnbdkit.la \
Is that ../ going to bite us on RHEL 7's older Automake? Do we need to
uses $(top_builddir) instead?
> +++ b/lib/lib.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +#ifndef NBDKIT_LIB_H
> +#define NBDKIT_LIB_H
> +
> +#include <stdarg.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/socket.h>
> +
> +/* Defines the private function which is used by the server to
> + * initialize libnbdkit.so at runtime. This AB...
2020 Mar 26
0
[PATCH nbdkit 5/9 patch split 1/5] Create libnbdkit.so.
...PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND
+ * ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY,
+ * OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT
+ * OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
+ * SUCH DAMAGE.
+ */
+
+#ifndef NBDKIT_LIB_H
+#define NBDKIT_LIB_H
+
+#include <stdarg.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <sys/socket.h>
+
+/* Defines the private function which is used by the server to
+ * initialize libnbdkit.so at runtime. This ABI may change at any
+ * time, which is why nb...
2020 Mar 26
9
[PATCH nbdkit 5/9 patch split 1/5] Create libnbdkit.so.
This is the previous 5/9 patch posted earlier today, split into
reviewable chunks. This passes bisection with -x 'make && make
check', but I didn't work very hard on the commit messages, so I refer
you back to the original patch to explain how it works:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/msg00248.html
Rich.
2020 Mar 26
15
[PATCH nbdkit 0/9] Create libnbdkit.so
This creates libnbdkit.so as discussed in the following thread:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/thread.html#00203
test-delay-shutdown.sh fails for unclear reasons.
This series starts by reverting "tests: Don't strand hung nbdkit
processes" which is because several other tests fail randomly unless I
revert this patch. I didn't investigate this yet so it